Obama likely to win NE02
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 10:31:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Obama likely to win NE02
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Obama likely to win NE02  (Read 4043 times)
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,218


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 06, 2008, 05:37:30 PM »

http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2835&u_sid=10480262
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2008, 05:57:14 PM »

Sad
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2008, 06:05:35 PM »

It would be funnier if this were breaking a 269-269 tie. Smiley
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2008, 06:39:06 PM »

Smiley
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,724
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2008, 07:23:59 PM »

The pattern of strong support for Obama in the metropolitan areas (even little ones like Omaha) is confirmed, yet again.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,939


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2008, 07:33:30 PM »

The pattern of strong support for Obama in the metropolitan areas (even little ones like Omaha) is confirmed, yet again.
He's our first Metropolitan president.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,075


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 06, 2008, 07:37:27 PM »

The pattern of strong support for Obama in the metropolitan areas (even little ones like Omaha) is confirmed, yet again.
He's our first Metropolitan president.

FDR? What exactly is that supposed to mean?
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,939


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 06, 2008, 07:43:27 PM »

The pattern of strong support for Obama in the metropolitan areas (even little ones like Omaha) is confirmed, yet again.
He's our first Metropolitan president.

FDR? What exactly is that supposed to mean?
He's culturally metropolitan. He's from the city. As far as I can tell, that's very much a first for American presidents, who have generally either come from small-town patrician families or who grew up in rural areas.
Logged
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 06, 2008, 07:47:01 PM »

If (big if) the c. 16k early/provisional votes break the same way the rest did (around 51-48 for Obama), that's no more than 500 votes net for Obama...so NE-02 is still very much a tossup.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,054
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 06, 2008, 07:48:04 PM »

The vote fraud juggernaut is apparently so massive, that even when it is no longer needed, it just keeps rolling along by virtue of sheer momentum.

On the other hand, maybe the shocks troops will now decamp to Minnesota. Stay tuned. Tongue
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 07, 2008, 07:15:26 AM »

If (big if) the c. 16k early/provisional votes break the same way the rest did (around 51-48 for Obama), that's no more than 500 votes net for Obama...so NE-02 is still very much a tossup.

The article said Obama won 61% of already counted early votes.
Logged
Rural Radical
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 399
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 07, 2008, 08:10:23 AM »

When was the last time one of the Nebraska Cds didnt go with the statewide winner?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,724
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 07, 2008, 08:11:38 AM »

When was the last time one of the Nebraska Cds didnt go with the statewide winner?

It's never happend since they introduced the CD system.
Logged
Rural Radical
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 399
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 07, 2008, 08:21:00 AM »

When was the last time one of the Nebraska Cds didnt go with the statewide winner?

It's never happend since they introduced the CD system.

I didnt think it had.

Im assuming the CD that Obama looks like winning is the most eastern one that contains Omaha?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,724
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 07, 2008, 08:22:22 AM »

Im assuming the CD that Obama looks like winning is the most eastern one that contains Omaha?

Actually, it's the far western ultra-agricultural one.

...

...

...

Grin
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 07, 2008, 08:31:46 AM »

I had a big debate with my housemate about whether this was more or less democratic than the whle-state method. I *think* we agreed that it was for smaller, less gerrymandered states like Nebraska (although that's questionable) and Maine, but that it would harm democracy in states like California, Texas, Georgia etc.
Logged
rbt48
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,060


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 07, 2008, 12:18:55 PM »

Heck, I live here.  I couldn't figure out why the GOP dominated legislature didn't change the law back to WTA, with friendly Gov Heineman ready to sign, I'm sure. 

Democrats made noise about pulling out a win in CD-2 back in 2000 and 2004.  They came up more than 20% short both times.  I think this system was first in effect for the 1996 election, but I'm unsure.  After the 2000 census, as Omaha grew, the amount of the CD encompassing Sarpy County (south of Omaha with Bellevue, Papillion, Offutt AFB, etc) became smaller.  Sarpy is very Republican:  McCain won it 57 to 41.  So with less of this county in CD 2, Omaha (and surrounding Douglas County) provide 85% of the votes. 

Provisional ballots, even in Republican Nebraska, trend Democratic, for reasons cited multiple times in this forum.  And Obama ran a highly visible campaign in Omaha:  many TV ads, perhaps four times more than McCain.  In my 15 years here, I had never seen a Presidential campaign ad on a local network before.  So, I'd bet the farm that McCain's slender lead in CD-2 vanishes and that, when all is said and done, Obama picks up a net of ~3000 votes and wins the CD by over 2000.

As a Republican, Nebraska is stupid to let this happen.  The new state legislature is looking to be 32R - 17D, so they should revoke the law and return to WTA.  Alternatively, when they redistrict in 2011, they can divide Omaha into 2 CDs and dilute the Democratic vote with overwhelmingly Republican outstate areas.

So, BL question: if the entire country used this system, what would the EV count have been for 2008?  Maybe someone can sit down and crank out the answer, though some states don't really make determining CD winners an easy task.
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 07, 2008, 12:47:49 PM »

So, BL question: if the entire country used this system, what would the EV count have been for 2008?  Maybe someone can sit down and crank out the answer, though some states don't really make determining CD winners an easy task.

I don't know offhand what the result would be, but I can tell you that the negative effects of going CD would be just as bad as if we went PV.  Democrats would concentrate on drumming up support in urban CDs and Republicans would concentrate on the countryside.  America would become more divided than it is now.  At least the WTA system forces Democrats to go to Akron and Republicans to go to Cleveland.

It would also be 10 times the zoo that our current system is on Election Day.  Right now we have 56 races (50 states, DC, ME CDs, NE CDs).  If we go by CD everywhere, we'll have 486 races.  If the election is at all close, we'll be waiting on 10 or 20 of those for days or possibly WEEKS before we know for sure who won the EC.  2000 will happen EVERY FOUR YEARS.
Logged
Nutmeg
thepolitic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,921
United States Minor Outlying Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 07, 2008, 01:46:13 PM »

I had a big debate with my housemate about whether this was more or less democratic than the whle-state method. I *think* we agreed that it was for smaller, less gerrymandered states like Nebraska (although that's questionable) and Maine, but that it would harm democracy in states like California, Texas, Georgia etc.

It would make for some interesting dynamics in certain states, making some more attractive for national campaigning (say, states that are currently safe for one party but with districts that could go either way) and some less so (say, states that are currently competitive statewide but rather polarized across their districts).  In states adopting such a system, there might even be some incentive by those drawing CDs to create some swing districts in order to attract national campaigns.

Georgia isn't gerrymandered anymore.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 07, 2008, 02:20:06 PM »

The pattern of strong support for Obama in the metropolitan areas (even little ones like Omaha) is confirmed, yet again.
Much smaller ones, too.
Logged
exopolitician
MATCHU[D]
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,892
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 07, 2008, 02:38:48 PM »

So....whats the deal?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 12 queries.