Does Obama stand a chance in Michigan?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 06:06:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Does Obama stand a chance in Michigan?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
Poll
Question: Will Obama lose Michigan?
#1
Only if Romney is the nominee
 
#2
He will get owned
 
#3
Michigan is Democrat now and forever
 
#4
It'll be close
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 66

Author Topic: Does Obama stand a chance in Michigan?  (Read 7427 times)
ej2mm15
electoraljew2
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 986
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 17, 2009, 03:21:59 PM »
« edited: July 17, 2009, 03:24:05 PM by electoraljew2 »

Seriously. The state has the highest un-employment in the country and it is growing and I doubt that they still are so pro Obama now that it is still getting worse. If The economy stays the way it is or even gets slightly better Obama will lose. Tops if Romney becomes the nominee I am fully prepared to stick on a label saying

"Safe Republican"
Logged
DariusNJ
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 414


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2009, 03:28:37 PM »

No, Michigan will still lean Democrat by a couple of percentage points.

The 2008 result was an anomaly, but there's no way it'll be safe Republican in the near future. There's Detroit, Flint, Ann Arbor, Lansing, etc that provides a strong base of support for any Democrat. Plus, the suburbs of Detroit are a lot bluer now than they were 15-20 years ago.

That's not to say a Republican can't win obviously, but there's no evidence that suggests that Michigan will be a strong Republican state in 2012.
Logged
pogo stick
JewishConservative
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,429
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2009, 03:29:06 PM »

It'll be a close, but clear Obama victory.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2009, 03:47:06 PM »

If the economy is still as bad as it is now, Obama will lose Michigan, unless Republicans nominate someone really bad. If it get's a little better, it will be close. If Michigan actually get's better, and maybe go below double-digit unemployment, it will be safe for Obama.
Logged
Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese
JOHN91043353
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,570
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2009, 04:14:56 PM »
« Edited: July 17, 2009, 04:17:01 PM by Swedish Cheese »

I can see it happen if...
 
...Obama is murdered right before the election, nobody cares cause he has approval ratings in 11%, an amendment that allows foreginers to be president is passed during his term, Granholm runs as the Dem nominee now that Barack is dead against Romney or Pawlenty, the economy is even worse.

Tongue

Joke aside, Michigan is kind of like the Democrats' Texas. It might switch, but Obama would need to fail big time for it to happen and the Republicans would need a a strong candidate, and even then it would be close. 

We Dems like to think that Texas will be won by us, and the GOP that Michigan will come to them, but it's not likely to happen for a while. Although I wouldn't mind to see a Republican win Michigan in 2012 as long as we get Texas instead >Smiley


 
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 17, 2009, 04:36:08 PM »

This is kinda like asking if the GOP nominee in 2012 stands a chance in Kentucky (a state that was closer in 2008 than Michigan was).
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 17, 2009, 04:45:41 PM »

This is kinda like asking if the GOP nominee in 2012 stands a chance in Kentucky (a state that was closer in 2008 than Michigan was).
The economy tanking before the election is what caused it. Minus all the economic problems our country faced in the final 2 months before the election, Michigan would have been closer. A lot of MI voters were just voting for something different, and they could very well do that again in 2012.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,939


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 17, 2009, 04:50:35 PM »

This thread is stupid. He won the state by 17 points. Even if the election had been an even 50-50 election, Obama still wound have won MI comfortably.
Logged
ej2mm15
electoraljew2
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 986
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 17, 2009, 05:07:53 PM »

Do pple forget that McCain was ahead in  the state as recently as Spring 08? Smiley
Logged
Farage
Elvis Republican
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 419
Cape Verde


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 17, 2009, 05:46:03 PM »

I think that Grandholm in michigan is like kathleen blanco in louisiana. Because of her, the dems may lose ground in the future in michigan. BTW lots of rednecks and reagan democrats live in macomb county and all accross the state. Maybe with a gop victory in the governor elections, Michigan may become republican's virginia or indiana ...
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 17, 2009, 06:20:27 PM »

This thread is stupid. He won the state by 17 points. Even if the election had been an even 50-50 election, Obama still wound have won MI comfortably.

The thread is about 2012.
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,531
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 17, 2009, 07:34:39 PM »

Do pple forget that McCain was ahead in  the state as recently as Spring 08? Smiley

Do people forget that in Spring 08 the Democratic primary battle was still going strong and many Clinton voters were still claiming they'd jump ship if she wasn't the nominee?  Perhaps they also forgot Obama did virtually no campaigning there until after the primary was completely over since he wasn't on the Michigan primary ballot.

Seriously though, I don't see how the Michigan voters are going to turn against the Democrats when the Democrats are still so pro-union and they just bailed out the state's biggest industry.  Unless Obama makes driving a car illegal he's going to win Michigan.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 17, 2009, 07:40:35 PM »

A lot of Republicans were shocked when Granholm won by double-digits in 2006, although voters "blamed her for the bad economy." Fact is, a lot of unemployment means a lot of people receiving benefits provided by Democratic legislation. We will carry Michigan again by blaming those responsible for the economic collapse- the very conservative corporate bosses.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,939


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 17, 2009, 08:24:19 PM »

This thread is stupid. He won the state by 17 points. Even if the election had been an even 50-50 election, Obama still wound have won MI comfortably.

The thread is about 2012.

Yes. If a candidate wins a state by 17 points in one election, then he surely at least has "a chance" at winning that state again in the next election and will likely win it again. There's no reason why there would be a 30 point swing in the state.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 17, 2009, 08:29:24 PM »

Is Michigan a Republican's wet dream or something?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 17, 2009, 11:26:27 PM »

This thread is stupid. He won the state by 17 points. Even if the election had been an even 50-50 election, Obama still wound have won MI comfortably.

The thread is about 2012.

Yes. If a candidate wins a state by 17 points in one election, then he surely at least has "a chance" at winning that state again in the next election and will likely win it again. There's no reason why there would be a 30 point swing in the state.

You were addressing it as if it was about 2008 by using the past tense.

Sure he has a chance but you then go on to say he'd win it comfortably.

How the hell can you say he's likely to win it again so soon? Sure there's a reason why there would be a swing - if the economy is still in the toilet or if it gets even worse. People around here need to stop thinking that politics is governed by trend rules.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 17, 2009, 11:41:13 PM »

Is Michigan a Republican's wet dream or something?

Yep, along with Minnesota, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire...l
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,939


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 17, 2009, 11:46:14 PM »

Is Michigan a Republican's wet dream or something?

Yep, along with Minnesota, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire...l

Suffice it to say, they go through a lot of sheets.

This thread is stupid. He won the state by 17 points. Even if the election had been an even 50-50 election, Obama still wound have won MI comfortably.

The thread is about 2012.

Yes. If a candidate wins a state by 17 points in one election, then he surely at least has "a chance" at winning that state again in the next election and will likely win it again. There's no reason why there would be a 30 point swing in the state.

You were addressing it as if it was about 2008 by using the past tense.

Sure he has a chance but you then go on to say he'd win it comfortably.

How the hell can you say he's likely to win it again so soon? Sure there's a reason why there would be a swing - if the economy is still in the toilet or if it gets even worse. People around here need to stop thinking that politics is governed by trend rules.

Not saying it's likely he'll win it again (though I think the odds are better that he'll win it than he'll lose it in 2012), but to say that there's no chance he'll win a state he won by 17 points in the last election, or that a state that has voted D for 16 years now and was D+10 in 2008 is suddenly SAFE REPUBLICAN is just ridiculous.
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 18, 2009, 12:49:30 AM »

2008 was an unusual year. Under other circumstances it would've been about the same as Minnesota and Pennsylvania in terms of voting.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: July 18, 2009, 01:20:03 AM »
« Edited: July 18, 2009, 07:55:59 AM by Keystone Phil »


Not saying it's likely he'll win it again

...but...you did.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Totally agree

I hate the arrogance on both sides when it comes to the future political landscape.
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,643
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: July 18, 2009, 01:26:17 AM »

Obama will most likely win Michigan, I don't think there is much doubt about this. I don't see people in the state that voted for Kerry, going over and voting for the party that said no to the GM bailouts. So far the GM bailouts aren't really popular in Michigan but they are much more popular than in the rest of the country. Most likely the company will begin to rebound in some way, along with the state's economy during the next four years. Most likely the GOP candidate will have said something about the bailout that would look poor in a Democratic attack ad.

I am not saying that the Democrats have a lock here but they have a good chance of holding the state.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: July 18, 2009, 01:34:22 AM »

Something in me thinks that Obama might "stand a chance" in Michigan.  I don't know what it is.  I guess I'm just a reckless prognosticator.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: July 18, 2009, 01:39:38 AM »

Of course he does.
Logged
the artist formerly known as catmusic
catmusic
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,180
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.16, S: -7.91

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: July 18, 2009, 03:15:37 AM »

Of course he will win, unless his approval is below 35%.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,839
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: July 18, 2009, 10:27:51 PM »

Romney makes it closer; Palin, Huckabee, Gingrich, and Barbour will be disasters in Michigan -- but such will be the least of their concerns.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.063 seconds with 14 queries.