Most recent POTUS from opposite party you consider an FF? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 10:50:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Most recent POTUS from opposite party you consider an FF? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Most recent POTUS from opposite party you consider an FF?  (Read 592 times)
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,782


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


« on: May 31, 2022, 05:20:21 PM »

On a personal level, Carter.  In terms of politics, arguably none since the Republicans became the opposition to the Democrats (maybe Cleveland, but I don't know enough about his views to say).
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,782


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2022, 09:48:44 PM »

On a personal level, Carter.  In terms of politics, arguably none since the Republicans became the opposition to the Democrats (maybe Cleveland, but I don't know enough about his views to say).

Surely you preferred Bell to Lincoln?

You clearly don't know my views at all to suggest that.  Slavery was the greatest injustice of its day and needed to be abolished.  To treat someone made in the Image of God as sub-human is evil.
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,782


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2022, 08:07:06 AM »

On a personal level, Carter.  In terms of politics, arguably none since the Republicans became the opposition to the Democrats (maybe Cleveland, but I don't know enough about his views to say).

Surely you preferred Bell to Lincoln?

You clearly don't know my views at all to suggest that.  Slavery was the greatest injustice of its day and needed to be abolished.  To treat someone made in the Image of God as sub-human is evil.

I didn't say Breckenridge, lol.

Also, nobody is translating current views into back then. I have no doubt you (and all of us aside from Yellowhammer) would vote for Lincoln now, but if you were back then I thought you'd go for someone from your own state since that was a thing back then.


He has posted before how his family lived in the North back in those days

More accurately, one side of my family was in the North (PA coal mining country), while the other side of my family was in the South (North and South Carolina).  So, realistically, there's no way "I" would have ever existed in the 19th Century because my "parents" never would have met.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.