Which of the following would you consider to be theft? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2024, 02:58:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Which of the following would you consider to be theft? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which of the following would you consider to be theft?
#1
Private property
 
#2
Rent
 
#3
Profit
 
#4
Taxation
 
#5
Looting stores
 
#6
None of the above
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 65

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Which of the following would you consider to be theft?  (Read 1499 times)
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,448
Norway


P P P

« on: September 27, 2020, 07:10:24 PM »

Out of these options, only looting should be considered theft. Taxation is more of a gray area in that, say, a 100% tax would clearly be theft but taxation as presently structured in developed countries is not "theft" the way ancaps and some libertarians say it is.

Profit and private property are also gray areas. While not inherently theft, and while necessary political goods, I take the same position as these gentlemen:

Quote from: St. Basil the Great
The money you hoard you stole from the poor, the unused clothes in your closet you stole from the naked, and those rotting shoes in your closet you stole from the needy.
Quote from: St. John Chrysostom
The rich are in possession of the goods of the poor, even if they have acquired them honestly or inherited them legally.
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,448
Norway


P P P

« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2020, 08:23:58 PM »

Private property cannot in and of itself be theft. Land could be considered theft - that you own something you did not make merely by existing there. There’s a very strong case for philosophical Georgism - the taxation of land because land is originally a public resource that must be “rented” by its owner to the government, the sole representative of the whole public.

Georgism is a great political philosophy, but would be impossible to implement as government cannot reasonably be expected to function on a single source of tax revenue.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.