CIA: Brazil stockpiling WMD, funding terrorism
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 06:53:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  CIA: Brazil stockpiling WMD, funding terrorism
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CIA: Brazil stockpiling WMD, funding terrorism  (Read 1326 times)
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,218


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 14, 2008, 08:58:13 PM »

At least that's what FOX will be telling us in, oh, a few weeks from now:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7086264.stm
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2008, 10:34:31 PM »

Huh?
Logged
JohnFKennedy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,448


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 15, 2008, 05:06:47 AM »

I think his point is that they now have a large oil reserve so the US will be needing a reason to invade and take control of said reserve.

Basically it is a joke/comment on the Iraq war just being about oil I think. Unfortunately for me - as a history student - that argument doesn't hold up. Now I may be pretty left-wing, but that hasn't blinded me to a few facts which don't sit well with that point. Even during the 1990s when the USA had imposed an embargo on Iraqi oil, it was still the world's largest consumer of it (if you want I can find the reference for this point later). Now fast forward to after the invasion of Iraq when the Iraqi oil fields were sitting unused and insurgency makes it pretty hard to get the oil out of there. Either that demonstrates a stunning lack of foresight on the part of every member of the administration - a point which I suppose you could level but wouldn't be entirely fair - or it suggests that it wasn't just about oil. For me it is the latter. I am not sure what the overall reasoning behind the war was, but I don't think the facts hold up a wholly oil-based interpretation.
Logged
GMantis
Dessie Potter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,998
Bulgaria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 15, 2008, 07:42:43 AM »

I think his point is that they now have a large oil reserve so the US will be needing a reason to invade and take control of said reserve.

Basically it is a joke/comment on the Iraq war just being about oil I think. Unfortunately for me - as a history student - that argument doesn't hold up. Now I may be pretty left-wing, but that hasn't blinded me to a few facts which don't sit well with that point. Even during the 1990s when the USA had imposed an embargo on Iraqi oil, it was still the world's largest consumer of it (if you want I can find the reference for this point later). Now fast forward to after the invasion of Iraq when the Iraqi oil fields were sitting unused and insurgency makes it pretty hard to get the oil out of there. Either that demonstrates a stunning lack of foresight on the part of every member of the administration - a point which I suppose you could level but wouldn't be entirely fair - or it suggests that it wasn't just about oil. For me it is the latter. I am not sure what the overall reasoning behind the war was, but I don't think the facts hold up a wholly oil-based interpretation.
Many events indicate that the US is going to stay in Iraq for a long time. Obviously the oil is underused at the moment, but this may change in the future. And with oil production set to decline in the next years, it's imperative to seize major oil supplies as soon as possible. I confess that I'm worried about Brazil...
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 15, 2008, 08:08:00 AM »

Well, I doubt there are any plans for immediate invasion. AFAIK Brazil isn't vocally anti-US, so them having oil might be good for us. They aren't an OPEC member, and if they stay that way it could give OPEC some much needed competition which might drive prices down a bit.
Logged
AkSaber
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,315
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 17, 2008, 05:21:00 PM »

I don't think Brazil selling us oil would be a problem. The relations between the countries are ok. And I don't think Brazil would turn away such a big business opportunity. Tongue

But, what I think about the Iraq War is quite different. I really do believe it was motivated by oil. The war has destabilized the region, and all our idiotic mistakes have made the country worse. Since shortly before the war started, the price of oil has quadrupled. So the oil firms here are making four times their normal profits.

Plus, the greatest threat to the security our biggest oil suppliers, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, was Saddam Hussein. He's gone, and their security interests served.

One forum member described the Iraq War as, "A war our government refuses to let us win." Honestly, I can't think of a better description for this war. Could our leaders really be this stupid at handling wars, or do they have ulterior motives? I can't help but wonder, when oil prices start to go down, will that be when we invade Iran?

Yes yes, I'm batso. Tongue
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 11 queries.