Democratic Super Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 06:49:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Super Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democratic Super Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET)  (Read 43853 times)
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« on: March 01, 2016, 06:58:38 PM »

Way to low for AL, Dems there should be blacker than SC.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2016, 08:11:24 PM »

Winning as many states as possible is better than winning as more delegates with a spread out vote when you have little chance to win, so I'd be ok with these results. More chance of being remembered/getting media attention.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2016, 08:16:57 PM »

SANDERS SWEEPING RURAL OK
Cheesy
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2016, 08:36:36 PM »

Sanders back ahead in MA.
I didn't expect TX to be so pro-Clinton with OK going the way it was.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #4 on: March 01, 2016, 08:40:13 PM »

OK Dems a habit of voting for candidates who aren't running.
Sanders in the lead there, too.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2016, 08:51:27 PM »

Tulsa flipped to Sanders, if that stays Sanders wins OK.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #6 on: March 01, 2016, 09:01:57 PM »

Sanders up in Boston! Sanders winning a big city? Yuge!
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #7 on: March 01, 2016, 09:12:49 PM »

CNN has adjusted to a clinton lead in MA on their exit poll Cry
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #8 on: March 01, 2016, 09:23:43 PM »

Hillary may end up with only a single county in OK. Dayum.
Clinton down to 2 there now. Sanders was equally wiped out county wise in TN, AL, GA, yet with far stronger margins for Clinton. Urban areas are destroying him in those states.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #9 on: March 01, 2016, 09:25:08 PM »

Why? States like OK are basically the exact opposite of a bellweather for dems. Doesn't increase his chance of winning in the slightest.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #10 on: March 01, 2016, 09:49:42 PM »

Sanders doing alright in CO. Could Denver could save Clinton like other major cities?
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #11 on: March 01, 2016, 10:00:03 PM »

How is Bernie doing so well in OK? I was of the understanding OK Dems were fairly conservative.
That's the reason why Sanders won in OK. He won conservative dems by 30 points.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #12 on: March 01, 2016, 10:00:45 PM »

Speaking of OK, Sanders has taken all but one county!
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #13 on: March 01, 2016, 10:02:47 PM »

Unlike every other state, Sanders is leading in CO's suburbs. That's a great sign for him there.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #14 on: March 01, 2016, 10:28:06 PM »

Clinton leading in Denver Sad
Sanders can't catch a break in cities.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #15 on: March 01, 2016, 11:55:23 PM »

The benchmark in VT was for him to win by margins that would be  out of the reach of most dictators.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #16 on: March 02, 2016, 12:01:55 AM »

FEEL THE (CLINTON) BURN! PLUS IT WILL ONLY GONNA GET STRONGER!
Demographically, the Clinton burn will be stronger today than at any other time. She can look forward to getting these margins in MS, LA, and DC, but nowhere else.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #17 on: March 02, 2016, 12:14:55 AM »

I know it's only by 0.1% but, in a race he's loosing by 34.1 points, why is Sanders leading in Austin?

Austin is the Portland (or Asheville?) of Texas. It should honestly be a huge disappointment for Sanders that he's not doing better there.
Sanders is underperforming in virtually every urban area.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #18 on: March 02, 2016, 12:44:59 AM »

Sanders "underperforming" his target in VT is literally meaningless since it resulted in 0 change of delegates. And it's not as if the media will call VT a disappointment for Sanders.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #19 on: March 02, 2016, 02:24:27 AM »
« Edited: March 02, 2016, 02:31:15 AM by New Canadaland »

God we should just let Sanders win to allow Progressive Canadian and Jfrern to ramble in peace

Smiley
I'd prefer it that way, and that goes for the Shillbots and the Sandernistas. I just don't want to see infighting in the party.

Also: Sanders hits >60% in MN. He'll need CO/MN type victories in almost every northern state if he was to win, which I don't see happening.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 11 queries.