Opinions of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 04, 2024, 04:01:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Opinions of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: So the TVA has long been a subject of political conflict between the Republican and Democratic Political Parties going back to its creation in 1933 under FDR. It was heavily criticized by Republican political leaders for decades among many regions of the
#1
100% Best deal ever both in Historical and Modern Social Context
 
#2
75% Good deal at the time with some flaws both historically and modern era
 
#3
50% Decent deal at the time, but maybe some issues in modern times
 
#4
25% Issues at the time and issues today
 
#5
0% TVA was a bad idea at the time and doesn't work today
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 45

Author Topic: Opinions of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)  (Read 1649 times)
DINGO Joe
dingojoe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,689
United States


« on: June 24, 2019, 12:36:14 AM »

When I saw this thread, I was wondering how many posts it would be before someone referenced Alabama's Song of the South in this thread. Only took 3.

Given it's a NOVA Green thread, I'm a bit shocked it wasn't part of the OP.
Logged
DINGO Joe
dingojoe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,689
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2019, 01:19:45 PM »

All those flooded valleys with their towns and farms were dislocating for people and quite sad even if some argue it was necessary.

Some would argue that the best parts of the South are the ones that were flooded.

Coal slurry retention pond failures,  high prices,  no competition,  yep it's an FDR boondoggle. 0%.

Any utility that has burned coal in the past certainly is struggling with coal pond issue at this point, hardly unique to the TVA.
Necessary at the time, as it brought electrification and economic development to a region of the country that severely needed it. 
However, we need to recognize the TVA for what it is, a power company, more so than a coherent economic development strategy for the region in the 21st century.  Of course, TVA (like all power companies) continues to play a big role in economic development across the region, but the only reason it exists today is so that Southern politicians can have a direct hand in greasing deals by slashing power rates for their favorite campaign contributors.   

Yeah, basically this. 

It did develop an area of the country that would have been difficult to develop otherwise, even if they're filled with racist hicks.  Hard to imagine Huntsville or Knoxville to be anything like they are today without the TVA. 

Somewhere I have a really cool reproduction of a newspaper ad made by a coal company attacking the TVA for being unfair competition and putting coal miners out of work.  Of course, initially the TVA was large scale hydro, which could really only be done with large scale public investment.  Once that was maxed out and demand rose they became a customer of coal which they're now exiting.  The boondoggle part really came with nuclear,  when they spent a ton of money on plants that would never come into existence and the ones that did had huge cost overruns.  Again, you can look at other pubic utilities that made the same errors.

I voted 75%.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.