Left Bloc HQ (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 06:57:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Election and History Games
  Mock Parliament (Moderators: Hash, Dereich)
  Left Bloc HQ (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Left Bloc HQ  (Read 30317 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« on: February 20, 2008, 06:05:26 PM »

Given the current sizes of the parties, having a Social Democrat be the Shadow Prime Minister makes the most sense unless no Social Democrat is willing.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2008, 06:01:26 PM »

My own preference is Shadow Minister of Finance, given the importance my party puts on banking and finance issues, but I would be willing to accept Shadow Deputy Prime Minister in conjunction with a specific Shadow Ministry.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2008, 02:21:32 PM »

While Deputy Prime Minister is nice, by itself it's meaningless.  An actual ministry would definitely be appreciated, with or without the DPM position.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2008, 04:49:13 PM »

It would do, although unless we get in a Cod War or the like, it might not amount to much.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #4 on: February 23, 2008, 09:31:39 PM »

The ALP is NOT happy with the way negotiations are being conducted. To be seen TO BE OPENLY HAGGLING OVER POSITIONS will NOT go down well with the public, or, for that matter, our membership.

We have other issues will the way things are being conducted as well, but feel it would be wrong to mention them publically.

What is wrong with reaching agreement in the open, so long as we don't degenerate into pointless bickering?  So far the discussions have been conducted in a cordial manner that speaks well of us.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #5 on: February 24, 2008, 08:41:00 PM »

I will also consider the role of Prime Minister as two quotas, those of Foreign Affairs and Treasury and Finance as 1.5 quotas and each other post 1 quota. The Deputy LBL will also be given a 1 quota department making it worth 2 quotas, and cannot be from the same party as the Left Bloc Leader.
That is acceptable, but are Treasury and Finance are separate posts, or is that the name of one single post?

Would Dockers House be an acceptable meeting place?

Dockers House is acceptable as a meeting place for Left Bloc consultations.

Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2008, 10:49:24 PM »

Mind adding some green to that logo for the Greens and us SoCreds?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #7 on: March 01, 2008, 02:15:57 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Douglas Hordern
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.