Census population estimates 2011-2019 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 04:00:13 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Census population estimates 2011-2019 (search mode)
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Census population estimates 2011-2019  (Read 183862 times)
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,018


« Reply #25 on: December 30, 2019, 11:53:20 AM »

The Northeast region as a whole lost population last year.    10 states lost population too,  one higher than last year. 

New York lost almost 77k people, does that mean it'll lose two congressional districts?

Its looking extremely likely at this point.

And one could make the argument that both seats should come at the expense of Upstate New York.

How does that math work when NYC + LI + Westchester have been growing at half the rate of the country, if even that much? I would think that they can no longer support more than 15 districts.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,018


« Reply #26 on: December 30, 2019, 12:40:08 PM »

Since I have 2018 estimates for population, let's (wrongly) assume that losses in 2019 and 2020 are evenly distributed across the state and NY loses 2 districts. 19,530,000 / 25 seats = 781k per district

Nassau + Suffolk = 3.6 seats
Nassau + Suffolk + Queens = 6.5 seats which is pretty much the current map, no?
LI + NYC = 14.3 seats - which is 1 seat overpopulated
LI + NYC + Westchester + Rockland = almost exactly 16 seats, again 1 seat overpopulated

Something's got to go in Brooklyn, Manhattan, or possibly the Bronx.

Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,018


« Reply #27 on: December 30, 2019, 04:52:11 PM »

Considering the fact that The Establishment in NY hates AOC, NY-14 would probably be the obvious cut no?

The 2 biggest issues there are that it is a predominantly Hispanic majority-minority seat (and the Hispanic population has been growing, not shrinking) and if NY-14 were cut, AOC would simply run in whichever district overlapped the most. And I doubt any other incumbents really want to be paired in a primary against her. So they will probably try to find an incumbent that is about ready to retire anyway and just have them retire (there are a bunch in their 70s and even 80s). Jose Serrano is not running for re-election in NY-15 (neighboring Hispanic district).

Another thing to note - a side effect of all this is that Max Rose's NY-11 is going to have to pick up some significant extra population/area, which should be able to make it safe Democratic. In particular if (as they should) they give it some more heavily Dem parts of Brooklyn (Park Slope probably being the most obvious/easy) and give some of the more competitive/R parts to the majority-minority districts that are going to be needing more population.

The easiest path is for Nadler to retire or to have a fair fight with Carolyn Maloney. It feels unlikely they’d be pitted against each other.

The Harlem district isn’t really an African-American district any more.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,018


« Reply #28 on: January 01, 2020, 12:17:26 PM »

California
Texas
Florida
New York
Pennsylvania
Illinois
Ohio
Georgia
North Carolina
Michigan
New Jersey
Virginia
Washington
Arizona
Massachusetts
Tennessee
Indiana
Missouri
Maryland
Wisconsin
Colorado
Minnesota
South Carolina
Alabama
Louisiana
Kentucky
Oregon
Oklahoma
Connecticut
Utah
Iowa
Nevada
Arkansas
Mississippi
Kansas
New Mexico
Nebraska
West Virginia
Idaho
Hawaii
New Hampshire
Maine
Montana
Rhode Island
Delaware
South Dakota
North Dakota
Alaska
Vermont
Wyoming
39,512,223
28,995,881
21,477,737
19,453,561
12,801,989
12,671,821
11,689,100
10,617,423
10,488,084
9,986,857
8,882,190
8,535,519
7,614,893
7,278,717
6,892,503
6,829,174
6,732,219
6,137,428
6,045,680
5,822,434
5,758,736
5,639,632
5,148,714
4,903,185
4,648,794
4,467,673
4,217,737
3,956,971
3,565,287
3,205,958
3,155,070
3,080,156
3,017,825
2,976,149
2,913,314
2,096,829
1,934,408
1,792,147
1,787,065
1,415,872
1,359,711
1,344,212
1,068,778
1,059,361
973,764
884,659
762,062
731,545
623,989
578,759
52.589
35.497
26.545
27.355
17.932
18.113
16.285
13.677
13.461
13.953
12.411
11.294
9.493
9.024
9.243
8.959
9.153
8.454
8.150
8.028
7.100
7.487
6.529
6.748
6.400
6.126
5.408
5.296
5.045
3.902
4.301
3.812
4.116
4.190
4.028
2.907
2.578
2.616
2.213
1.920
1.858
1.875
1.397
1.486
1.268
1.149
0.949
1.003
0.883
0.796
52.476
38.510
28.525
25.836
17.002
16.830
15.524
14.101
13.929
13.264
11.797
11.336
10.113
9.667
9.154
9.070
8.941
8.151
8.029
7.733
7.648
7.490
6.838
6.512
6.174
5.934
5.602
5.255
4.735
4.258
4.190
4.091
4.008
3.953
3.869
2.785
2.569
2.380
2.373
1.880
1.806
1.785
1.419
1.407
1.293
1.175
1.012
0.972
0.829
0.769
Goodbye 53rd
Good for gain of 3
Good for 2
27th is gone, 26th hanging on
18th is gone
18th is long gone
Will just slip blow the threshold, goodbye 16th

14th is guaranteed
14th is gone
12th could be lost in 2030
Falls short of 12th

10th is certain


Could save 9th in 2030


8th safe for now, but most likely gone in 2030
Guaranteed 8th
Highly likely loss of 8th

Farewell 7th


6th all but certain

5th could be lost in 2030







3rd safe for now
3rd is history
Possible 3rd in 2030



2nd likely
Loss of 2nd all but guaranteed



Looks like LA could be at risk of losing LA-06 at the 2030 census?

If Oregon is getting a 6th district at 5.602, wouldn't that require a much faster rate of decline in LA than we saw since 2010?

That said, a major hit to New Orleans is a distinct possibility in this decade.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,018


« Reply #29 on: April 09, 2020, 08:27:19 PM »

I would be shocked if OH didn't lose a congressional seat this cycle. Also, I think VA might actually gain another electoral vote, as NOVA is historically undercounted, but it'll be a close call.

Why are people hyping up NOVA's growth when VA has not gained a EV in a very long time? If NOVA was another Atlanta, Phoenix, Dallas or Houston then VA would be gaining EV's like AZ, TX, FL or GA.

Consider that those are all major metro areas located entirely in their states while NoVa represents, at best, 50% of one metro area minus the central city.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,018


« Reply #30 on: July 18, 2020, 11:23:47 AM »

Quote
In 2021, there may be an emphasis on creating a districts that would be by a Hispanic candidate, essentially pairing Karen Bass and Maxine Waters.

By which we mean a candidate of the Hispanic community's choice, not necessarily a Hispanic candidate.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,018


« Reply #31 on: December 22, 2020, 06:20:22 PM »

Do we really believe North Dakota's population hasn't declined at all since its surge?
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,018


« Reply #32 on: January 19, 2021, 05:11:05 PM »

The idea of California shedding multiple seats to other states is quite a paradigm shift but I can see how it could happen. Especially since it’s one of the first states to start to suffer significantly from climate change.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 8 queries.