OK, and the relevance of dragging in Sanchez's brother into this debate or his deathsticks is? I don't see the relevance here and dragging people's personal lives into this makes it feel like we're not debating the budget but Sanchez's internal drama be what they are.
So: we could argue that balancing the budget and paying down the national debt would allow us to reduce our interest payments which would save us $1 trillion per 4 years if we paid off our national debt or reduced it to a negligible amount. That is one reason to back cuts to the budget (but also another reason to suggest that tax cuts be put on hold in favor of gaining budget surpluses).
I haven't read this document and I might, but do we know for a fact what the Trump budget really cuts without reading the budget booklet they put out?
Meanwhile, $1 of tax increases still affect the budget the same as $1 in budget cuts. When does it need to be an Occupy Wall Street type 2 adaalat the hard mathematical quantifiable fact that the prosperity of the last 10 to 20 years - - what there has been of it anyway - Dash has overwhelmingly gone to a tiny fraction of a percent at the top of the economic ladder. Under such circumstances, would it really be that socialistic for a moderate Republican myself to suggest that, God forbid, a tax increase on the uber wealthy be given priority over slashing Medicaid for healthcare among the poorest? Not to mention I trust Medicaid disbursements providing jobs for home health care aides, nurses comma medical technicians across-the-board, rather than the absence of any tax increase on the extremely wealthy cutting jobs like an extra Gardener for their third house or the like.
Poll
