Should all 'yes' or all 'no' responses to proposals be an option on the ballot?

[Gabu]

No... while all people under the "D" or "R" column are likely to have something common between them, propositions have no such common adhesion.  If this was enabled, people would word propositions like "Shall we not spend $500 million on a bridge to nowhere?" and would immediately get the guaranteed vote of every libertarian who thinks they're voting against a government expenditure.

[Gabu]

No... while all people under the "D" or "R" column are likely to have something common between them, propositions have no such common adhesion.  If this was enabled, people would word propositions like "Shall we not spend $500 million on a bridge to nowhere?" and would immediately get the guaranteed vote of every libertarian who thinks they're voting against a government expenditure.

You're getting off topic-to say that proposals are badly worded, and I don't think that will ever change.  But-there're plenty of cases that the Democrats, or Republicans are vastly different.  I think that it's stupid to put such blind faith in 20 different candidates only because they're of one party.  A "Yes" or "No" straight proposal vote would serve as a cop-out response for those that do straight party vote, so they wouldn't have to think... 

Well, I don't support straight-ticket voting either, so I don't have to justify it.