WSJ Says Obama Likely to Keep Defense Secretary Robert Gates
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:43:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  WSJ Says Obama Likely to Keep Defense Secretary Robert Gates
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WSJ Says Obama Likely to Keep Defense Secretary Robert Gates  (Read 1672 times)
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 11, 2008, 12:52:12 PM »

I've heard rumors of this for some time before Obama even won the election, so I suspect this will occur.  I like Gates, personally.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122636621096215941.html


WASHINGTON -- President-elect Barack Obama is leaning toward asking Defense Secretary Robert Gates to remain in his position for at least a year, according to two Obama advisers. A senior Pentagon official said Mr. Gates would likely accept the offer if it is made.


No final decision has been made, and Obama aides said other people are also under serious consideration for the defense post, one of the most highly coveted in any new cabinet. Several prominent Democrats, including former Clinton Navy Secretary Richard Danzig and former Clinton Deputy Secretary of Defense John Hamre, are also being considered. [No Hagel Bagel?]

The decision on retaining Mr. Gates will be the clearest indication to date of the incoming administration's thinking about Iraq and Afghanistan.

Like the president-elect, Mr. Gates supports deploying more troops to Afghanistan. But the defense secretary strongly opposes a firm timetable
for withdrawing American forces from Iraq, and his appointment could mean that Mr. Obama was effectively shelving his campaign promise to remove most troops from Iraq by mid-2010.

Several aides to Mr. Gates said that the defense chief often talks publicly about leaving the Pentagon in January and returning to his remote lakeside home in Washington state. They also noted that Mr. Gates carries around an electronic keychain whose display shows the number of days until the end of the Bush administration.

Still, speculation that Mr. Gates would remain in the job increased over the weekend when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) endorsed the idea in a CNN interview. "Why wouldn't we want to keep him?" Sen. Reid said. "He's never been a registered Republican."

Mr. Gates has always said his preference "is to retire once again," said Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell. "But he has also never shut the door on the possibility that he would be willing to serve for some period beyond the expiration of this term."

Mr. Gates took over the Pentagon in late 2006 after President George W. Bush ousted then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld over his management of the Iraq war. U.S. commanders in Iraq had been unable to prevent the country from slipping into civil war, and American and Iraqi casualties were soaring. Relations between Mr. Rumsfeld and many powerful lawmakers had grown toxic.

The new defense chief worked to repair the Pentagon's frayed ties with Capitol Hill. In his nomination hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Mr. Gates was asked if the U.S. was winning in Iraq. "No, sir," he replied.

The blunt reply won praise from many Democrats. Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan, then the committee's ranking Democrat and now its chairman, called it a "refreshing breath of reality."

Once in his position, Mr. Gates set about reshaping the U.S. war effort in Iraq, appointing Gen. David Petraeus to lead the military campaign and overseeing the deployment of 30,000 additional combat troops as part of a shift to a new counterinsurgency approach there.

Advocates of retaining Mr. Gates say it would provide for continuity at the Pentagon when the nation is mired in two wars and improve the new administration's ability to respond to any terror attack or international crisis that might occur during the months-long transition process.

The proponents also argue that it would show the new administration was serious about reaching out to pragmatic, experienced Republicans.

"He's not ideological, he's not partisan, and you could trust him to manage the wars in a competent manner while a new administration gets up to speed," said Nancy Soderberg, a Democrat and onetime U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. "It would allow the Obama administration to hit the ground running."

Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2008, 12:52:53 PM »

Good.  Gates has done a good job, and deserves to be kept.
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,012


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2008, 12:56:31 PM »

Yep, this was a no-brainer.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2008, 01:11:43 PM »

Gates has his head buried in the sand...so he should fit right in.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,490
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2008, 02:44:31 PM »

I have mixed feelings about this.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2008, 04:19:54 PM »


^^
Logged
ChrisFromNJ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,742


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -8.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2008, 04:21:16 PM »

Robert Gates must be making a lot of friends in the pundit class. That is the only explanation for the continued mentioning of his name in Obama's administration.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,944


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2008, 04:22:19 PM »

Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2008, 04:22:43 PM »

If y'all had been paying attention, this was an obvious choice pushed at least a month ago when Obama started to pull ahead.
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,012


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2008, 05:21:26 PM »

Robert Gates must be making a lot of friends in the pundit class. That is the only explanation for the continued mentioning of his name in Obama's administration.

I don't think it's that simple.   Gates has shown competence against incredible odds and I think the American people are fairly comfortable with him.  Plus I haven't seen any evidence of him being an idealogue or partisan.  There's really no reason to replace him.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2008, 08:46:51 PM »

Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,182
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 11, 2008, 10:09:31 PM »

Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 11, 2008, 11:12:06 PM »

Gates has his head buried in the sand...so he should fit right in.
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 13, 2008, 12:08:30 AM »

He'd be better than Senator Hagel that's for sure.
Logged
Mint
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,566
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 13, 2008, 12:10:14 AM »

Robert Gates must be making a lot of friends in the pundit class. That is the only explanation for the continued mentioning of his name in Obama's administration.

I don't think it's that simple.   Gates has shown competence against incredible odds and I think the American people are fairly comfortable with him.  Plus I haven't seen any evidence of him being an idealogue or partisan.  There's really no reason to replace him.
^^^

I'd be surprised if him or Petraeus were kicked out now, even if the latter has been repeatedly smeared by the hysterical liberals in the party.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,743


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 13, 2008, 02:32:42 AM »

*Vomits repeatedly*
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 13, 2008, 02:42:14 AM »

Have you ever heard/read him speak or are you just speaking out of instinct?

Gates isn't even a Republican.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 12 queries.