CT: Rasmussen: Lamont (D) slightly ahead of Foley (R)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 27, 2023, 12:15:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  CT: Rasmussen: Lamont (D) slightly ahead of Foley (R)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CT: Rasmussen: Lamont (D) slightly ahead of Foley (R)  (Read 1276 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,175
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 05, 2010, 01:14:21 AM »

New Poll: Connecticut Governor by Rasmussen on 2010-02-01

Summary: D: 40%, R: 37%, U: 14%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

.....


Ned Lamont (D): 40%
Thomas Foley (R): 37%

Ned Lamont (D): 41%
Michael Fedele (R): 33%

Dan Malloy (D): 37%
Thomas Foley (R): 36%

Dan Malloy (D): 36%
Michael Fedele (R): 35%
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2010, 08:34:59 AM »

Supposedly, Lamont just hired Joe Abbey, from the disastrous Deeds campaign, so be on the lookout for the Democrats snatching defeat from the jaws of victory once again.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,548


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2010, 01:23:10 PM »

Ned Lamont = loser.
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,995
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2010, 01:28:05 PM »


Yes, and the pope is catholic.

I think that is an established fact.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2010, 08:40:51 PM »

I'm a little confused by Lamont here, actually.  What's his schtick anyway?  In 2006, he was the anti-war Democrat...but to run for governor in 2010, is he going to run as the economic populist or what?
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,548


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 07, 2010, 08:45:08 PM »

I'm a little confused by Lamont here, actually.  What's his schtick anyway?  In 2006, he was the anti-war Democrat...but to run for governor in 2010, is he going to run as the economic populist or what?

Ned Lamont running as an economic populist would be one of the great ironies of the political world ever.  I like it.  Tongue
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 07, 2010, 09:05:12 PM »

Meh, I would say that sort of thing is fairly common
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,548


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 07, 2010, 09:12:06 PM »

Meh, I would say that sort of thing is fairly common

Common, but to that degree?  I mean Lamont comes from, well, you know...  Makes George Bush's silver spoon look rather insignificant.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,149
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 07, 2010, 10:48:17 PM »


Yes, and the pope is catholic.

I think that is an established fact.

Uh, he lost one race in the general election. He still managed to oust a sitting U.S. Senator in a primary. I take the fact that he's actually leading in a Rasmussen poll (of all polls) as a pretty good sign.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2010, 10:51:07 PM »


Yes, and the pope is catholic.

I think that is an established fact.

Uh, he lost one race in the general election. He still managed to oust a sitting U.S. Senator in a primary. I take the fact that he's actually leading in a Rasmussen poll (of all polls) as a pretty good sign.

The fact that Lieberman is still a sitting senator is a pretty good sign that losers can still win elected office, for what it's worth.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,149
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 07, 2010, 10:54:37 PM »

He has no chance, that must be why he's leading.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 08, 2010, 11:00:17 PM »

Add the fact that he's a millionaire rich boy in a populist environment, and he's toast.  Maybe that Susan Byciewiez bitch can beat him.

Susan will have a hard time beating him considering she dropped out and is now running for AG (despite being the frontrunner for the nomination).
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,435
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 08, 2010, 11:47:17 PM »

I'm a little confused by Lamont here, actually.  What's his schtick anyway?  In 2006, he was the anti-war Democrat...but to run for governor in 2010, is he going to run as the economic populist or what?

Presumably, he's gonna run as the guy who deserves the office because he came close to winning a race for another unrelated office.

We all know how well those campaigns generally go.

I cannot believe that Democrats are going to just let this guy waltz to a loss in November.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 14 queries.