Is Amnesty International an "absurd" group of American Haters? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 10:08:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Is Amnesty International an "absurd" group of American Haters? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is Amnestity International an "absurd" group of American Haters?
#1
yes
 
#2
no
 
#3
not sure
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 79

Author Topic: Is Amnesty International an "absurd" group of American Haters?  (Read 20059 times)
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,223


« on: June 01, 2005, 12:56:17 AM »

I believe it was the report that was labeled absurd, not human rights. Actually, I know so, because I watched the press conference—but thanks for lying, as you typically do. Or are you just confused?

I further believe that this is a group that relies on the words of former detainees as some kind of objective source of information.

That brilliant, objective report - you know, based on what former detainees trained to lie about this stuff had to say - accused America of torture.

"Guantanamo has become the gulag of our time," was their conclusion.

That's a joke, their report was a joke, and if they're not jokes, then they're having a great time laughing at their report right about now.

By the way, please learn how to spell Amnesty.

Don't be a hypocrite. I bet 20 years ago if people escaped Soviet Gulags you'd believe every word of their testimony. Of course Guantanamo abuses human rights.

Why should animal terrorists recieve human "rights" even if their is such a thing as human "rights"?
How do you know that they are terrorists? You haven't even charged them.
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,223


« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2005, 04:08:12 AM »

I believe it was the report that was labeled absurd, not human rights. Actually, I know so, because I watched the press conference—but thanks for lying, as you typically do. Or are you just confused?

I further believe that this is a group that relies on the words of former detainees as some kind of objective source of information.

That brilliant, objective report - you know, based on what former detainees trained to lie about this stuff had to say - accused America of torture.

"Guantanamo has become the gulag of our time," was their conclusion.

That's a joke, their report was a joke, and if they're not jokes, then they're having a great time laughing at their report right about now.

By the way, please learn how to spell Amnesty.

Don't be a hypocrite. I bet 20 years ago if people escaped Soviet Gulags you'd believe every word of their testimony. Of course Guantanamo abuses human rights.

Why should animal terrorists recieve human "rights" even if their is such a thing as human "rights"?
How do you know that they are terrorists? You haven't even charged them.

Ok, they were captured in combat..fighting US troops. Obviously they are thugs, murderers or terrorists. I don't understand why liberals can't make simple calculations in their heads.
...and if the North Vietnamese tortured American POWs this way and threw Bibles in toilets you would be...
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,223


« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2005, 06:42:50 AM »

Lets face facts, AI is a leftwing organization with an agenda.

Amnesty leadership aided Kerry


By Rowan Scarborough
THE WASHINGTON TIMES


The top leadership of Amnesty International USA, which unleashed a blistering attack last week on the Bush administration's handling of war detainees, contributed the maximum $2,000 to Sen. John Kerry's presidential campaign.
    Federal Election Commission records show that William F. Schulz, executive director of Amnesty USA, contributed $2,000 to Mr. Kerry's campaign last year. Mr. Schulz also has contributed $1,000 to the 2006 campaign of Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat.
    Also, Joe W. "Chip" Pitts III, board chairman of Amnesty International USA, gave the maximum $2,000 allowed by federal law to John Kerry for President. Mr. Pitts is a lawyer and entrepreneur who advises the American Civil Liberties Union.


Were those Amnesty as an organization donating funds or just those individuals?
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,223


« Reply #3 on: June 04, 2005, 12:06:09 AM »

So if this organization protects some absurd idea of "human rights" are they anti abortion? Or are they total hypocrites?
They haven't made a stance on abortion, but they have in the past condemned how China is forcing people to abort.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.