Because all imperialism does is make the people we are trying to "liberate" hate us even more and also our ideals. The more wars we have in the middle east the lesser chance there is of democracy flourishing in the middle east. I mean just look at India as an example. We equated Capitalism with Colonialism and look how long it took us to get over that. If we want to spread our ideals in the world, it wont be with a stick.
k...but that doesn't mean we have to "kowtow" to them either.
Oh of course not man but we dont have to unilaterally invade countries either. Terrorism is a policing problem. A world policing problem so we need more multilateralism not less.
Sure, this doesn't mean we have to "kowtow" to Fundie Muslim nations though.
I dont think America has ever "kowtowed" to any fundie muslim nation. If you are equating negotiation with "kowtowing", well I sincerely believe you are wrong. We are the most strongest nation in the world, we should be the least afraid to negotiate. Sometimes invasions are necessary, as in the case of Afghanistan because you just cannot negotiate with the Taliban. Most of the time talking to our enemies work and of course we have the army for backup.
I think you got lost somewhere. All I was saying was that we don't have to EITHER play Empire or Kowtow to Muslim Fundies. I'm saying there are other options than just those two.
Oh haha yeah i totally agree with you.