official SC Democratic results thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 04:35:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  official SC Democratic results thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 21
Author Topic: official SC Democratic results thread  (Read 22564 times)
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #300 on: January 26, 2008, 07:53:27 PM »

looks like Edwards is going to win a few of the NE counties.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,431
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #301 on: January 26, 2008, 07:53:53 PM »

Vanderblubb is just jealous that I have burning skilz.

Go back to Grade 2 already.
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,643
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #302 on: January 26, 2008, 07:54:36 PM »

Just kidding. jeez.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #303 on: January 26, 2008, 07:54:57 PM »


Is this about his sig?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,992
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #304 on: January 26, 2008, 07:55:09 PM »

Just to depress myself...

% Blacks voting for the black* candidate: 80
% Whites voting for the white candidates: 76

Admittedly there's not much to choose betwixed the candidates other than that... but... still... Sad

*Well, more or less.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #305 on: January 26, 2008, 07:55:27 PM »

8% reporting:
Obama 23,209 50%
 Clinton 13,657 29%
 Edwards 9,596 21%
 Kucinich 58 0%
Logged
exopolitician
MATCHU[D]
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,892
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #306 on: January 26, 2008, 07:55:50 PM »

Edwards broke 20% yay...*small party*
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #307 on: January 26, 2008, 07:56:11 PM »

CNN's exit polls predict something along the lines of 54% Obama, 27% Clinton, 18% Edwards
Logged
Saxwsylvania
Van Der Blub
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,534


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #308 on: January 26, 2008, 07:56:23 PM »

I love how big a spin everyone has on this. The Democratic Primary has become a white vs black race. I saw the exit poll results on MSNBC, and only 16% of 60+ white voters went for Obama.
So... the old racist whites voted against the Negro. Big surprise.

Obama won among young whites, who no longer decide things by race, as the Clinton campaign would have us.

It will be interesting to see whether some younger generation Democrats in the House and elsewhere will come out for Obama soon now that he has become the candidate of young people.

He has always been the candidate of the young people/misinformed.  But unfortunately for Obama, you have to be 25 to be in Congress.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #309 on: January 26, 2008, 07:56:36 PM »

9% reporting:
Obama 24,954 50%
 Clinton 14,923 30%
 Edwards 10,276 20%
 Kucinich 62 0%
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #310 on: January 26, 2008, 07:57:28 PM »

9% reporting:

Obama 25,818 50%
 Clinton 15,223 30%
 Edwards 10,522 20%
 Kucinich 63 0%
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,992
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #311 on: January 26, 2008, 07:57:49 PM »

looks like Edwards is going to win a few of the NE counties.

Area he were born in.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #312 on: January 26, 2008, 07:58:19 PM »

Just to depress myself...

% Blacks voting for the black* candidate: 80
% Whites voting for the white candidates: 76

Admittedly there's not much to choose betwixed the candidates other than that... but... still... Sad

*Well, more or less.
Except many of the Edwards voters could simply be anti-Clinton voters who would have voted for Obama if Edwards was not an option. I would still Clinton to win the white vote in that case but it isn't like a significant portion would not go to Obama.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,718
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #313 on: January 26, 2008, 07:58:39 PM »

Hillary fans and Obamamaniacs better get out the tissues.  Hillary fans for their tears, Obamamaniacs for the huge load they are sure to shoot later tonight.
LOL
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,708
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #314 on: January 26, 2008, 07:58:43 PM »

So who wants to throw out the "Reverse Bradley Effect Charge" charge?
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,643
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #315 on: January 26, 2008, 07:59:08 PM »

looks like Edwards is going to win a few of the NE counties.

Area he were born in.
NW is where he was born.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #316 on: January 26, 2008, 07:59:20 PM »

12% reporting:
Obama 34,663 53%
 Clinton 18,437 28%
 Edwards 12,148 19%
 Kucinich 74 0%
Logged
MarkWarner08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,812


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #317 on: January 26, 2008, 07:59:30 PM »

So who wants to throw out the "Reverse Bradley Effect Charge" charge?
The Bradley Effect didn't happen in NH or SC. Period.
Logged
Saxwsylvania
Van Der Blub
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,534


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #318 on: January 26, 2008, 08:00:02 PM »

So who wants to throw out the "Reverse Bradley Effect Charge" charge?

The Clintons.  Not explicitly, of course.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,992
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #319 on: January 26, 2008, 08:00:09 PM »


I sometimes get east and west confused... so presumably counties near the state were he was once Senator?
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #320 on: January 26, 2008, 08:00:21 PM »

13% repoting:

Obama 35,342 52%
 Clinton 19,381 28%
 Edwards 13,595 20%
 Kucinich 75 0%
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,992
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #321 on: January 26, 2008, 08:01:03 PM »

Except many of the Edwards voters could simply be anti-Clinton voters who would have voted for Obama if Edwards was not an option. I would still Clinton to win the white vote in that case but it isn't like a significant portion would not go to Obama.

The significant part is that they didn't vote for Obama. They voted for a candidate who's all-but dead in the water.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #322 on: January 26, 2008, 08:01:09 PM »

14% reporting:

Obama 39,377 53%
 Clinton 20,899 28%
 Edwards 14,321 19%
 Kucinich 79 0%
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #323 on: January 26, 2008, 08:01:23 PM »


I sometimes get east and west confused... so presumably counties near the state were he was once Senator?
Sorry, I meant NW
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #324 on: January 26, 2008, 08:01:45 PM »


Which is where he leads. Oconee County, anyway, and with 74% in. (45E-30C-25O)
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 21  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 13 queries.