MA Special Election Watch Thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 20, 2024, 12:28:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MA Special Election Watch Thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 19
Author Topic: MA Special Election Watch Thread  (Read 44680 times)
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #100 on: December 24, 2012, 11:26:11 AM »

Ted Jr. isn't running.

http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/report-ted-kennedy-jr-wont-run-85460.html?hp=f3
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,482


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #101 on: December 24, 2012, 11:36:22 AM »

Unsurprising, since he lives out-of-state.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #102 on: December 24, 2012, 11:40:42 AM »

So a demolition derby between Markey, Capuano and Lynch?
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,482


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #103 on: December 24, 2012, 11:41:40 AM »

Seems that way, unless somebody like Downing actually gets traction. Doubtful, but possible.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #104 on: December 24, 2012, 11:43:17 AM »

Who'd have an advantage in that primary? Capuano got thumped by Coakley and Lynch is too conservative for liberals, so Markey?
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,482


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #105 on: December 24, 2012, 11:47:39 AM »

Markey would be my guess at the moment. He's widely respected in his district and among Democrats statewide, even though his general name recognition isn't great. I think Capuano is likelier than Lynch to upset. Remember that Coakley was considered the overwhelming favorite at pretty much every stage in the process until she actually lost.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #106 on: December 24, 2012, 09:15:01 PM »

As expected, Affleck takes a pass.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2012/12/affleck-passes-on-senate-run-152759.html?hp=l2

The Dems will go all-out to hold this seat. The Obamas and Clintons will be $$$ and campaigning for the nominee... whoever it is.

http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/obama-vows-help-electing-john-kerrys-successor-85439.html
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #107 on: December 24, 2012, 09:44:10 PM »

Who'd have an advantage in that primary? Capuano got thumped by Coakley and Lynch is too conservative for liberals, so Markey?

The more people that jump into the race, the better Lynch's chances. There are a lot of conservative, pro-life Democrats in Massachusetts in the Lynch mold. Not enough to win a one-on-one primary, but certainly enough to win a clusterf*** primary.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #108 on: December 25, 2012, 12:13:01 AM »

Who'd have an advantage in that primary? Capuano got thumped by Coakley and Lynch is too conservative for liberals, so Markey?

The more people that jump into the race, the better Lynch's chances. There are a lot of conservative, pro-life Democrats in Massachusetts in the Lynch mold. Not enough to win a one-on-one primary, but certainly enough to win a clusterf*** primary.

If Lynch wins, that could spell trouble for them in the general, because I think Democratic turnout would be severely depressed.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,471
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #109 on: December 25, 2012, 10:23:40 AM »

Lynch would definitely depress turnout, but I don't see him winning a Lynch vs. Markey vs. Capuano primary, he needs a bigger clown car than that.  I think Markey would beat Brown at this point, he's pretty respected among Massachusetts Democrats and he seems to really want it.  That means he is less likely to try to just cruise through like Coakley who, as has been pointed out, was only running to try and screw over Obama (and in a way she succeeded Tongue ).  I also think Capuano would beat Brown.  It would be a mistake to read very much into his primary defeat since Coakley was always the overwhelming favorite in the primary and Capuano didn't have the sort of backing he could/would get if he runs this time (especially if it is a Capuano vs. Lynch primary).  However, I think Markey would win a Capuano vs. Markey vs. Lynch primary.  Patrick would probably beat Brown as well, but he doesn't seem to want it.  

I also agree with sg0508 that it would be a mistake for Brown to run and that he'd be much better off running for Governor (and he'd have a very strong shot at winning if he ran for Governor).  Brown often came across as a bully during the 2012 campaign (his personal animosity towards Warren really came through) and he had some really bad moments (his answer about his ideal SC Justice comes to mind).  The former may well have damaged his "brand" and the later will provide plenty of ammunition in a Senate race, but both will be reasonably fresh in voters' minds.  Plus, he won't have the advantages he had in 2010 (the worst political environment in over 100 years for Democrats, catching the Dems off-gaurd, the MA Democratic Party being a complete mess, running against Coakley, etc).  Additionally, if he won he'd be the Democrats number one target in 2014.  I also wonder if there might be an anti-Brown/GOP backlash among Massachusetts voters if they feel like Rice's nomination was derailed just to give Brown another shot at staying in the Senate.  Polls may show Brown leading right now due to name recognition, but that's all (imo).  Lastly, I think that for a majority of MA voters', their animosity to the national Republican Party outweighs their positive feelings about Brown himself/Brown's likability.
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,522


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #110 on: December 25, 2012, 11:21:23 AM »

I think we're underestimating Brown's political prowess here. Let's not forget that even as the man went down to a seven point defeat in 2012, exit polls showed that sixty percent of voters still had him in their good graces. And let's not forget that this is the man who outperformed the losing presidential nominee of his presidential party by eight and a half points in the election. In 2013, Brown would face a less favorable environment for the Democratic Party, less negative coattails, and a less well-funded challenger (IIRC, Senator-elect Warren raised $39 million to unseat Brown; I think it's pretty likely that whoever Brown faces next year, if he chooses to run, will not receive that kind of money). Not to mention, this will be a quick six month campaign, not the year and a half long slog that Warren had to build up her name recognition.

I believe Lynch would all but assure a Republican victory, and I feel that a longtime liberal Congressman, like Capuano or Markey, would come across as an old hack in a campaign against Brown, in a way that the fresh-faced Warren did not. Democrats may receive an outsider for a candidate, like State Senator Downing, U.S. Attorney Ortiz, and possibly Congresswoman Niki Tsongas, but the risks for those three are very high, and Brown might actually cruise against such inexperienced candidates. However, I could envision one of those three using the tactics Brown used in 2010 against him, and pulling out a win.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,272
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #111 on: December 25, 2012, 12:13:39 PM »

I'm with Mr. X. Brown's not gonna win.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,641
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #112 on: December 25, 2012, 12:20:40 PM »

I'm finding it difficult to envision any of the three Congressmen beating Brown. All are down double-digits in the polls. Brown has more money and is better-known by a majority of people. Warren had a kind of 'unique appeal' to certain voters, as a fresh-faced expert liberal outsider, that Capuano/Lynch/Markey just don't have.

That said, Brown could choose not to run and to wait and go for Governor instead. But I'm inclined to think he runs.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #113 on: December 25, 2012, 12:30:46 PM »

Plus he won't have the 51 tag that he had in 2012.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #114 on: December 25, 2012, 05:02:57 PM »

As someone who thinks Brown is favored to win, let me play devil's advocate.

I'm finding it difficult to envision any of the three Congressmen beating Brown. All are down double-digits in the polls.

That was one poll, and it showed how little-known the congressmen were. Brown was around 50%, which is a good place to be, but those undecideds are all Dem-leaning.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Didn't he spend all his money in the campaign? I assume he's in debt. Meanwhile, Capuano and Markey haven't had a competitive race in at least a decade and presumably have a lot of cash with which to introduce themselves to the state.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

While she was a fresh face, she was also an academic and a woman who was very clearly not from here and was an inexperienced candidate. Those were all obstacles that held her back. She may have had a unique appeal to liberals--but Capuano has been no slouch in appealing to liberals, and neither has Markey. Warren turned out to be an ok candidate who won because she was good enough in a good environment in Massachusetts. That's not a high bar to match.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,277
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #115 on: December 25, 2012, 05:27:08 PM »

Honestly, the legislature should just change the law again and save the state a whole lot of money on a statewide special election. The seat is up in 2014 anyway, there's no reason an appointment can't last until then.
Logged
justfollowingtheelections
unempprof
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,766


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #116 on: December 25, 2012, 07:21:03 PM »

As someone who thinks Brown is favored to win, let me play devil's advocate.

I'm finding it difficult to envision any of the three Congressmen beating Brown. All are down double-digits in the polls.

That was one poll, and it showed how little-known the congressmen were. Brown was around 50%, which is a good place to be, but those undecideds are all Dem-leaning.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Didn't he spend all his money in the campaign? I assume he's in debt. Meanwhile, Capuano and Markey haven't had a competitive race in at least a decade and presumably have a lot of cash with which to introduce themselves to the state.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

While she was a fresh face, she was also an academic and a woman who was very clearly not from here and was an inexperienced candidate. Those were all obstacles that held her back. She may have had a unique appeal to liberals--but Capuano has been no slouch in appealing to liberals, and neither has Markey. Warren turned out to be an ok candidate who won because she was good enough in a good environment in Massachusetts. That's not a high bar to match.


Massachusetts is probably one of the few places in America where being an academic is a good thing, not a bad thing.  A poll had shown that people in Massachusetts have an overwhelmingly positive opinion of college professors (as they should).
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #117 on: December 25, 2012, 09:20:17 PM »

Honestly, the legislature should just change the law again and save the state a whole lot of money on a statewide special election. The seat is up in 2014 anyway, there's no reason an appointment can't last until then.

It'd look awfully self-serving to change the law yet again to avoid an imminent possibility of a Republican Senator.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #118 on: December 25, 2012, 09:33:58 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Didn't he spend all his money in the campaign? I assume he's in debt. Meanwhile, Capuano and Markey haven't had a competitive race in at least a decade and presumably have a lot of cash with which to introduce themselves to the state.

Though Markey and Capuano haven't had a real race ever, they only have $3M and $0.5M cash on hand respectively. That's really not much of a head start when you need at least $15M to play the game; probably $25M or more if Brown runs.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #119 on: December 25, 2012, 09:35:53 PM »

Looks like Brown is about $6 or $7M in debt.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,482


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #120 on: December 25, 2012, 10:46:41 PM »

Honestly, the legislature should just change the law again and save the state a whole lot of money on a statewide special election. The seat is up in 2014 anyway, there's no reason an appointment can't last until then.

It'd look awfully self-serving to change the law yet again to avoid an imminent possibility of a Republican Senator.

Why would that stop the Massachusetts General Court?
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,638
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #121 on: December 25, 2012, 10:54:46 PM »

Honestly, the legislature should just change the law again and save the state a whole lot of money on a statewide special election. The seat is up in 2014 anyway, there's no reason an appointment can't last until then.

It'd look awfully self-serving to change the law yet again to avoid an imminent possibility of a Republican Senator.
I don't think it'll have much of an impact, quite frankly. Yes it does sound cowardly, but still....
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,277
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #122 on: December 25, 2012, 11:04:08 PM »


It'd look awfully self-serving to change the law yet again to avoid an imminent possibility of a Republican Senator.

I really doubt that the legislature would care about that. It wasn't a great idea to change the law to begin with, as statewide elections are very expensive.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #123 on: December 25, 2012, 11:18:46 PM »

Honestly, the legislature should just change the law again and save the state a whole lot of money on a statewide special election. The seat is up in 2014 anyway, there's no reason an appointment can't last until then.

It'd look awfully self-serving to change the law yet again to avoid an imminent possibility of a Republican Senator.

Why would that stop the Massachusetts General Court?

Though they may be self-serving partisans, Massachusetts Democrats do have shame.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #124 on: December 26, 2012, 10:56:09 AM »

Looks like Brown is about $6 or $7M in debt.

Holy crap! He may have to run for senate in that case. Renting himself out to Wall Street is lucrative and they don't care if he runs for governor.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 19  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 10 queries.