2032: David Hogg vs. Ivanka Trump (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 30, 2024, 12:41:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Alternative Elections (Moderator: Dereich)
  2032: David Hogg vs. Ivanka Trump (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: .
#1
Sen. David Hogg
 
#2
Speaker Ivanka Trump
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 29

Author Topic: 2032: David Hogg vs. Ivanka Trump  (Read 1182 times)
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,666
United States


« on: March 24, 2018, 04:23:02 PM »
« edited: March 24, 2018, 04:27:03 PM by bronz4141 »



281-257

Hogg wins because of suburban white liberals in Florida and Pennsylvania.

Or:



308-230
America gets another Trump presidency as Hogg's liberalism is unelectable in Middle America.
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,666
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2018, 04:28:00 PM »

The Republican base would probably not even support Ms. Kushner. She is seen as a NYC coastal liberal, despite the fact her father has unorthodox views with the GOP.
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,666
United States


« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2018, 10:13:02 AM »



281-257

Hogg wins because of suburban white liberals in Florida and Pennsylvania.

Or:



308-230
America gets another Trump presidency as Hogg's liberalism is unelectable in Middle America.

So your saying the American political electoral will not change/barely at all in the next 14 years?
It will change electorally, by a few points. White male millennials lean GOP. Hogg needs to appeal to them.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 14 queries.