Which drugs do you think should be legal for personal use?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 05:14:06 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Which drugs do you think should be legal for personal use?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11]
Poll
Question: Which drugs do you think should be legal for personal use?
#1
Alcohol
 
#2
Tobacco
 
#3
Marijuana
 
#4
Heroin
 
#5
Meth
 
#6
Cocaine
 
#7
Crack-Cocaine
 
#8
Barbiturates
 
#9
LSD
 
#10
Magic Mushrooms
 
#11
Ecstasy
 
#12
Amphetamines
 
#13
Salvia Divornium
 
#14
Mescaline
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 102

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Which drugs do you think should be legal for personal use?  (Read 36022 times)
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #250 on: December 03, 2009, 04:40:13 AM »

All of these. Angel dust is pretty much the only drug I would have reservations about legalising.

Pretty much although obviously meth labs and things of that nature should be illegal.

Yes. Drug dealing without a licence would also remain illegal.
Logged
Scam of God
Einzige
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #251 on: December 03, 2009, 11:38:21 AM »

All.
Logged
Sewer
SpaceCommunistMutant
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,236
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #252 on: December 03, 2009, 11:42:39 AM »

All but meth.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,175
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #253 on: December 03, 2009, 11:54:24 AM »

     All of them.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #254 on: December 03, 2009, 11:59:15 AM »

All of these. Angel dust is pretty much the only drug I would have reservations about legalising.

Pretty much although obviously meth labs and things of that nature should be illegal.

Yes. Drug dealing without a licence would also remain illegal.

Some anarcho-capitalist you are.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #255 on: December 03, 2009, 12:02:01 PM »

All of these. Angel dust is pretty much the only drug I would have reservations about legalising.

Pretty much although obviously meth labs and things of that nature should be illegal.

Yes. Drug dealing without a licence would also remain illegal.
So now you support government-granted monopolies?
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #256 on: December 03, 2009, 12:12:57 PM »

All of them. In private, everyone should have the right to do what they want to their bodies.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #257 on: December 03, 2009, 02:23:49 PM »

All of these. Angel dust is pretty much the only drug I would have reservations about legalising.

Pretty much although obviously meth labs and things of that nature should be illegal.

Yes. Drug dealing without a licence would also remain illegal.
So now you support government-granted monopolies?

No, I simply don't support unpurified crap being sold. I am fine with shops selling it, and I am strongly against the government having a monopoly on it.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #258 on: December 03, 2009, 05:45:20 PM »

All of these. Angel dust is pretty much the only drug I would have reservations about legalising.

Pretty much although obviously meth labs and things of that nature should be illegal.

Yes. Drug dealing without a licence would also remain illegal.
So now you support government-granted monopolies?

No, I simply don't support unpurified crap being sold. I am fine with shops selling it, and I am strongly against the government having a monopoly on it.
So then what is this licence you speak of?
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,581
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #259 on: December 03, 2009, 10:22:50 PM »

All of the above.  Any attempt to ban any one of them will only encourage a black-market instead -and all that that entails...  

Better for the government to treat addicts using the taxes & fees levied on legalized and regulated drug transactions.  
Logged
Mint
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,566
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #260 on: December 03, 2009, 10:59:00 PM »

That's a surprising display of sanity coming from you. Tongue
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #261 on: December 03, 2009, 11:35:20 PM »

Better for the government to treat addicts using the taxes & fees levied on legalized and regulated drug transactions.  
Strange, I thought that drug addiction should be treated by medical professionals. I wasn't aware of any studies that found that politicians administering "taxes and fees" is now the most effective treatment.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,581
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #262 on: December 04, 2009, 06:33:47 PM »

Better for the government to fund the treatment of addicts using the taxes & fees levied on legalized and regulated drug transactions.  
Strange, I thought that drug addiction should be treated by medical professionals. I wasn't aware of any studies that found that politicians administering "taxes and fees" is now the most effective treatment.
--------------

Better? 
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #263 on: December 04, 2009, 06:43:54 PM »

Better for the government to fund the treatment of addicts using the taxes & fees levied on legalized and regulated drug transactions.  
Strange, I thought that drug addiction should be treated by medical professionals. I wasn't aware of any studies that found that politicians administering "taxes and fees" is now the most effective treatment.
--------------

Better? 
So why is it the state's responsibility to rob everyone to pay for the bad choices of a few? Why isn't it the responsibility of, you know, the people who actually made the decision to abuse drugs?
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #264 on: December 04, 2009, 06:44:48 PM »

Better for the government to fund the treatment of addicts using the taxes & fees levied on legalized and regulated drug transactions.  
Strange, I thought that drug addiction should be treated by medical professionals. I wasn't aware of any studies that found that politicians administering "taxes and fees" is now the most effective treatment.
--------------

Better? 
So why is it the state's responsibility to rob everyone to pay for the bad choices of a few? Why isn't it the responsibility of, you know, the people who actually made the decision to abuse drugs?

Society made them do it. lol
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #265 on: December 04, 2009, 11:50:45 PM »

Better for the government to fund the treatment of addicts using the taxes & fees levied on legalized and regulated drug transactions.  
Strange, I thought that drug addiction should be treated by medical professionals. I wasn't aware of any studies that found that politicians administering "taxes and fees" is now the most effective treatment.
--------------

Better? 
So why is it the state's responsibility to rob everyone to pay for the bad choices of a few? Why isn't it the responsibility of, you know, the people who actually made the decision to abuse drugs?



Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

These taxes apply only to actual drug sales.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #266 on: December 04, 2009, 11:56:42 PM »

Better for the government to fund the treatment of addicts using the taxes & fees levied on legalized and regulated drug transactions.  
Strange, I thought that drug addiction should be treated by medical professionals. I wasn't aware of any studies that found that politicians administering "taxes and fees" is now the most effective treatment.
--------------

Better? 
So why is it the state's responsibility to rob everyone to pay for the bad choices of a few? Why isn't it the responsibility of, you know, the people who actually made the decision to abuse drugs?



Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
And? How does that address my question?

These taxes apply only to actual drug sales.
Logged
Continential
The Op
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,564
Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -5.30

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #267 on: December 06, 2021, 01:20:19 AM »

all of them
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 13 queries.