COVID-19 Megathread 6: Return of the Omicron (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 20, 2024, 01:13:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  COVID-19 Megathread 6: Return of the Omicron (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 115

Author Topic: COVID-19 Megathread 6: Return of the Omicron  (Read 541666 times)
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #50 on: November 18, 2020, 11:29:14 AM »

I'm not sure if "I'm 100% right and you're all privileged and rich brats" is a strong concluding argument.

What I stated is literally true.

I just feel like the people here who support stringent lockdowns have like no income to lose or aren't in any danger of evictions, etc. I am not in any danger of that either if there was a stringent shut down. But you can scream 100,000 times that there should be a stimulus. But .. there is not a stimulus right now.. so we have to focus on mitigation measures rather than stringent lockdowns.

Why is the anger directed towards me when until recently, I supported greater mitigation measures than almost any Democratic governor? Throw the anger on your governors. Not me.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #51 on: November 18, 2020, 11:34:49 AM »

What if it took years to make a vaccine? We are damn lucky that we are within days of Pfizer being ready to seek emergency use authorization. But what if we had a pandemic that took 5 years to make a vaccine? Are we really going to be ing caged animals for 5 years?
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #52 on: November 18, 2020, 11:44:55 AM »

Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #53 on: November 18, 2020, 11:54:34 AM »

I'm not sure if "I'm 100% right and you're all privileged and rich brats" is a strong concluding argument.

What I stated is literally true.

I just feel like the people here who support stringent lockdowns have like no income to lose or aren't in any danger of evictions, etc. I am not in any danger of that either if there was a stringent shut down. But you can scream 100,000 times that there should be a stimulus. But .. there is not a stimulus right now.. so we have to focus on mitigation measures rather than stringent lockdowns.

Why is the anger directed towards me when until recently, I supported greater mitigation measures than almost any Democratic governor? Throw the anger on your governors. Not me.

I just think it’s a failure to act on our government’s side. Lockdowns, yes, but we need to provide people and workers basic income if they can’t go to work, assistance to businesses (especially small businesses) to stay afloat and rent/mortgage relief. The government did the bare minimum on this half a year ago and called it a day and that’s a failure on their part.

Well do not take the anger out on me....  Its societies failure not mine. My positions are based on what we have to work with now.

I also see a strong correlation with people who support full on lockdowns do not have a job or income to lose.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #54 on: November 18, 2020, 12:27:24 PM »

What if it took years to make a vaccine? We are damn lucky that we are within days of Pfizer being ready to seek emergency use authorization. But what if we had a pandemic that took 5 years to make a vaccine? Are we really going to be ing caged animals for 5 years?

If we're playing what ifs, what if the virus had  50% kill rate. Would you support lockdowns multi-month lockdowns then?

The economy is already turning down even without the lockdowns. Maybe force of law shouldn't be applied at this point, but people definitely shouldn't be out and gathering if it's not necessary.

Of course I would! But Covid 19 does not have a 50% kill rate. And we currently do not have a stimulus to support millions of workers. You know what would be worse? Having millions homeless due to forced lockdowns.

And I have made it crystal clear I oppose any conventions or large gatherings!

And a point was made by another poster earlier: How the hell does closing down non essential shops help? When it will just make everyone go to big box stores.  Any store, even big box stores, should remain open with occupancy limits.

Edit: If a virus had a 50% fatality rate but was not contagious at all I would of course oppose multi month lockdowns.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #55 on: November 18, 2020, 12:39:53 PM »

Of course I would! But Covid 19 does not have a 50% kill rate.

And the vaccine isn't going to take 5 years. Smiley People are suggesting we just get through this since the vaccine is coming soon.

And I have made it crystal clear I oppose any conventions or large gatherings!

Large and small should be avoided if not necessary.

Yes but there are people willing to throw millions unemployed and with no income for months!

You can blame McConnell all you want but that is the fact of the situation.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #56 on: November 20, 2020, 03:21:43 AM »

I can not wait until this BS is over. I can be in harmony with the left again.

I really only dissent from the left on two issues:

1) Lockdowns

2) Mass gatherings to burn down buildings and riot.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #57 on: November 20, 2020, 02:24:50 PM »

Tomorrow night I am going to work out in gym! And not only that.. I will work out in the middle of the night just to spite the anti-lockdown people!
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #58 on: November 20, 2020, 03:01:46 PM »



Smiley
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #59 on: November 22, 2020, 09:45:01 AM »

I had a great work out in the gym in the middle of the night last night! And this evening I will order take out from subway. But only to spite the pro-lockdown people!
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #60 on: November 22, 2020, 05:22:40 PM »

I had a great work out in the gym in the middle of the night last night! And this evening I will order take out from subway. But only to spite the pro-lockdown people!

Ordering take out from subway to own the libs.

Not to mention, in what remotely logical &/or rational way does ordering take-out even serve to "spite the pro-lockdown people?" Ordering take-out has literally been the recommended method of consuming restaurant food since the start of the pandemic.

I managed to wear a mask the entire time I was working out and refuse to ever eat in a restaurant since the pandemic. I haven't ate in a dining room at a restaurant since February lol
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #61 on: November 22, 2020, 10:40:03 PM »

I had a great work out in the gym in the middle of the night last night! And this evening I will order take out from subway. But only to spite the pro-lockdown people!
Maybe you should re-evaluate your priorities in life. For example, doing things for your own sake instead of doing things for the purpose of spiting others. Just a thought. Take it or leave it.

My personal views are that I will not sit down in a dine in restaurant but I see no reason that the option should be entirely excluded for everyone else.

I would go as far as to shut down bars. They are problematic. 
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #62 on: November 23, 2020, 12:58:51 PM »

Has California banned outdoor gatherings to riot and burn down buildings as well?

Or is that still an exception along with essential grocery store trips to big corporate chains only?
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #63 on: November 23, 2020, 03:01:52 PM »

Please don't believe rumors about me from aad. I do not tie up and tickle guys.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #64 on: November 23, 2020, 04:55:30 PM »

I support mask mandates. Supported them in spring.

No conventions. Until well into next year.

Closure of bars except take out.

Restaurants outdoor dining and take out only. I guess I can buy into very limited indoor dining.

Spa Services allowed with PPE

And a small stimulus to make up lost wages of the fewer impacted workers than the national lockdown would create.

Yet I am the crazy out of control psycho?
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #65 on: November 25, 2020, 12:51:38 PM »

I'm okay to pass a mini stimulus for lost wages in case some states have to lock down but nothing more.

I'm not trying to encourage states to lock down.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #66 on: November 27, 2020, 07:59:12 PM »

I know I went to far with the tone of my posts last week. But my positions of covid19 mitigation measures remain the same.

Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #67 on: December 01, 2020, 02:49:39 AM »

Watch this

https://youtu.be/LlQX4fmRrpI
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #68 on: December 11, 2020, 08:01:30 PM »

Yeah, complete and utter .... Sure lockdowns add some risks, they also take away others (traffic and workplace accidents). I won't pretend to know which way the balance goes, but to pretend that it significant in either direction is very questionable. In Belgium excess deaths track very strongly with reported Covid deaths. If the effects of lockdowns have a significant influence, we'd expect the excess deaths to fall slower than Covid deaths. (As the lockdown lowers case numbers, Covid deaths go down, but "lockdown" deaths go up). This simply does not happen.

I always love seeing "lack of medical care" in those lists of the risks of lockdowns as well. Medical systems do not delay procedures because there is a lockdown. They delay other medical procedures because they are overburdened by Covid cases. Lockdowns make sure capacity in the medical system remains available for other medical issues.

Of course, I'm not sure why I'm even trying to argue with someone who jumps straight to "conspiracies by the global capitalist elite"

I am not supporting any lockdowns any further after much thinking.

1) We created a massive stimulus bill last March. At that time we had the tools, financial help and resources we needed to have a hard lockdown in the United States. If we would have done a hard lock down at that time we would not have these problems today. Sure by now there would be a "surge" but only like 20 to 30k cases a day. Not 250k cases a day. We could have reopened in July under mitigated measures once the virus spread was nearly eradicated. But we wasted an entire lockdown and wasted literally trillions of dollars. I am not willing to waste more.

2) Any further lockdowns now create an untenable situation. Unlike the spring there is no financial help anymore and this time a hard lock down would actually create the massive fears the anti-lockdown people have.

3) Seeing Republicans openly defy mitigations and mask mandates makes me question the effectiveness of a national lockdown. All it would do is damage blue state economies while doing very little to reduce the virus spread.

Given how people are now defying common sense public health standards I have zero sympathy if they get covid 19.

Not to mention that even vaccination of only elderly and vulnerable people would make a huge difference in the fatality rate of covid-19 and would go a long way back to normalcy.

Also we can debate the pros and cons of the United States lack of a robust welfare system and an economy that is heavily based on a service economy but those two factors have made it nearly impossible to have effective lockdowns in the United States. Along with federalism.

Irrespective what you think of levels of welfare spending, consumerism, and federalism it can not denied that they have been major hindrances in controlling the virus.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #69 on: December 12, 2020, 02:10:17 AM »

I have given up.

I will just wait for herd immunity through large number of cases and vaccinations. I now encourage everyone to go out and not wear a mask so the vaccine trails can be expedited.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #70 on: December 12, 2020, 04:27:10 AM »

I have given up.

I will just wait for herd immunity through large number of cases and vaccinations. I now encourage everyone to go out and not wear a mask so the vaccine trails can be expedited.

The major vaccine trials are completed. Pfizer vaccine just got approved. Now it has to be mass manufactured be distributed, and you should wear a mask so you don't inadvertently infect others in the meantime who are waiting for the vaccine.

ill wear a mask of course.

I am just frustrated  and have conceded to the virus at this point
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #71 on: December 12, 2020, 07:13:51 PM »

I have given up.

I will just wait for herd immunity through large number of cases and vaccinations. I now encourage everyone to go out and not wear a mask so the vaccine trails can be expedited.

The major vaccine trials are completed. Pfizer vaccine just got approved. Now it has to be mass manufactured be distributed, and you should wear a mask so you don't inadvertently infect others in the meantime who are waiting for the vaccine.

ill wear a mask of course.

I am just frustrated  and have conceded to the virus at this point
At this point I understand that.
While I don’t agree, I have sometimes pondered whether I should even care about if other people get sick. I only care now because it increases my risk of exposure.

I made a point earlier that last spring and summer we had resources to actually control and tame the virus but we wasted it. Now we are at a point of no return and will just have to deal with it.

The service economy dominance of the United States has made this an impossible fight.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #72 on: December 13, 2020, 03:19:22 AM »

Vaccinating the people in nursing homes alone will have a major effect. That combined with protecting health care workers will help with the hospital capacity crunch a ton.

I also wonder at what level do things start to drop on their own. Seems like the Dakotas are hitting some kind of natural slowdown where the virus is having a harder time spreading. It is still lingering but cases and hospitilzations have really fallen off in ND.

Of course both states have some advantages in their lack of density.

shhhhh few people want to acknowledge this.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #73 on: December 16, 2020, 02:44:17 PM »

Maybe long term there will be rethinking of the highly service based economy of The United States. It has clearly made this pandemic impossible to control especially with the lack of a robust social service infrastructure of the United States.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,532


« Reply #74 on: December 17, 2020, 02:56:40 PM »

Congratulations rural Trump America. You have done the near impossible. Cause a virus to spread out of control in rural communities nation wide.

In rural communities simple common sense would have prevented this.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 10 queries.