Rate Montana for Senate (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 12:10:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Rate Montana for Senate (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who will win
#1
Bullock
 
#2
Daines
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 85

Author Topic: Rate Montana for Senate  (Read 4230 times)
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,038
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

« on: May 25, 2020, 02:16:24 PM »

Daines +8
Trump +16
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,038
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2020, 07:12:45 AM »
« Edited: May 26, 2020, 07:19:51 AM by Del Tachi »


Both campaigns' internal polling shows Bullock up by single digits, you know. It's not a coincidence that Bullock declared for the race immediately after it was clear Biden and not Sanders had the nomination.

This election is in November and Donald Trump will win Montana by at least 15 points, you know.  

Evan Bayh was also leading the Indiana Senate polls for awhile too.  Bullock won’t be able to campaign behind his fake moderate shield when he’s having to run against  Donald Trump.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,038
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

« Reply #2 on: May 26, 2020, 07:25:00 AM »


Both campaigns' internal polling shows Bullock up by single digits, you know. It's not a coincidence that Bullock declared for the race immediately after it was clear Biden and not Sanders had the nomination.

This election is in November and Donald Trump will win Montana will win by at least 15 points, you know. 

Evan Bayh was also leading the Indiana Senate polls for awhile too.  Bullock won’t be able to campaign behind his fake moderate shield when he’s having to run against  Donald Trump.
Evan Bayh never had to campaign seriously in two senate terms, Bullock had to campaign to be elected Governor/re-election, and Montana 2018 proves that even though Tester voted against Kavanaugh, he won by the highest margin of his career in the Senate.

Yeah, at least Bayh had a great record of statewide success (winning 3/4 statewide races by >20pts).  Bullock won his reelection campaign by only 30k votes in 2016 (3.9pp) and only won with a plurality in 2012. 

An electoral juggernaut Bullock is not.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,038
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

« Reply #3 on: May 26, 2020, 08:30:08 AM »


Both campaigns' internal polling shows Bullock up by single digits, you know. It's not a coincidence that Bullock declared for the race immediately after it was clear Biden and not Sanders had the nomination.

This election is in November and Donald Trump will win Montana by at least 15 points, you know. 

Evan Bayh was also leading the Indiana Senate polls for awhile too.  Bullock won’t be able to campaign behind his fake moderate shield when he’s having to run against  Donald Trump.

You do realize Bayh had the whole residency controversy that Bullock will not have, right?

I’m going to trust MT Treasurer’s and Heir of Camelot’s word on this race (since they are, you know, Montanans)  and call it a tossup.

The point is that polls in April and May have very little predictive value, or else we’d have Senator Bayh and Senator Bredesen. 

Given that Trump will almost assuredly win MT by double digits and Bullock still hasn’t felt the heat of a national campaign yet, I know whose shoes I’d want to be in at this point. 
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,038
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2020, 08:33:04 AM »


Both campaigns' internal polling shows Bullock up by single digits, you know. It's not a coincidence that Bullock declared for the race immediately after it was clear Biden and not Sanders had the nomination.

This election is in November and Donald Trump will win Montana will win by at least 15 points, you know. 

Evan Bayh was also leading the Indiana Senate polls for awhile too.  Bullock won’t be able to campaign behind his fake moderate shield when he’s having to run against  Donald Trump.

Bayh also had weaknesses that Bullock doesn't. After leaving the Senate, he cashed out as a lobbyist and barely visited Indiana while owning multimillion dollar houses in DC and Florida. Bullock is the popular incumbent governor (like Maggie Hassan or Rick Scott) in a state that flattened the curve very effectively.

Hassan and Scott had the obvious benefit of running in states aligned with their respective parties, which is really what explains 98 percent of their performance.  Bullock will be running against partisan headwinds in a state Trump is almost certain to win (probably by double digits).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.