Alaska Absentee/Write-in/Provisional Count
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 11:08:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Alaska Absentee/Write-in/Provisional Count
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
Author Topic: Alaska Absentee/Write-in/Provisional Count  (Read 13667 times)
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,395
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: November 10, 2010, 10:09:14 AM »


So sad that he doesn't even have a chance.Sad
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: November 10, 2010, 03:18:38 PM »

Alaska is starting to count write-ins today:

http://community.adn.com/adn/node/154249
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: November 10, 2010, 06:11:40 PM »

It's looking very good for Murkowski so far.  According to the Anchorage paper:

89% of the first batch of write-ins counted so far were perfect for Lisa Murkowski.

Only 67 of 7,638 write-ins counted were for someone other than Murkowski, including 1 for Miller and 5 for Sid Hill - who's in second place among write-ins.

Miller has challenged about 10% of the ballots counted so far - but almost all challenges have been overruled - only 89 of 678 were successful, 1.17% of the ballots counted.

Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,172


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: November 10, 2010, 06:17:04 PM »

Awesome. I can't wait to see Joe Miller go down.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,637
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: November 10, 2010, 08:08:21 PM »

Is Sid Hill anyone of note?
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: November 10, 2010, 08:10:44 PM »


http://www.adn.com/2010/08/27/1428432/statement-scuffle-caught-on-video.html
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,637
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: November 10, 2010, 08:13:58 PM »


A LaRochite. Of course!
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: November 11, 2010, 03:01:48 AM »

Anyone know what percent of Sekula-Gibbs's write-ins were disqualified in 2006?
By the time they got around to counting them, they knew there weren't enough, so they accepted about anything.  Texas treats write-in candidates as actual candidates (they have to pay a fee or file a petition, and file by early September), where other states treat them more like random scribbling that might match someone who said they were interested in votes the night before the election.

The votes in 3 of the counties were on DRE, where you vote for "Write-in" and then you get a screen that shows a keyboard (ABCDE rather than QWERTY).  You scroll with a scroll wheel which is sort of like a rotary phone dial, and select a letter at a time.  It is really a painful process.   The SOS would not let the counties pre-program the counting software, but once a counting board had accepted a particular spelling, all the duplicates could be counted automatically.  Galveston County had some ballots that were on paper - either the early votes or the election day votes, since they were still in the process of transitioning to new machines.  So the ballots were projected with an overhead projector one by one and the handwritten spelling interpreted.

Sekula-Gibbs had originally been elected to the Houston City Council as Sheila Rodriguez, since she was married to Sylvan Rodriguez, a TV newscaster who later died.  Even then her name was questionable since she was professionally Dr. Sekula.  She later married a Mr.Gibbs and changed her name.   Fort Bend County released its "name list" after the election and it had hundreds of spellings that had been accepted.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,198
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: November 11, 2010, 03:09:36 AM »

If 89% of counted WI-votes are "solid" for Murkowski and it stays that way until all of them are counted, she will even remain ahead of Miller without "questioned" ballots.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: November 11, 2010, 03:15:37 AM »

If 89% of counted WI-votes are "solid" for Murkowski and it stays that way until all of them are counted, she will even remain ahead of Miller without "questioned" ballots.
Though they are being counted on a precinct-by-precinct basis, so they might have a geographic bias.  If they start with the low numbered legislative districts in the panhandle, this might be particularly true.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,460


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: November 11, 2010, 03:16:30 AM »

If 89% of counted WI-votes are "solid" for Murkowski and it stays that way until all of them are counted, she will even remain ahead of Miller without "questioned" ballots.

Perhaps not if Miller can make up more ground with the remaining absentees.  89% of the write-in's breaking for Murkowski would give her a 571 vote margin over Miller, perhaps around 56- or so with a handful of write-in's for Milelr (2 so far), but what happens with the rest of the absentees could change that somewhat
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: November 11, 2010, 03:40:09 AM »

If 89% of counted WI-votes are "solid" for Murkowski and it stays that way until all of them are counted, she will even remain ahead of Miller without "questioned" ballots.

Just barely, but yeah... it'd be a solid victory.  Plus, if the courts continue to rule in her favor and allow imperfect spellings where voter intent is clear, she'll easily win.

Something I didn't think about that Miller (or someone who liked Miller so his campaign could distance himself from it) could've done to hurt Murkowski would've been to run adds telling people to write in "Lisa M." ... I know it got pretty dirty up there, so I'm kinda surprised nobody tried to do an ad campaign like that.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: November 11, 2010, 07:15:19 AM »

Murkowski's share of write-ins up to 98%: http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/11/11/1920285/murkowski-has-98-of-alaskas-write.html
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: November 11, 2010, 11:27:58 AM »


That's what it's been from the beginning. 98% includes most of the disputed misspellings.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,433
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: November 11, 2010, 11:38:42 AM »

I don't see Miller making up much ground with the absentees, remember that McAdams and the third parties got about 25%, so only 75% of those absentees matter for either candidate.
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: November 11, 2010, 12:29:17 PM »

It looks like they've counted some more votes (aside from working through the write-ins), so that the current gap has shrunk further. So far, it seems to be:

write-ins 92,979 (40.12%)
Joe Miller (R) 82,180 (35.46%)
Scott McAdams (D) 54,147 (23.36%)
Frederick Haase (L) 1,258 (0.54%)
Tim Carter 801 (0.35%)
Ted Gianoutsos 391 (0.17%)
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,357
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: November 11, 2010, 02:21:34 PM »

How many votes left to count ?
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,807
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: November 11, 2010, 02:26:55 PM »

Lol, haase didn't want to give his nomination to murkowski because he thought he could win hahaha
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: November 11, 2010, 02:59:45 PM »

The Miller campaign seems to have realized that they weren't challenging enough ballots yesterday to put Murkowski at least theoretically in trouble. They've begun making challenges that aren't even vaguely legitimate, such as this one:



http://community.adn.com/adn/node/154279
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: November 11, 2010, 03:32:49 PM »

The favorite challenge I've heard if is to a write-in ballot that had "Lisa Murkowski" spelled correctly, but followed it with the party label "Republican".
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: November 11, 2010, 03:47:46 PM »

Miller seems intent of making a total ass of himself, doesn't he?  There is this penchant this year to destroy one's career for some reason. We saw that with Conway in Kentucky, and now here.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,019


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: November 11, 2010, 04:14:06 PM »

Hopefully the sore loser's career is over after this.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: November 11, 2010, 04:33:55 PM »

The Miller campaign seems to have realized that they weren't challenging enough ballots yesterday to put Murkowski at least theoretically in trouble. They've begun making challenges that aren't even vaguely legitimate, such as this one:



http://community.adn.com/adn/node/154279

Well, that's what they deserve for writing in cursive.  Damn people who don't want me to be able to read their writing.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,460


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: November 11, 2010, 04:34:44 PM »

Miller is such a joke.
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: November 11, 2010, 04:36:24 PM »

The Miller campaign seems to have realized that they weren't challenging enough ballots yesterday to put Murkowski at least theoretically in trouble. They've begun making challenges that aren't even vaguely legitimate, such as this one:



http://community.adn.com/adn/node/154279

Well, that's what they deserve for writing in cursive.  Damn people who don't want me to be able to read their writing.

I was about to post that very link. That's indeed pathetic.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 10 queries.