Official North Carolina Democratic Primary Discussion Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 11:35:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Official North Carolina Democratic Primary Discussion Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Official North Carolina Democratic Primary Discussion Thread  (Read 10343 times)
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« on: May 06, 2008, 02:43:26 PM »

I'm hearing black turnout is huge.


Where are you getting that?
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2008, 04:19:50 PM »

isnt't 1/3 black in NC incredibly low? or is that just my impression?
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2008, 04:46:04 PM »
« Edited: May 06, 2008, 04:48:07 PM by Franzl »

Exit polls that came out before the results came in showed Hillary winning California by close to double digits. And that is ultimately by how much she won California.

Obama tends to overperform in exit polls because older voters are less likely to respond to them, because they're now generally conducted by college students.

The early California exits had Clinton up about 12, IIRC, which is notably more than the 8 she got.

And again, please show me a source that substantiates your claim that early voters are measured in exit polls (how?  By mashing phone interviews into exit poll interviews?).

But that would mean that Clinton, in fact, was overstated in the exit
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2008, 04:51:52 PM »

But that would mean that Clinton, in fact, was understated in the exit

Well...no...but forget this.  My train of thought has totally derailed.  This is an excessively complicated explanation proving that exit polls don't include early voters, when really I should just be demanding proof that they do.  Tongue

I understand Smiley
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2008, 04:58:21 PM »

Huffington Post has a leak of total numbers:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

Clinton +5 in IN
Obama +12 in NC


that would be extremely positive for Clinton, I believe.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #5 on: May 07, 2008, 10:40:10 AM »

He's basically out of ideas. (and a bit delusional)

It was a bad night for him, having blindly supported Survey USA's numbers without listening to any opposition or criticisms from other posters about the numbers, while calling everyone else a hack when he himself is most clearly one of the most hackish on this forum.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 11 queries.