MacArthur and Emperor Hirohito
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 07, 2024, 07:27:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  MacArthur and Emperor Hirohito
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Did Gen. Douglas MacArthur make the correct decision in absolving the emperor, and the entire imperial family of involvement in war crimes perpetrated by the Japanese military in the Second World War?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 14

Author Topic: MacArthur and Emperor Hirohito  (Read 4442 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,602
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 08, 2008, 07:59:37 PM »

What do you think?
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,809


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2008, 08:17:57 PM »

Yes, even though the Emperor was guilty.  You don't go around executing other people's gods (even if you do make them renounce their divinity.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2008, 08:38:01 PM »

No, they should have been tried for what they did, like the Nazis at Nuremberg.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,778
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 08, 2008, 09:21:35 PM »

Hirohitler. Not Hirohito. Spell it rite!!111
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 08, 2008, 09:22:22 PM »

Those around knew how important the Imperial family were for Japanese people, the allies wanted to re-build Japan - without them it would have been a much more difficult task. While I don't agree with them being absolved of responsibility, I understand the practicalities behind it.

Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 08, 2008, 09:32:56 PM »

He should have been forced to abdicate and replaced by Akihito (who was only 12 at the time).
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,182
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 09, 2008, 01:36:09 AM »

all in all, yes. Even though horrible atrocities were committed  in his name, the emperor was not responsible for them. Killing the emperor would have made post-war reconciliation difficult if not impossible.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 09, 2008, 03:27:30 AM »

I think he was necessary to preventing a bloodbath.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,430
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 09, 2008, 07:06:14 AM »

I'm with the consensus.  He probably should have faced some more punishment than he got, but by doing so we would have made it much more difficult to get to where we are today with our relationship with Japan.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 09, 2008, 12:49:54 PM »

He should have been forced to abdicate and replaced by Akihito (who was only 12 at the time).

That would make sense, though I'm not sure abdication would be aceptable in the Japanese culture of the time.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 09, 2008, 03:16:27 PM »

He should have been forced to abdicate and replaced by Akihito (who was only 12 at the time).

That would make sense, though I'm not sure abdication would be acceptable in the Japanese culture of the time.

Abdication was once quite common for the Emperors, even abdication if favor of an underaged emperor, though the last time an emperor abdicated was in 1817 when the 45-year old Tomohito, Hirohito's great-great-great-grandfather abdicated in favor of his 17-year old son, Ayahito.  So abdication would have been a possibility, indeed, there were those within the Imperial Family who were angling for an abdication, but they were also thinking in terms of being named regent for Akihito.
Logged
Flying Dog
Jtfdem
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,404
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 24, 2008, 10:38:48 PM »

Since he was basically powerless and had no back-bone then no. His crimes were not worth the bloodshed that would have happened if he had been tried.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 13 queries.