electoral-vote maps coming into 2004
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 04:00:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  electoral-vote maps coming into 2004
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: electoral-vote maps coming into 2004  (Read 3461 times)
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,667
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 17, 2008, 04:18:45 PM »

May 31, 2004


June 30, 2004


July 31, 2004



August 31, 2004


September 30, 2004


October 31, 2004


Election Eve


Election Result



This Year-


June 18, 2008


June 18, 2004
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2008, 11:56:28 PM »

In your "June 18th, 2008" map, Michigan should be Republican - RCP shows McCain with a 1.6 lead now.  They also show McCain tied with Obama in Virginia, so you may consider switching it to gray.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,667
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2008, 09:46:00 AM »

This is electoral-vote, not RCP.
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2008, 10:00:56 AM »

Are you basing the states off of the latest Rasmussen polls, because most polls show McCain ahead in Michigan.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2008, 10:43:04 AM »

Are you basing the states off of the latest Rasmussen polls, because most polls show McCain ahead in Michigan.

Electoral-vote uses the most recent polls and extrapolates a trend. In other words, if an older poll shows McCain leading while a newer poll shows Obama leading (as is the case in Michigan), Obama is assumed to be leading and gaining ground. It's pretty rudimentary, but they did reasonably well in 2004.
Logged
kevinatcausa
Rookie
**
Posts: 196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 18, 2008, 03:20:56 PM »

I don't think they even use a trend.  Their algorithm looks to me like:

Average all polls within a week of the most recent poll in each state, treating each poll equally.  If Obama's ahead, award the state 100% to Obama.  If McCain's ahead, award the state 100% to McCain. 

It tends to make for dramatic swings in the electoral vote totals.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2008, 08:09:31 AM »

why did we start to loose ground in Florida towards the end of 2004? we carried it by five points.
Because of hurricanes, lack of a track record of high-turnout elections (Florida elections tended to have ridiculously low turnout. The increase in votes cast in Florida 2000-4 is extreme. And if you want to sob and cry about something, check out how few House elections in the state very seriously contested in the 80s and 90s), complex demographics etc, the state basically just wasn't easy to poll.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 21, 2008, 09:59:26 AM »

There method actually seems to be this:

Use the latest poll result
Logged
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 27, 2008, 05:49:21 PM »

If I recall correctly, www.electoral-vote.com actually had Oklahoma going blue up until probably May or June.  We all know how that turned out.
Logged
Aizen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,510


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -9.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 27, 2008, 07:00:43 PM »

If I recall correctly, www.electoral-vote.com actually had Oklahoma going blue up until probably May or June.  We all know how that turned out.


I'm pretty sure you recall incorrectly. There's not a single poll on the atlas database that shows Oklahoma going blue and going back through the electoral-vote archives fails to show Oklahoma "going blue".
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,667
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 28, 2008, 04:28:07 PM »
« Edited: June 28, 2008, 04:36:31 PM by Hantytown »

However, the trend map had Oklahoma going Blue, but the trend map was very inaccurate throughout the election. I think the general maps are more reliable. I mean, the election was going back and forth throughout the May and Juny time and Kerry built a modest lead in the late summer. In September in Early October, Bush maintained a lead by calling Kerry a liar and a poser and got a good post-convention bounce. By late October, Kerry had won the debates and the election was very close. However, Bush won comfortably with his GOTV method which gave him 1.5 million voters and made 500,000 voters change their minds at the last minute.

Today's Map- June 28, 2008-


Rassmussen Report's poll towards McCain nuetralized Obama's lead in Florida; Missouri and Indiana switch.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,667
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 03, 2008, 04:33:26 PM »

August 3, 2008



August 3, 2004

Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.184 seconds with 14 queries.