Who would the media treat worse? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 06:30:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Who would the media treat worse? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Between a Trump and Tulsi Gabbard race, who would the media treat worse?
#1
Trump
 
#2
Gabbard
 
#3
Both equally as bad
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 48

Author Topic: Who would the media treat worse?  (Read 567 times)
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,588


« on: September 23, 2021, 08:57:06 PM »

Gabbard. "The media" don't actually hate Trump. They certainly love the eyeballs reporting on him get them. They have never offered actually damaging reporting, except when its so big they have to cover the story in detail or lose viewers (Access Hollywood, Ukraine, coup attempt). Offering coverage that is  merely repeating the shock-jock's latest attention-grabbing awfulness doesn't actually hurt him. Any coverage that takes him seriously, or treats him as credible, actually helps him.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.