Health Care Reform
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 01:13:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Health Care Reform
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Which of the plans below would you rather have as a model for universal health care?
#1
Obama's Plan for a Healthy America
 
#2
Healthy Americans Act
 
#3
American Health Choices Plan
 
#4
Single-Payer National Health Insurance
 
#5
Other (please elaborate)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 32

Author Topic: Health Care Reform  (Read 7139 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,577
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 06, 2008, 05:12:43 PM »
« edited: April 09, 2008, 09:31:05 PM by Frodo »

And here are the links to the various plans:

Barack Obama's Plan for a Healthy America.

Ron Wyden's Healthy Americans Act.

Hillary Clinton's American Health Choices Plan.

Physicians for a National Health Program's Single-Payer National Health Insurance Plan.





Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 06, 2008, 09:28:19 PM »

Single-payer, then Obama's or Wyden's, and not Clinton's sop to insurance companies.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,653
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 06, 2008, 10:25:44 PM »

I don't know much about the plans, or the healthcare system or what to change and I don't have time to look at everything right now. I would however like the government to be able to bargain down the price of perscription drugs and for us to be able to important perscription drugs from other countries.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 07, 2008, 01:52:43 AM »

Single payer.
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,643
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2008, 07:59:36 PM »

Single Payer by far.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2008, 08:01:58 PM »

Single payer
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,424
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 10, 2008, 09:55:10 AM »

single payer (morally right)
Logged
Nutmeg
thepolitic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,919
United States Minor Outlying Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2008, 03:57:41 PM »
« Edited: April 17, 2008, 10:59:37 PM by Nutmeg »

Single-payer, but not single-provider.

On that issue, PNHP's Robert LeBow has written possibly the best book - Health Care Meltdown - offering a solution to the current problems.
Logged
NDN
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,495
Uganda


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 25, 2008, 12:48:53 AM »

Other: Compulsory Insurance just like in Switzerland, Germany, etc. Not thrilled with that but it beats socialized medicine (single payer) or the joke of a system we have now.

Other: Romney's Plan - mandate that each state develop their own system to insure every citizen, encouraging the adoption of Massachusetts' successful system.

That would be doable but it sounds awfully complicated. Although it's not like the Democrats 'plans' are any better.
Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 25, 2008, 04:52:03 AM »

A hybrid of the Wyden plan and the Romney plan would be ideal.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 20, 2008, 09:41:08 AM »

Single-payer is by far the best plan, but not politically feasible in the United States at this time.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 20, 2008, 05:44:29 PM »

There is really nothing I fear than socialized medicine (AKA demotivation of doctors and destruction of health care).

I have, and probably always will support, Tancredo's plan for AHPs.  Under this plan, small business owners and others without insurance can buy insurance in packs to bring down costs.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,424
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 20, 2008, 08:39:12 PM »

There is really nothing I fear than socialized medicine (AKA demotivation of doctors and destruction of health care).
Oh, so that's why Canada and Western Europe have better health care systems than us (by WHO rankings).
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2008, 12:21:16 PM »

Other: Romney's Plan - mandate that each state develop their own system to insure every citizen, encouraging the adoption of Massachusetts' successful system.

I strongly challenge the notion that Massachusetts' system is "successful."
Logged
jesmo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 571


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2008, 02:14:11 PM »

Single-payer is by far the best plan, but not politically feasible in the United States at this time.

I do not care weather it is politically feasible or not, it is important that we have it, even if it means election fraud.
Logged
Daniel Adams
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,424
Georgia


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 21, 2008, 06:16:27 PM »

Other: Romney's Plan - mandate that each state develop their own system to insure every citizen, encouraging the adoption of Massachusetts' successful system.
Funny, I just finished reading an opinion article from the Wall Street Journal that says the exact opposite. In fact, it's Obama and Clinton are basing their own socialistic plans on RomneyCare.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 21, 2008, 09:14:14 PM »

I favor none of them. Building onto of anything we have now, even on top of the ashes, would be a massive failure.

Dismantle the private system we have now. Offer free preventative care (visits, medicine, tests, etc.). Offer government subsidized insurance that covers catastrophic care. Private insurance would be allowed as would private health clinics for those who want to pay extra.

The reason "insurance" is so expensive is that it is insuring against stuff that's almost certain to happen (routine illness, the need for tests, daily medication) instead of actually insuring against car accidents, cancer, organ transplants, etc.

Car insurance doesn't cover oil changes, inspections, and routine mateneince, why should health insurance?
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 21, 2008, 11:35:58 PM »

I strongly challenge the notion that Massachusetts' system is "successful."

On the bright side, if it actually were successful, he would be the Republican Presidential nominee after all.  So there is reason to be glad it is not.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,309


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 22, 2008, 12:08:55 AM »

I favor none of them. Building onto of anything we have now, even on top of the ashes, would be a massive failure.

Dismantle the private system we have now. Offer free preventative care (visits, medicine, tests, etc.). Offer government subsidized insurance that covers catastrophic care. Private insurance would be allowed as would private health clinics for those who want to pay extra.

The reason "insurance" is so expensive is that it is insuring against stuff that's almost certain to happen (routine illness, the need for tests, daily medication) instead of actually insuring against car accidents, cancer, organ transplants, etc.

Car insurance doesn't cover oil changes, inspections, and routine mateneince, why should health insurance?

Well said, good universal preventative health care in itself should save the system a countless amount of money. There would be lower emergency care costs and higher productivity.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 23, 2008, 09:43:08 AM »

There is really nothing I fear than socialized medicine (AKA demotivation of doctors and destruction of health care).
Oh, so that's why Canada and Western Europe have better health care systems than us (by WHO rankings).
Which do you put more weight in?  World rankings or where people want to go for there operations?  When was the last time you heard of Americans flying to other countries to get operations?  People come here because we have the best and brightest.  The reason our ranking is not highest is b/c we also have terrible doctors, but the capitalist health care system allows us to have both instead a lot of mediocre doctors or unmotivated doctors without top notch medical advances
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 23, 2008, 11:50:38 AM »

Which do you put more weight in?  World rankings or where people want to go for there operations?  When was the last time you heard of Americans flying to other countries to get operations?  People come here because we have the best and brightest.  The reason our ranking is not highest is b/c we also have terrible doctors, but the capitalist health care system allows us to have both instead a lot of mediocre doctors or unmotivated doctors without top notch medical advances

Why on earth would ordinary people who cannot afford access to health care be interested in where the rich fly for their luxury operations?
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: May 23, 2008, 11:59:27 AM »

Single-payer is by far the best plan, but not politically feasible in the United States at this time.

I do not care weather it is politically feasible or not, it is important that we have it, even if it means election fraud.

Ah, you see, there is a thing we have called democracy, you know, where things are done that represent the will of the people. Ever heard of it?

I support universal health care, but it should not be implemented without popular support.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: May 23, 2008, 12:01:08 PM »

There is really nothing I fear than socialized medicine (AKA demotivation of doctors and destruction of health care).
Oh, so that's why Canada and Western Europe have better health care systems than us (by WHO rankings).
Which do you put more weight in?  World rankings or where people want to go for there operations?  When was the last time you heard of Americans flying to other countries to get operations?  People come here because we have the best and brightest.  The reason our ranking is not highest is b/c we also have terrible doctors, but the capitalist health care system allows us to have both instead a lot of mediocre doctors or unmotivated doctors without top notch medical advances

And what purpose does that serve if only few people have access to this wonderful health care?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: May 23, 2008, 01:52:40 PM »

When was the last time you heard of Americans flying to other countries to get operations?

It happens all the time for non-emergency surgical procedures.  It can be a lot cheaper to fly overseas to destinations such as Thailand and get procedures done at hospitals with international accreditation.  There are even some health care plans in the United States that provide incentives to clients to use such alternatives.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: May 23, 2008, 07:16:49 PM »

When was the last time you heard of Americans flying to other countries to get operations?

On the bus from the Bangkok airport to my hotel I was talking with a guy who had just flown direct from LAX for dental surgery and was flying home the next day.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 12 queries.