Does 2004 show that Dem panicking over the Rio Grande Valley is overblown? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 06:38:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Does 2004 show that Dem panicking over the Rio Grande Valley is overblown? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Does 2004 show that Dem panicking over the Rio Grande Valley is overblown?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 53

Author Topic: Does 2004 show that Dem panicking over the Rio Grande Valley is overblown?  (Read 3265 times)
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,872


« on: October 23, 2021, 02:01:01 AM »
« edited: October 23, 2021, 02:05:17 AM by kwabbit »

It's hard to say. Biden's approval with Hispanics seemingly indicates that they are no longer so loyal with the Democratic party. If Republicans win 45% of the Hispanic vote in 2022 I would not be surprised.

But we have yet to see conclusive evidence of shifting in actual elections. The CA recall showed some gains among rural/non major metro Hispanics for the GOP but also losses among urban Hispanics. The NM special election was also a strong result for Democrats. Results from NJ and VA's heavily Hispanic areas will tell the story further, but it's going to be a question mark until 2022. I don't think either race will say enough where either the 'Hispanics just love incumbents' or 'Hispanics are trending R' arguments can be dismissed.

I just went through the VA poll crosstabs and Hispanics aren't a big enough group to have their own crosstab sadly so it's hard to track.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.