The Economic Value of the Space Program
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 10:15:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  The Economic Value of the Space Program
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Economic Value of the Space Program  (Read 805 times)
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 24, 2009, 03:27:12 AM »

The Economic Value of the Space Program (corrected version)
July 20th, 2009

Sigh. I had to retract and redo the original post, in light of some absolutely correct comments. The original version of the post is at the bottom, so you can see the problems. I clearly overstated my case there. Sorry about that--MM

Yes, let us celebrate the 40th anniversary of the Apollo moon landing, an amazing human achievement.

But even as it lifts our spirits, let us ask a different, more mundane question: What was the long-term economic value of the spending on the Apollo program? The amounts spent were enormous. Consider this: From 1962 to 1972, when the last Apollo mission landed on the moon, space-related activities got 59% of nondefense government R&D spending. That was $176 billion (inflation-adjusted in 2009 dollars).

What did we get in return? The space program was one of the original big customers for integrated circuits in their infancy, helping give them a big boost. And here’s a long list of other spinoffs from the space program.

However, there are two points to remember. First, one key spinoff that we did not get was a viable private manned space industry, at least so far. One is developing, but it’s not there yet. And the government manned space program has limped along since the Apollo program.

The other problem is that while we were spending at a rapid pace on space travel, we didn't put money into R&D in other key areas like energy and natural resources. (This omission had real consequences during the energy crisis of the 1970s).

President Kennedy acknowledged as much in his 1961 speech where he committed the U.S. to the goal of "landing a man on the moon." Kennedy said:

    This decision demands a major national commitment of scientific and technical manpower, material and facilities, and the possibility of their diversion from other important activities where they are already thinly spread.

Let me be clear here—I don't think the moon landing was a bad idea. To the contrary--I'm glad we did it. And yes, the money spent on the moon program helped stimulate innovation.

But as an economist, I have to wonder whether the same R&D money, spent in other ways, could have had a bigger impact. That's a hypothetical question that we'll never know the answer to. But it would sure have been nice if the investment in the Apollo program had led to a viable private manned space industry in fewer than 40 years.

40th Anniversary, Apollo Mission, Apollo Moon, Apollo Program, Economic Value, Energy Crisis, Human Achievement, Integrated Circuits, Key Areas, Man On The Moon, Manned Space Program, Moon Space, National Commitment, President Kennedy, Rapid Pace, Space Industry, Space Travel, Spinoff, Spinoffs, Technical Manpower
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.