Quinnipiac SHOCK POLL in GA: Warnock +10

[Politician]

Lol. To anyone who believes this, here's what Quinnipiac had two years ago:

https://talkelections.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=384252.0

[Politician]

Also of note here is that Warnock's favorability is 49/37, while Walker's is underwater at 37/42. Even if you even those out a bit, +12 and -5 are still very far away from each other.

Wbrock, honest question: do you truly believe Warnock is currently leading by 10 points?

No candidate is winning by more than 3 or 4 points in this election, IMO. In order for a Warnock+10 result, you’d need a massive number of Trump voters to be voting Warnock. That’s not happening

Fwiw, Greg bluestein says dem operatives are calling him and laughing about the poll.

He literally was trying to unskew the Q poll with Biden +13 in FL as being biased towards Republicans. What do you think?

Anyway, most university polls are complete bunk and should be disregarded entirely. There is no universe where Warnock wins by 10 and Whitmer wins by 37 but Republicans pick up seats such as RI-2 and are up 5 on the generic ballot.

[Politician]

Also of note here is that Warnock's favorability is 49/37, while Walker's is underwater at 37/42. Even if you even those out a bit, +12 and -5 are still very far away from each other.

Wbrock, honest question: do you truly believe Warnock is currently leading by 10 points?

No candidate is winning by more than 3 or 4 points in this election, IMO. In order for a Warnock+10 result, you’d need a massive number of Trump voters to be voting Warnock. That’s not happening

Fwiw, Greg bluestein says dem operatives are calling him and laughing about the poll.

He literally was trying to unskew the Q poll with Biden +13 in FL as being biased towards Republicans. What do you think?

Anyway, most university polls are complete bunk and should be disregarded entirely. There is no universe where Warnock wins by 10 and Whitmer wins by 37 but Republicans pick up seats such as RI-2 and are up 5 on the generic ballot.

You seem a little too obsessed with my posts and don't seem to be interested in actual nuanced conversation, so

(also no one believes Whitmer was up 37, that poll was clearly just about name rec and her being over 50, but again, that requires more nuance than you're clearly willing to give)

I mean, if you just pick Democrats to win every competitive race, you're going to get some right for sure.