afleitch vs. jmfcst (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 10:04:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community
  Forum Community Election Match-ups (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  afleitch vs. jmfcst (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: who do you vote for/who wins?
#1
afleitch/afleitch		  
#2
afleitch/jmfcst		  
#3
jmfcst/afleitch		  
#4
jmfcst/jmfcst		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 43

Author Topic: afleitch vs. jmfcst  (Read 9624 times)
CubOB
ChrisOB
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 982


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -7.13
« on: January 13, 2006, 03:44:49 PM »
afleitch for both, I understand the argument that a gay man would never be elected, but if the choice was between a gay man and a CLEAR loon? Come on Smiley

Also, I like the idea because I'd be First...Man? Cheesy
Logged
CubOB
ChrisOB
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 982


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -7.13
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2006, 11:08:24 PM »
Quote from: jmfcst on January 13, 2006, 06:00:54 PM
Quote from: Joe Republic on January 13, 2006, 05:42:12 PM
Quote from: jmfcst on January 13, 2006, 04:57:21 PM
in the closet = non-flamer
out of closet = flamer

Incorrect.  The common meaning of the word 'flaming' in this context is a guy who is flamboyantly gay and/or effeminate.  There are many 'butch' gay guys, for example.  And just normal gay guys too.


OK, I didn't know there was an official definition for the term.  I guess I haven't heard it used enough to have grasped its meaning.
In that case, maybe it's not the best idea to throw the term around without finding out the meaning of it first?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.