The Preceding poster vs. John McCain
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 01:48:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community
  Forum Community Election Match-ups (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  The Preceding poster vs. John McCain		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Preceding poster vs. John McCain  (Read 2287 times)
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 28, 2009, 03:03:05 PM »
Presume they have equal funding/ballot recognition/media coverage.

...

Discuss
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2009, 06:55:11 PM »


McCain: 510
Donut: 28
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2009, 08:16:14 PM »


mccain blowout
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2009, 11:13:33 PM »
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2009, 12:10:33 AM »


John McCain (R) 290
Bacon King (I) 248
Logged
JSojourner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,510
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.94

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2009, 07:30:13 PM »


Don in green.  Assuming same or better funding, organization and press. 
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,054
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2009, 07:34:20 PM »
This one is easy. It would look just like the 2008 election map turned out to look, with JS being Obama, and Htmldon being McCain.
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2009, 04:04:39 PM »
Torie in Red, McCain in Blue
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2009, 04:12:50 PM »


McCain in Blue.
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2009, 04:18:43 PM »
« Edited: February 08, 2009, 04:26:01 PM by ICE HOCKEY »

Skip me for anyone posting.

You think I'd lose NJ and CT?Huh??  Hell, I'd even argue for PA (home state advantage, would slaughter McCain in the Southeast, have respectable Scranton/WB numbers given my background), MI, MN, and WI.

I'd even go as far as to say I'd best Obama in western PA, West Virginia, Ohio, the Appalachians and Upper South for I know... obvious reasons (see Jack Murtha).

The differences between me and Obama is he has a boatload more charisma and would turnout the black vote which I'd have trouble with.  Forget IN, VA, NC on that note.  I might come off a little too blue collar for NH and possibly OR voters. 
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 08, 2009, 04:22:44 PM »
Quote from: ICE HOCKEY on February 08, 2009, 04:18:43 PM

Skip me for anyone posting.

You think I'd lose NJ and CT?Huh??  Hell, I'd even argue for PA (home state advantage, would slaughter McCain in the Southeast, have respectable Scranton/WB numbers given my background), MI, MN, and WI.

I dind't see your economic views, you'll pull it off narrowly.


 
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 08, 2009, 04:30:20 PM »
Quote from: NiK on February 08, 2009, 04:22:44 PM
Quote from: ICE HOCKEY on February 08, 2009, 04:18:43 PM

Skip me for anyone posting.

You think I'd lose NJ and CT?Huh??  Hell, I'd even argue for PA (home state advantage, would slaughter McCain in the Southeast, have respectable Scranton/WB numbers given my background), MI, MN, and WI.

I dind't see your economic views, you'll pull it off narrowly.


 

I'd give McCain NH and possibly ME.  I'm more of a beer/shot drinker and cheesesteak eater than Whole Foods if you catch my drift.  I know I'm more open to trade than most of my family and other blue collar people I know are, but my personality type doesn't float with more uppity voters.  Weird I know. 
Logged
RosettaStoned
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,153
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.45, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 21, 2009, 11:47:37 PM »
Flyers Red
McCain Blue
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 28, 2009, 03:10:51 AM »

Skip.  No Nevada, Colorado, or Virginia?  I think I'd be more likely to win them 3 compared to Ohio.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 28, 2009, 11:00:55 PM »
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 01, 2009, 07:35:37 PM »
Populism usually is popular.  Here goes:
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 12 queries.