Would you be embarassed by this fact? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 12:10:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Would you be embarassed by this fact? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would you be embarassed by this fact?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 23

Author Topic: Would you be embarassed by this fact?  (Read 3440 times)
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

« on: October 04, 2010, 09:32:16 PM »
« edited: October 04, 2010, 11:21:50 PM by Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC »

89% versus 87.5%?  Are you telling me that 1.5% of the population there didn't vote for Obama? 

ARE YOU F---ING KIDDING ME?

That sounds like the most horrible, ungodly hellhole on the planet Earth.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2010, 02:03:29 PM »

89% versus 87.5%?  Are you telling me that 1.5% of the population there didn't vote for Obama? 

ARE YOU F---ING KIDDING ME?

That sounds like the most horrible, ungodly hellhole on the planet Earth.

No, I think he might be telling you that 11% and 12.5% respectively did not vote for Obama.

I meant to say that 1.5% more of the population didn't vote for Obama.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2010, 10:27:36 PM »

Strip clubs, opebo, South Park, suburbs and Florida.

Ralph Nader, Catholics, Ireland, Guy Picciotto, Croatia, Brad Pitt, and Obama.

Mormons, Scientology, libertarians, polls.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2010, 12:00:58 AM »

Guys this was just a thought that came to me when I saw that quickly. I never stated that I will never move to an 87.5% Obama precinct under any circumstances. I haven't looked at other apartments yet but mostly because I'm busy. If I can find any that might be cheaper I might look into them later even if it's an 87.5% Obama neighborhood. I was merely referring to that thought even popping into your head. People are taking this too seriously.

Though one notable fact is that every move I've ever done is to a stronger Obama precinct except from where my parents lived when I was born which was an 85.28% Obama precinct and then we moved to a 57.38% McCain precinct. Since then I've moved to a 59.44% Obama precinct, then a 65.91% Obama precinct, then a 82.51% Obama precinct and then my current one. Of course I'll admit at this point the trend probably has to stop. There are only 16 stronger precincts for Obama in Minneapolis than my current one out of over 130, and only 2 in St. Paul.

Where do you get your data?

From the libertarian Mormons who live in the suburbs, who browse TV Tropes and watch South Park.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.