Republicans need this type of voice (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 09:34:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Republicans need this type of voice (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Republicans need this type of voice  (Read 6426 times)
Nixon in '80
nixon1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,308
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: -5.39

« on: December 10, 2008, 06:48:40 PM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Y5_q-rWMkg

then from 2001 to 2009, we had Republican leadership that carried a strong message of freedom, democracy, ect.


No, actually you didn't. That's why your party lost by 10 million votes this past election.
Logged
Nixon in '80
nixon1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,308
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: -5.39

« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2008, 01:05:08 AM »

LOL. NO. SORRY. He doesn't even BEGIN to compare to Roosevelt. Our greatest of all Presidents. The top five of the 20th century are as goes...

1. Roosevelt
2. Johnson
3. Carter.
4. George H. W. Bush
5. Truman

Johnson number two HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Sorry, I don't know what came over me. Seriously though, Bush at number four... I wouldn't put him that high, and he was just about right in line with me ideologically.
Logged
Nixon in '80
nixon1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,308
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: -5.39

« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2008, 01:51:09 AM »

I think you're missing the point of this thread.  Naso is talking about the"voice" the GOP needs, and the video shows how the last 3 Republican Presidents were able to communicate effectively.   

If the Democratic Party had nominated far superior candidates rather than Jimmy Carter, Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis there is a very good chance that both Reagan and Bush could have been defeated. It might be wishful thinking on my behalf, but you Republicans have those nominees of the Democratic Party to thank for your "greatest" President's.


Seriously! The Democrats practically handed the GOP the Presidency in the '80s with those weak candidates.

They weren't that weak. I mean, Carter was a President of the United States, Mondale was an experienced Senator and former Vice President, and Dukakis...well...he was the Massachusetts "Miracle" and a Governor.

I actually think that Bush Sr. could have been re-elected back in 1992 had he run his re-election campaign more like his son did in 2004. It would have been close, but he could have pulled it off. He didn't really seem to wanna even try.

How could it have been close? Clinton won by over five million votes.

In the case of the 1992 election, the numbers lie... it was pretty close.
Logged
Nixon in '80
nixon1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,308
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: -5.39

« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2008, 02:07:36 AM »

Wow...George H.W. Bush could have been President still in 1997...strange.

Yeah, for nineteen and a half days, then President Dole!

Quayle

Gore
Logged
Nixon in '80
nixon1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,308
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: -5.39

« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2008, 09:44:47 PM »

LOL. NO. SORRY. He doesn't even BEGIN to compare to Roosevelt. Our greatest of all Presidents. The top five of the 20th century are as goes...

1. Roosevelt
2. Johnson
3. Carter.
4. George H. W. Bush
5. Truman

Which Roosevelt? Douchebag #1 FDR or Douche #2 TR?

I assume he's talking about Douchebag #1, although I'm pretty sure you knew that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 8 queries.