Governor's Divorce Worries Nevada Republicans
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 02:52:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Governor's Divorce Worries Nevada Republicans
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Governor's Divorce Worries Nevada Republicans  (Read 2219 times)
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 11, 2008, 04:45:11 AM »

"Although Nevadans yawn at quickie divorces, drive-through weddings, topless showgirls and legalized prostitution, the divorce proceedings between Gov. Jim Gibbons (R) and his estranged wife, Dawn, have transfixed folks here like a daytime soap opera," the Los Angeles Times reports.

"The governor won't face voters until 2010 -- a political eternity -- but GOP activists fret that his purported philandering could hurt the party in November. What if fed-up Republicans pare back campaign contributions -- or stay home on election day? That could flip control of the state Senate, where Republicans cling to a slender majority -- or even hand Nevada, which twice voted for President Bush, to Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama."

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2008/06/10/governors_divorce_worries_nevada_republicans.html

Does anyone else think Gibbons is for the chop in 2010?  I would have thought that Dina Titus would have defeated him in a rematch of 2006, but now she's running for NV-3 then it will probably not be her.  So who, Oscar Goodman?
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,998


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2008, 08:31:17 AM »


"The governor won't face voters until 2010 -- a political eternity -- but GOP activists fret that his purported philandering could hurt the party in November. What if fed-up Republicans pare back campaign contributions -- or stay home on election day? That could flip control of the state Senate, where Republicans cling to a slender majority -- or even hand Nevada, which twice voted for President Bush, to Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama."

Does anyone think Republicans would skip a presidential election because their governor is an embarrassment? I'm skeptical.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2008, 09:01:26 AM »


"The governor won't face voters until 2010 -- a political eternity -- but GOP activists fret that his purported philandering could hurt the party in November. What if fed-up Republicans pare back campaign contributions -- or stay home on election day? That could flip control of the state Senate, where Republicans cling to a slender majority -- or even hand Nevada, which twice voted for President Bush, to Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama."

Does anyone think Republicans would skip a presidential election because their governor is an embarrassment? I'm skeptical.
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2008, 09:13:47 AM »

Does anyone think Republicans would renominate a guy with approvals like Bob Taft and Frank Murkowski before he was even sworn in?
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2008, 10:34:21 AM »

Does anyone think Republicans would renominate a guy with approvals like Bob Taft and Frank Murkowski before he was even sworn in?

Ernie Fletcher?
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2008, 11:07:47 AM »

His approvals were still double those of Taft and Murkowski.  Nevertheless, touché.
Logged
Kevin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,424
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2008, 05:54:36 PM »

I'm hoping he will be primaried in 2010
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 12, 2008, 09:33:13 PM »

This guy is the same asshole who said that "Liberals should be used as human shields" while he was in Congress. I wish only the worst things for this jackass.
Logged
MarkWarner08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,812


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2008, 02:20:24 PM »

If the adulterer Governor runs for reelection, he'll likely lose. If Democrats don't take back in the State Senate in 2008, they likely will in 2010, especially if Gibbons runs again.  This creates a nightmare situation for the GOP, because the Democrats  would control the Governorship, the State Senate, and the State House. With those majorities, they'll be able to push through a redistricting plan that could yield three Democratic House seats.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 11 queries.