Nixon vs. Humphrey vs. Wallace 1968, with a twist......
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 11:46:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  Nixon vs. Humphrey vs. Wallace 1968, with a twist......
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Nixon vs. Humphrey vs. Wallace 1968, with a twist......  (Read 912 times)
President Mitt
Giovanni
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,347
Samoa


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 19, 2009, 10:31:29 AM »

Nixon does not pursue a "Southern Strategy", focusing on a white backlash, but instead focuses on a coalition combining Nelson Rockefeller's "Responsible Republicanism" and Dwight Eisenhower's "Modern Republicanism", focusing on a coalition of:

Catholics, Big Business, Intellectuals, Small Businessmen, and Suburbia.

My guess on how he did the above was to advocate school vouchers (Catholics), retaining traditional Republican conservatism (Big Business), advocating Scientific research, and Government part in education (Intellectuals), and the ever needed tax cut (Small business).

George Wallace and Hubert Humphrey remain the same.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2009, 04:42:50 PM »
« Edited: August 05, 2009, 06:06:24 PM by Thomas E. Dewey »

Nixon was extremely politically shrewd, perhaps moreso than any Presidential nominee in history.  He knew that the southern stragegy was his most direct and effective path to the White House.

To not pursue the southern strategy could have thrown the election into the House, resulting in Humphrey winning the Presidency. 

However, with the states that Nixon actually did win, and with the scenario you describe, I do not see why Nixon would lose any of the non southern states he actually won in real life.  In fact, with your scenario, Nixon may have actually increased his margin in many of the states he did win. 

With your scenario, there is a distinct possibility that Nixon would have lost North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee to Wallace, which would have left him with 270 electoral votes, barely enough to win, however, just enough to win the Presidency outright.

Nixon still wins Kentucky, Virginia, and Florida, even with the lack of a southern strategy.  These are states that would not go for Wallace regardless.   

Nixon                      270
Humphrey                191
Wallace                    77



Another possibility in this scenario, Nixon could actually pick up Maryland and Washington.

Nixon                     289
Humphrey               172
Wallace                   77 



Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 13 queries.