NC: Research 2000 (for Daily Kos): Dole maintains healthy lead on Hagan

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

New Poll: North Carolina Senator by Research 2000 on 2008-07-30

Summary: D: 42%, R: 50%, U: 8%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

[Josh/Devilman88]

That isn't a healthy lean. GO HAGAN! Anyways, I really do think, this is a race that needs to keep an eye on. We are now seeing Dole's ad bounce going away.

[Small Business Owner of Any Repute]

That isn't a healthy lean. GO HAGAN! Anyways, I really do think, this is a race that needs to keep an eye on. We are now seeing Dole's ad bounce going away.

8 points isn't a healthy lean?

Somebody better phone Frank Lautenberg and tell him to start worrying!

[Josh/Devilman88]

Well, Lead is the word I was trying to type. And healthy lead to me is anything over 10%, But Dole most likely will win, because NC people are stupid and going to re-elect her when she hasn't even done one single thing for NC.

[DownWithTheLeft]

That isn't a healthy lean. GO HAGAN! Anyways, I really do think, this is a race that needs to keep an eye on. We are now seeing Dole's ad bounce going away.

8 points isn't a healthy lean?

Somebody better phone Frank Lautenberg and tell him to start worrying!

Not only eight points, but eight points in a poll commissioned by DailyKooks
Someone might want to awake Frank Lautenberg from the dead

[Josh/Devilman88]

Well a Republican Poster showed it at 9%, But like I said Dole will win, but it is a race we need to keep an eye on, because with it being close it could shock us.

[DownWithTheLeft]

Well a Republican Poster showed it at 9%, But like I said Dole will win, but it is a race we need to keep an eye on, because with it being close it could shock us.

Really?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[MarkWarner08]

Well a Republican Poster showed it at 9%, But like I said Dole will win, but it is a race we need to keep an eye on, because with it being close it could shock us.

Really?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

New rule: If you think the GOP will win a NJ U.S Senate seat, you can't criticize a partisan who thinks Democrats will win a NC U.S. Senate seat.

[DownWithTheLeft]

Well a Republican Poster showed it at 9%, But like I said Dole will win, but it is a race we need to keep an eye on, because with it being close it could shock us.

Really?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

New rule: If you think the GOP will win a NJ U.S Senate seat, you can't criticize a partisan who thinks Democrats will win a NC U.S. Senate seat.

I don't think that at all.  Plus, I admit all my predictions are incredibly biased.  And what I said about NJ is that Zimmer has the potential to come out of nowhere and pull a close race, similar to Bob Franks in 2000.  You are the one suggesting that Gordon Smith will lose

[Josh/Devilman88]

Well a Republican Poster showed it at 9%, But like I said Dole will win, but it is a race we need to keep an eye on, because with it being close it could shock us.

Really?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

New rule: If you think the GOP will win a NJ U.S Senate seat, you can't criticize a partisan who thinks Democrats will win a NC U.S. Senate seat.

I don't think that at all.  Plus, I admit all my predictions are incredibly biased.  And what I said about NJ is that Zimmer has the potential to come out of nowhere and pull a close race, similar to Bob Franks in 2000.  You are the one suggesting that Gordon Smith will lose

And I have said before, That most likely Dole will win, Hagan will run in 2010 and beat Burr, and she would be NC next new Senator, right?

[MarkWarner08]

Well a Republican Poster showed it at 9%, But like I said Dole will win, but it is a race we need to keep an eye on, because with it being close it could shock us.

Really?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

New rule: If you think the GOP will win a NJ U.S Senate seat, you can't criticize a partisan who thinks Democrats will win a NC U.S. Senate seat.

I don't think that at all.  Plus, I admit all my predictions are incredibly biased.  And what I said about NJ is that Zimmer has the potential to come out of nowhere and pull a close race, similar to Bob Franks in 2000.  You are the one suggesting that Gordon Smith will lose

Yes. I think Smith in in electoral danger. Guess who else agrees with me? Stu Rothenberg, Charlie Cook, CQ Politics, and Gordon Smith's campaign.

[DownWithTheLeft]

Well a Republican Poster showed it at 9%, But like I said Dole will win, but it is a race we need to keep an eye on, because with it being close it could shock us.

Really?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

New rule: If you think the GOP will win a NJ U.S Senate seat, you can't criticize a partisan who thinks Democrats will win a NC U.S. Senate seat.

I don't think that at all.  Plus, I admit all my predictions are incredibly biased.  And what I said about NJ is that Zimmer has the potential to come out of nowhere and pull a close race, similar to Bob Franks in 2000.  You are the one suggesting that Gordon Smith will lose

And I have said before, That most likely Dole will win, Hagan will run in 2010 and beat Burr, and she would be NC next new Senator, right?

Don't you realize the reason Kay Hagan is running instead of a legitimate candidate is because everyone is waiting to challenge Burr in 2010?  Guess that one went right over your head, sorry about that.

[Josh/Devilman88]

Well a Republican Poster showed it at 9%, But like I said Dole will win, but it is a race we need to keep an eye on, because with it being close it could shock us.

Really?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

New rule: If you think the GOP will win a NJ U.S Senate seat, you can't criticize a partisan who thinks Democrats will win a NC U.S. Senate seat.

I don't think that at all.  Plus, I admit all my predictions are incredibly biased.  And what I said about NJ is that Zimmer has the potential to come out of nowhere and pull a close race, similar to Bob Franks in 2000.  You are the one suggesting that Gordon Smith will lose

And I have said before, That most likely Dole will win, Hagan will run in 2010 and beat Burr, and she would be NC next new Senator, right?

Don't you realize the reason Kay Hagan is running instead of a legitimate candidate is because everyone is waiting to challenge Burr in 2010?  Guess that one went right over your head, sorry about that.

Who else is there in NC to run for Senate? Richard Moore? He was a joke? The only person that could beat Hagan in the primaries is Gov. Easley and he might run for Senate and win.

[DownWithTheLeft]

Who else is there in NC to run for Senate? Richard Moore? He was a joke? The only person that could beat Hagan in the primaries is Gov. Easley and he might run for Senate and win.

The better question is if there's anyway worse than Kay Hagan

[Josh/Devilman88]

Who else is there in NC to run for Senate? Richard Moore? He was a joke? The only person that could beat Hagan in the primaries is Gov. Easley and he might run for Senate and win.

The better question is if there's anyway worse than Kay Hagan

How is Hagan bad?

[DownWithTheLeft]

Who else is there in NC to run for Senate? Richard Moore? He was a joke? The only person that could beat Hagan in the primaries is Gov. Easley and he might run for Senate and win.

The better question is if there's anyway worse than Kay Hagan

How is Hagan bad?

Considering she down almost double digits and will most likely lose by that much in this atmosphere, obviously a lot.

[MarkWarner08]

Who else is there in NC to run for Senate? Richard Moore? He was a joke? The only person that could beat Hagan in the primaries is Gov. Easley and he might run for Senate and win.

The better question is if there's anyway worse than Kay Hagan

How is Hagan bad?

Considering she down almost double digits and will most likely lose by that much in this atmosphere, obviously a lot.

Can I put you on record saying that Hagan will lose by double-digits?

[Josh/Devilman88]

Who else is there in NC to run for Senate? Richard Moore? He was a joke? The only person that could beat Hagan in the primaries is Gov. Easley and he might run for Senate and win.

The better question is if there's anyway worse than Kay Hagan

How is Hagan bad?

Considering she down almost double digits and will most likely lose by that much in this atmosphere, obviously a lot.

Considering alot of people really don't know her at all, I think she is doing good. And Dole is a wife of Bob Dole, a guy who ran for President and won NC.

[HardRCafé]

But Dole most likely will win, because NC people are stupid

Thanks, then, for not being like other North Carolinians.

[Small Business Owner of Any Repute]

But Dole most likely will win, because NC people are stupid

Thanks, then, for not being like other North Carolinians.

Zing!

[Badlands17]

Who else is there in NC to run for Senate? Richard Moore? He was a joke? The only person that could beat Hagan in the primaries is Gov. Easley and he might run for Senate and win.

The better question is if there's anyway worse than Kay Hagan

How is Hagan bad?

Considering she down almost double digits and will most likely lose by that much in this atmosphere, obviously a lot.

I wouldn't say Hagan is bad; few NC Dems would be much better at nabbing the seat, but I would have to agree and say Dole will probably win by 55-60% at the very worst.

[Josh/Devilman88]

Who else is there in NC to run for Senate? Richard Moore? He was a joke? The only person that could beat Hagan in the primaries is Gov. Easley and he might run for Senate and win.

The better question is if there's anyway worse than Kay Hagan

How is Hagan bad?

Considering she down almost double digits and will most likely lose by that much in this atmosphere, obviously a lot.

I wouldn't say Hagan is bad; few NC Dems would be much better at nabbing the seat, but I would have to agree and say Dole will probably win by 55-60% at the very worst.

Dole will not get above 53%, To think any candidate for Senate in NC getting 55-60% is crazy and very wrong. NC is to heavily divided for that to happen.

[HardRCafé]

This reminds me of Harry's insistence Barbour couldn't break 55% or whatever.

[Josh/Devilman88]

This reminds me of Harry's insistence Barbour couldn't break 55% or whatever.

Well in the past 18 years no cadidate has got above 53%.

[HardRCafé]

Well in the past 18 years no cadidate has been named Kay either.

Guess what that proves.