FINAL GALLUP ESTIMATE: Obama 55%, McCain 44%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 07:24:32 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  FINAL GALLUP ESTIMATE: Obama 55%, McCain 44%
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: FINAL GALLUP ESTIMATE: Obama 55%, McCain 44%  (Read 5753 times)
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,939


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 02, 2008, 10:41:04 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/111703/Final-Presidential-Estimate-Obama-55-McCain-44.aspx
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2008, 10:48:12 PM »

I would be shocked if this were reality.

But as a result, I skewed my prediction model heavily toward Obama.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2008, 10:49:33 PM »

If McCain won it'd be possibly the biggest polling disaster in history.
Logged
Firefly
Rookie
**
Posts: 248
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -7.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2008, 10:51:59 PM »

They're a little off.  It'll be Obama 54%, McCain 46%.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2008, 10:52:27 PM »

If McCain won it'd be possibly the biggest polling disaster in history.

or IBD/TIPP is glorified as the polling genius.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 02, 2008, 10:53:31 PM »

Why is Gallup releasing this early?
Logged
pepper11
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 767
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 02, 2008, 10:54:07 PM »

D 38 R 26.  This is the biggest joke in polling history.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 02, 2008, 10:55:43 PM »

Why is Gallup releasing this early?

Self-promotion, to lead the news cycle tomorrow.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 02, 2008, 10:57:28 PM »

I think they are off by more than a little.  None of the other tracking polls are showing anything that big.  This could be the worse Gallup since 1980.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 02, 2008, 10:59:52 PM »

If McCain won it'd be possibly the biggest polling disaster in history.

or IBD/TIPP is glorified as the polling genius.

We already know that they aren't through self-admission: "Anatomy of a Polling Disaster"
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 02, 2008, 11:02:38 PM »

When California, Illinois, New York and most of New England are at 60% for Obama, why not expect a larger PV spread than EV's will end up?
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 02, 2008, 11:03:47 PM »

Why is Gallup releasing this early?

Self-promotion, to lead the news cycle tomorrow.

Gallup's not Zogby.  They don't need to generate headlines to get their polls in the news.  Their polls would have lead the news cycle regardless.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 02, 2008, 11:04:56 PM »

Why is Gallup releasing this early?

Self-promotion, to lead the news cycle tomorrow.

Gallup's not Zogby.  They don't need to generate headlines to get their polls in the news.  Their polls would have lead the news cycle regardless.

I could have sworn they did this in 2004, too.  Either way, why's it matter?  Suspect something I'm missing?
Logged
Boris
boris78
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,098
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -4.52

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 02, 2008, 11:05:21 PM »

state polling consensus conforms to a much closer race than 55-44, obviously
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 02, 2008, 11:08:39 PM »

Why is Gallup releasing this early?

Self-promotion, to lead the news cycle tomorrow.

Gallup's not Zogby.  They don't need to generate headlines to get their polls in the news.  Their polls would have lead the news cycle regardless.

I could have sworn they did this in 2004, too.  Either way, why's it matter?  Suspect something I'm missing?

It doesn't really matter.  I'm just surprised to see a final Gallup poll at night instead of 1PM, and am a little surprised they're not polling at least part of tomorrow for a real final release tomorrow night.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 02, 2008, 11:13:58 PM »
« Edited: November 03, 2008, 12:46:23 AM by Stranger in a strange land »

When California, Illinois, New York and most of New England are at 60% for Obama, why not expect a larger PV spread than EV's will end up?

because turnout in California and New York as % of VAP is horrible, due mainly to illegal immigrants, legal immigrants who lack citizenship, and Latinos who can vote but don't.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,074


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 02, 2008, 11:16:38 PM »

I put more faith in Rasmussen. Gallup was pretty bad in 2004, so I'll wait to see how they do this year to judge whether they got their act together or not.
Logged
Sarnstrom
sarnstrom54014
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 679


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 02, 2008, 11:23:05 PM »

I put more faith in Rasmussen. Gallup was pretty bad in 2004, so I'll wait to see how they do this year to judge whether they got their act together or not.
Their final poll of 2004 had Bush up 49-47%.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,667
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 02, 2008, 11:40:41 PM »

Hmmm....an 11 point Bradley Effect? If that happens, you will see McCain and Palin assasination attempts every other week.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 03, 2008, 12:05:00 AM »

Hmmm....an 11 point Bradley Effect? If that happens, you will see McCain and Palin assasination attempts every other week.

Or an outlier.  Even Kos isn't showing that.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 03, 2008, 12:16:02 AM »

So, let me get this straight.

39% Democrat (91% for O)
31% Independent (48O-43M)
29% Republican (91% for M)
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 03, 2008, 12:28:46 AM »

Ok, here's a theory for teeth sinking.

CBS, ABC/WaPo, and Gallup all have margins around 11-13... everyone else is closer to 5

Guess which 3 polling firms include a proportional allocation of cell phone contacts?
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: November 03, 2008, 12:32:33 AM »

Ok, here's a theory for teeth sinking.

CBS, ABC/WaPo, and Gallup all have margins around 11-13... everyone else is closer to 5

Guess which 3 polling firms include a proportional allocation of cell phone contacts?

Pew also does the cell phone thing.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: November 03, 2008, 12:34:00 AM »

Ok, here's a theory for teeth sinking.

CBS, ABC/WaPo, and Gallup all have margins around 11-13... everyone else is closer to 5

Guess which 3 polling firms include a proportional allocation of cell phone contacts?

Pew also does the cell phone thing.

If we'e going to steal 538's ideas, we might as well post their graph Tongue

Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: November 03, 2008, 12:39:46 AM »

Also done before the last Gallup update, in which the Expanded and Traditional models both moved to Obama +11. It's an interesting difference, anyway; we'll see if Gallup and ABC/WaPo are vindicated. (CBS/NYT is too erratic to be vindicated by anything.)
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 13 queries.