The Al Realpolitik Institute of Sulfur Mining & Extraction

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Well, that IS "not quite one point".

The sad thing is, J. J. does love to cling to that type of mathematical argument. I recall him in 2008 hammering on Lunar over some campaign ad buy discussion because Lunar talked about Obama having $25 million to spend somewhere when it was really just $24 million or something like that. And then there's his whole Bradley Effect nonsense...

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

px gets two in one thread:

A full expiration of the 2010 tax cuts isn't quite enough to pay all these welfare queens that obama has put on the public dole.

True, but it will get the deficit into manageable territory. That is not to say that I support Obama's course of tax hikes without spending cuts, which will likely cause another official recession next year (albeit of a less severe magnitude than the last one since it will probably be more like the 2001 or 1991 recession). However, we obviously cannot have perpetual trillion dollar deficits.

FORWARD!

So that's how it looks when two retards are masturbating each other.

A full expiration of the 2010 tax cuts isn't quite enough to pay all these welfare queens that obama has put on the public dole.

True, but it will get the deficit into manageable territory. That is not to say that I support Obama's course of tax hikes without spending cuts, which will likely cause another official recession next year (albeit of a less severe magnitude than the last one since it will probably be more like the 2001 or 1991 recession). However, we obviously cannot have perpetual trillion dollar deficits.

FORWARD!

So that's how it looks when two retards are masturbating each other.

Here are 10,000 retards:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rshdJZruH_0

There must be only 9999 because I can't see you anywhere.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

I never thought I'd be put in an entry from this poster (though he doesn't seem to know how to quote properly so I'll fix the quotes here):

You missed the corollary to that rule:

Never trust just one poll.  Trust several and remember that the electorate changes its mind quickly.

Dear God, just shut up.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

I'm double posting this because it both has a very funny part and a very brutal part.

Uh, JJ, you do realize that virtually every other pollster has shown Obama with a bigger lead in Ohio than PPP, right?

I have not trusted a mail poll since 1936.  

I'm not crazy about those Uni polls for Ohio.  

J.J. I'm channelling The Professor here. Your assignment: Compare and contrast the polling methodology used by Literary Digest in 1936 vs. The Columbus Dispatch in the last several elections. Please reference the relative accuracy or inaccuracy of each poll relative to the final results.

Optional assignment: Quit hacking with grossly mismatched historical analogies.

Failing either will not help you get girls.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

What Alcon said. A C-list actress endorsed Romney and some people acted like jerks on the internet. That's news?

Some of the reaction is interesting.

What?  No it's not.  People are jerks on the Internet and this is news to you?  Are you still using free AOL CDs too?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

This is my all time favorite:

haha J. J.

The two polls with Romney leads were in October, well after the Bachmann surge.

Your claim again, was:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

But, really, keep digging this hole, it's fantastic.

I missed those two and was looking at the end.  Somebody was jumping up, I thought it was Bachman.  

By Bachman, you mean Bachmann.

By two, you mean five.

By "Somebody was jumping up, I thought it was Bachman," you mean, "man, I really made myself look like a grade-A schmuck."

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

It says a lot when even Mister Twister can get one of those in against J. J.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

I'm double posting in this and the Good Post Gallery:

As always, J. J., you are almost totally wrong, but have found one thing that you will inevitably latch onto, to pretend you're actually competent in what you're discussing.  Let's begin!

No, but unless the guy was a letter carrier or a a public official, he had no obligation to deliver them.  Simply put, it is not legal to draft people into the US Postal Service.

Wrong in every state I know of, wrong in Virginia.  To wit: "If any person (i) agrees to mail or deliver a signed voter registration application to the voter registrar or other appropriate person authorized to receive the application and (ii) intentionally interferes with the applicant's effort to register either by destroying the application or by failing to mail or deliver the application in a timely manner, he shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor."  If I function as a voter registrar in a way that suggests to voters that I will turn in their application for them, and don't, I am guilty of a crime -- in Washington, in Virginia.  I have been doing voter reg for a while now, bro, and everyone knows this.

As to why, because they were duplicates, or at least he thought most of them were.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/worker-for-gop-hired-contractor-charged-with-dumping-va-voter-registration-forms/2012/10/19/86062d7a-19f1-11e2-ad4a-e5a958b60a1e_story.html

There is no indication there that Mr. Small thought they were duplicates -- just that they were.  That article doesn't even say Mr. Small was claiming that.  Also, read it more carefully.  Three of the eight voters were already registered.  One wasn't, but was a felon (did Mr. Small run felony background checks?)  Four were new voters and not duplicates.  Mr. Small is responsible for nearly disenfranchising four people, and there is no reason to assume he knew the other four applications were moot.

The line I assume you'll draw on to defend Mr. Small's applications is this: "If any person intentionally solicits multiple registrations from any one person or intentionally falsifies a registration application, he shall be guilty of a Class 5 felony."  That line does not prohibit submitting applications for those already registered.  It prohibits soliciting someone to register multiple times -- something that submitting a voter registration when you're already registered won't do.  People do that all the time.

Only if the person is a hired third party, which he was.  If someone hands you a voter registration form, and you are not an official (or a letter carrier), you have no obligation to do anything with it.

Demonstrably false.  I doubt that's even true in Pennsylvania.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

I think I'll trust someone who actually knows what they're talking about when it comes to early vote statistics over someone who thinks the Bradley Effect was a thing that happened in 2008, thanks JJ.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

This is now basically the "Brutal Ownage of J. J. Mine"

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

I love this because of how krazen so painted himself into a corner with the Stormfront language:

Registered Democrat 96% 3% 1% 235
Registered Undeclared 80% 11% 9% 295
Registered Republican 90% 4% 6% 207



Lol, junk. This poll does not reflect the war on whites.

krazen, in which universe are Democrats waging a "war on whites?" Think carefully; the answer is not 'reality' or 'this one.'

To quote you liberals and use your logic:

The universe in which a half dozen national pollsters have whites voting Republican by 20 points.



Obviously then, this poll is absurd due to a heavy mispolling of whites. Republicans have a large edge in voter registration in New Hampshire.

Mhm. So that means Republicans are waging a war on blacks, Hispanics, and Vermont, among others. Thank you for clarifying.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

The one who actually knows how to count.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Free market- and allow more Americans access to hazardous substances? I'm as much of a economic liberal as the next guy, but there's a point where the common good and moral imperatives kick in.

Do you want to ban alcohol as well? Oh wait you drink hazardous substances and are a baseless hypocrite who deems what is safe and unsafe and moral and immoral based on a contrived personality.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

What's wrong with being 'provincial'?

That was insufficiently mean, I have to say.

I thought you made such a good job of making an absolute tit out of yourself that outside assistance wasn't really required.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Why does he devote so much time, energy and effort to post such utter drivel? He can't surely believe a word of it (no one, not even a twelve year old posting on a political forum on the internet, could be that stupid), so there must be some other purpose at work here.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Oh, so she's finally come to terms with her lesbianism?

Did you vote for Dole or Buchanan this year?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Even SPC is capable of owning Oldiesfreak.

Who else gets irritated when someone (presumably accidentally) substitutes 'succession' for 'secession'?  

A little.  What annoys me more is when Republicans in states like Texas talk about secession because of Obama when it was Democrats who supported secession because of Lincoln.

Hmm... could that maybe suggest that those Democrats are now Republicans?

Those Democrats are now dead.

Yeah, but would YOU want to support Democrats if you knew about that, no matter how long ago it was?

I'm an advocate of secession, so yes. Unfortunately, the Democratic Party no longer has the platform it did in the 19th century, as everyone except yourself seems to have noticed.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Was just going to post that Al bit.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

You've never needed (or think you've never needed) special education, ESL education, or personalized attention from a teacher, have you?

Well, no, and during great American times such as the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, with booming economic growth, few needed such labor intensive, extremely costly things.

Uh...plenty needed. Few got.  Booming economic growth or no booming economic growth, times were exceptionally un-great for children in this country who spoke English as a second language or had any of a whole host of psychological problems right up until very recently, and by and large still are. The economic wellbeing of America as a whole didn't help these particular children learn, you know. There would be an obvious argument from individualism to be made here if you cared about the individual, but you are on a variety of issues one of the most openly authoritarian-collectivist American rightists I've ever met so I won't bother. I'll only say for the benefit of the rest of the forum that learning disabilities and children who aren't growing up speaking English are not new, damlibrul concepts, even if caring or pretending to care about them in educational policy is, you risible, crypto-Francoist Scrooge.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Got to give credit where it's due on this one:

Oooh thing are getting SPICYYAYAY!

Things should settle back down pretty quickly.  March 1 is just another day on the calendar now.

Wrong. Napoli vs. Juventus.

More important than that, though, March 1 is the eve of my son's 9th birthday.  Felix will be 9 years old on March 2.  (14:00 3/1/2013 in Utah).

Yes... a pathological liar with no self-discipline who is dependent on his parents for money yet still takes time off willy-nilly is exactly the type of person who should adopt children.  I'm sorry, Jeff, but that would be borderline child abuse.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Ha. Memphis burned Gustaf hard.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

He thinks they do... basically, if anything Krazen writes actually makes sense, I'm going to walk in front of a truck.

This is your utopia, champ. High taxes and no guns for the people, monstrous unions, and rampant homosexuality.

That's what you people say you want for all of us.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqQD4dzVkwk

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

You are an impeccably disgusting person.

Considering how rarely Nathan would say something like that...whoa.

However seeing who he is responding to and what he said, I have to say it is quite fitting.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

It's hideous news. Why should gays be allowed to marry when gun rights are not protected.

Because being gay doesn't hurt anyone.

And also because they're, you know, entirely unrelated issues.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Made all the moreso considering it's from Torie, who's usually quite restrained on stuff like this:

The thought of taking money from my parents (who could have easily afforded it while yours cannot I might add) for the sole reason of preserving my credit score, so I can borrow more money later, nausiates me. I would have let mine go to zero first. And poor planning, and poor decisions, got you in this position in the first place, but I digress. I just can't image how your conscience allows you to do this. What the F is wrong with you?