Who is more vulnerable in 2026? Hobbs or Lombardo? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 04:45:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Who is more vulnerable in 2026? Hobbs or Lombardo? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who is more vulnerable in 2026?
#1
Katie Hobbs
 
#2
Joe Lombardo
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 44

Author Topic: Who is more vulnerable in 2026? Hobbs or Lombardo?  (Read 1445 times)
RussFeingoldWasRobbed
Progress96
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,275
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.26

« on: March 10, 2023, 02:23:52 PM »

As long as the AZ GOP nominee in 2022 isn't a Lake/Masters/Finchem type, this is easily Hobbs IMO.
Hobbs was a bland candidate who honestly was not a strong candidate who got lucky that Lake was a nutcase who decided it was smart to insult McCain and was toxic for many moderates. I think Lombardo for example would've beaten Hobbs if he was in AZ.
NV to me is still more culturally "liberal" and Sisolak was hurt greatly by his COVID restrictions and barely lost.

So Hobbs is completely safe then. Arizona GOP seems incapable of nominating a serious candidate.
Yall are going to be disappointed if your assuming AZ GOP is going to eternally nominate lunatics. Now the more moderate candidates can point to 2022 as proof these people are unelectable
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.