Flores v. Arizona
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 05:20:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Flores v. Arizona
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Flores v. Arizona  (Read 3754 times)
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 25, 2009, 01:54:14 PM »

From the Arizona Daily Star:

Supreme Court eases Ariz. rules on English learner funds
By Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 06.25.2009

Arizona lawmakers don't have to provide more funds to teach English to students statewide, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today.

The justices accepted the arguments by attorneys for state School Superintendent Tom Horne that it was improper for a federal judge in Tucson to issue a statewide injunction without evidence that school districts throughout Arizona were violating the Equal Education Opportunity Act. That law requires states to ensure that all students have an opportunity to learn, an opportunity which specifically requires states to take "appropriate action'' to help students become proficient in English.

Justice Samuel Alito, writing the majority decision, said the only thing that is relevant is whether the Nogales Unified School District -- the district at issue when the lawsuit was filed in 1992 -- is now doing a better job of teaching English to its students.

The ruling most immediately absolves the state of funding an additional $40.6 million to schools. But it also opens the door to lawmakers actually being able to decrease some of the extra dollars they have given schools in the past to help students classified as "English language learners.''

In fact, Alito said that U.S. District Court Judge Raner Collins overstepped his authority in all of his mandates to the Legislature to provide more money, several of which were enacted under the threat of monetary penalties, orders that were repeatedly upheld by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.