CNN: Newly released Clinton emails show favors for Foundation donors.

[Fusionmunster]

And again, the two highlighted emails really dont show anything. Hillary is a stronger candidate than people thought. Assange doesnt have anything, Judicial Watch cant find anything and Trumps an idiot. I think Hillary might be president come January.

[Fusionmunster]

There should be a House hearing about this:

In one instance, top Clinton Foundation official Doug Band lobbied Clinton aides for a job for someone else in the State Department. In the email, Band tells Hillary Clinton's former aides at the department -- Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin -- that it is "important to take care of (redacted)." Band is reassured by Abedin that "Personnel has been sending him options."

Why? Thats how people get jobs in the white house, through connections.

[Fusionmunster]

Abedine, through her position at Foundation and Foundation, steered donors to Secretary Clinton (Wall Street Journal).

Its the same article with a different headline(which you changed). Theres nothing wrong with using your connections as Secretary of state, especially in a country like Lebanon.

[Fusionmunster]

Is there any indication that the person being "taken care of" was a donor and not just someone who was very helpful or competent?

The person in question is connected to a wealthy Nigerian-Lebanese donor to the Clinton Foundation. Bill attended his wedding in France.

Cheryl Mills, Clinton aides aggressively tracked FOIA efforts.

Abedine, through her position at Foundation and Foundation, steered donors to Secretary Clinton (Wall Street Journal).

Its the same article with a different headline. Theres nothing wrong with using your connections as Secretary of state, especially in a country like Lebanon.

So there is nothing wrong with using the government to reward donors to your personal cashcow?

Two different people actually. One name is redacted, the wealthy Lebanese mans was not.

[Fusionmunster]

Chairman, there's a reason this isn't going to be in the news tomorrow and it isn't because of the corrupt media.

[Fusionmunster]

Chairman, there's a reason this isn't going to be in the news tomorrow and it isn't because of the corrupt media.

Really? I'm seeing it on the CNN ticker as I type this and I suspect by the evening it will on the air. Will you address the allegations though or continue to deny the allegations that are in your face?

I said tomorrow, didn't I. 

[Fusionmunster]

Chairman, there's a reason this isn't going to be in the news tomorrow and it isn't because of the corrupt media.

Really? I'm seeing it on the CNN ticker as I type this and I suspect by the evening it will on the air. Will you address the allegations though or continue to deny the allegations that are in your face?

I said tomorrow, didn't I. 

Yet you still have not bothered to read the articles or explain why this won't be on the news.

Lol, Trump supporters are so desperate.

There is nothing new or damning here, if it was this would be among the top 5 stories on CNN.

Yeah, news networks that have reportedly pounded a candidate unfairly for weeks on events that literally didn't happen like the so called "threat" yesterday are totally going to put a lot of energy taking on someone who is a threat to their owners. Sure.

I did read the articles, I question if you actually read the articles.

[Fusionmunster]

And here comes the CNN report right now! I thought the media didn't care because it was a non-story?

Nobody has said CNN wasn't covering this, I said CNN won't be covering this tomorrow. I don't know if your actually this desperate or just trolling us like the first day of the DNC.

[Fusionmunster]

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/JW-v-State-Abedin-production-9-00684-2.pdf
Here are the emails in their raw form.

Okay, here is my question: why would the FBI care about the Clinton Foundation? None of these emails contained classified information, so they weren't relevant to the investigation. Obstruction of justice is a gigantic stretch.

The obstruction of justice involves her hiding emails that are damaging politically. She withheld these emails from the FBI, and they certainly point to wrong-doing. She's withheld key information yet again.

You're saying she withheld them when no one has even said that the FBI asked for them. You're jumping to conclusions with no evidence based on the ramblings of Judicial Watch. Very sad.

The FBI has not commented if they did look into the Clinton Foundation. They most likely did not. They ought to now.

Also, it's "Sad!", no "Very sad." Get 'ya Trump memes straight.

It said right in the CNN link:

"The Clinton Foundation was not part of the recent investigation into her private server; it was separate. The FBI went to Justice Department earlier this year asking for it to open a case into the foundation, but the public integrity unit declined. The Justice Department had looked into whether it should open a case on the foundation a year prior and found it didn't have sufficient evidence to do so."