MN: Rasmussen: Clinton with a small lead

[Josh/Devilman88]

New Poll: Minnesota President by Rasmussen on 2008-04-22

Summary: D: 47%, R: 42%, U: 4%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

[Erc]

For reference, the real numbers here (Obama v. Mcain):

Obama 52
McCain 38

(And, even more interestingly, Coleman is up 7 over Franken).

[Josh/Devilman88]

For reference, the real numbers here (Obama v. Mcain):

Obama 52
McCain 38

(And, even more interestingly, Coleman is up 7 over Franken).

I added the poll to the Obama vs McCain, but it seems like it don't make a link.

[Wiz in Wis]

Is that why MN is not appearing as Leans Obama on the poll map, because it should be.

[Tender Branson]

For reference, the real numbers here (Obama v. Mcain):

Obama 52
McCain 38

(And, even more interestingly, Coleman is up 7 over Franken).

I added the poll to the Obama vs McCain, but it seems like it don't make a link.

If you create the Clinton vs. McCain poll, just enter the Obama vs. McCain numbers in the space below the line where you write in the title of the post ...

As for the poll, it seems a bit off in favor of Obama. I think he's ahead by 4-8%.

[DownWithTheLeft]

If we assume the McCain/Obama margin is something more like 5% rather than 12%, Coleman has a double digit lead

[Alcon]

If we assume the McCain/Obama margin is something more like 5% rather than 12%, Coleman has a double digit lead

Things don't exactly work that way in the real world.

[minionofmidas]

If we assume the McCain/Obama margin is something more like 5% rather than 12%, Coleman has a double digit lead

And if we assume - with marginally more though still not very much reason - that Coleman vs Franken is a statistical tie, Obama's lead is somewhere between 16 and 22 points, so what's your point exactly?

[Eraserhead]

Interestingly, Obama jumped ahead of McCain in today's national numbers from Ras. This has to be the first he's been ahead in those in months.

[Person Man]

No. He was ahead around the beginning of the month.

[Padfoot]

For reference, the real numbers here (Obama v. Mcain):

Obama 52
McCain 38

(And, even more interestingly, Coleman is up 7 over Franken).

I added the poll to the Obama vs McCain, but it seems like it don't make a link.

I don't think it was added correctly.  The map and the 3-poll average are wrong.

[Ban my account ffs!]

If we assume the McCain/Obama margin is something more like 5% rather than 12%, Coleman has a double digit lead

And if we assume - with marginally more though still not very much reason - that Coleman vs Franken is a statistical tie, Obama's lead is somewhere between 16 and 22 points, so what's your point exactly?

His point is that his bwain has a wittow gwowing up to do.  Logic follows fantastical ideological orgasms.

[??????????]

Is Josh22 changing his loyalty again?