The Hofoid House of Absurd & Ignorant Posts VII (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 12:57:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  The Hofoid House of Absurd & Ignorant Posts VII (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Hofoid House of Absurd & Ignorant Posts VII  (Read 242900 times)
Florida Man for Crime
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,101


« on: August 26, 2018, 05:30:58 PM »

Every day when I look at the approval thread and a lot of other posts on here, I notice that some posters seem to be pining for Trump's approval ratings to go up.

My question is, what exactly would be so appealing about a rise in Trump's numbers? His approvals rising by any significant amount (i.e. more than a rise of a few points) would likely only be possible with a horrendous 9/11 style mass destruction terrorist attack or Pearl Harbor type attack by a foreign government causing a rally-around-the-flag effect. Attacks against America such as Pearl Harbor in 1941 and 9/11 in 2001 were pretty terrible times to live through as an American citizen, and I'd think most people are old enough to at least remember the latter.

It just seems more and more to me that Trump supporters are rooting for misery, failure, and mass scale death of their fellow citizens in America simply because they like Trump that much. That doesn't make you much of a citizen if you ask me.

Trump supporters, why do you hate America and want your fellow citizens to die?

I disagree with the above argument and would agree that it is absurd and ignorant. The reason I posted it was to illustrate the absurdity and ignorance of the following post that was posted before it:

Every day when I look at the approval thread and a lot of other posts on here, I notice that many posters seem to be pining for Trump's approval ratings to plummet into the 20s a la Nixon or GWB at the end of their administrations. Stability in the polls seems to frustrate people, as if their lives are made worse by Trump's approval remaining in the 40s.

My question is, what exactly would be so appealing about a collapse in Trump's numbers? His approvals falling to catastrophic levels would likely result in congressional gridlock, economic downfall, and a weaker position on the world stage. Eras such as 1974 and 2008 were pretty terrible times to live through as an American citizen, and I'd think most people are old enough to at least remember the latter.

It just seems more and more to me that Trump detractors are rooting for misery and failure in America simply because they hate the party in control that much. That doesn't make you much of a citizen if you ask me.

If you think that either of these arguments is absurd and ignorant, then you ought to think that the other one is as well.
Logged
Florida Man for Crime
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,101


« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2018, 04:37:14 PM »

“If you want to pick judges, win elections.”


Also this one (to a somewhat lesser extent, I would say):

I am not interested in getting into a clash over this, and I will not drag myself through as I have with many other users here. Let me make this crystal clear: I didn't support what Mitch McConnell did in 2016, and I would have confirmed Garland if I were a Senator. But at the same time, people seem to be confusing things over this. A Garland nomination is not the same as an automatic Garland appointment. If Garland had been given a hearing, and had been duly rejected (like Robert Bork was), and if all other Obama nominees for that seat had been given hearings, and had also been duly rejected, would people still be complaining that this is a stolen seat? I would be hard pressed to say so.
Logged
Florida Man for Crime
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,101


« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2018, 09:40:17 PM »

There is literally NO WAY to prove this, so no he will not be.  This is a witch hunt against a Catholic.

Whatever else you may want to call this, you can't call it anti-Catholic bias. The Senate clearly does not have a bias against confirming - nor do Presidents have a bias against nominating - Catholics to the Supreme Court.

Of the 8 people on SCOTUS, 4 are Catholic (plus Gorsuch was raised Catholic, and Kennedy was Catholic, as were other recent Justices such as Scalia).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States

I'm talking about Catholics who live their faith, not Sotomayor.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 10 queries.