SC PrimD: Public Policy Polling: Obama dominates SC.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 05, 2024, 09:03:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  SC PrimD: Public Policy Polling: Obama dominates SC.
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SC PrimD: Public Policy Polling: Obama dominates SC.  (Read 1398 times)
Flying Dog
Jtfdem
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,404
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 22, 2008, 04:45:55 PM »

New Poll: South Carolina President by Public Policy Polling on 2008-01-21

Summary:
Obama:
44%
Clinton:
28%
Edwards:
15%
Other:
1%
Undecided:
12%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
Flying Dog
Jtfdem
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,404
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2008, 04:53:18 PM »

Clinton has basically given up campaigning in South Carolina. However, her husband is still in the state stumping for her. I would caution Obama not to get complacent. Remember NH.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2008, 05:38:10 PM »

Clinton has basically given up campaigning in South Carolina. However, her husband is still in the state stumping for her. I would caution Obama not to get complacent. Remember NH.

I don't think Bradley will have an big of an impact in SC as it did in NH.  I don't think it works on black people.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,546
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2008, 05:51:16 PM »

Blowout? *Crosses Fingers*
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2008, 06:04:54 PM »

OK - I'm not argree or disagreeing with this theory... I'm just laying it out there.

I heard someone on the NewsHour suggest that for Obama to win SC by this margin or bigger, might be worse for him, in the long run than if it were a close win.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,546
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2008, 06:09:39 PM »

OK - I'm not argree or disagreeing with this theory... I'm just laying it out there.

I heard someone on the NewsHour suggest that for Obama to win SC by this margin or bigger, might be worse for him, in the long run than if it were a close win.

WTF? Can't we cut this guy a break?
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2008, 06:10:54 PM »
« Edited: January 22, 2008, 06:17:49 PM by Fmr Gov. Polnut »

OK - I'm not argree or disagreeing with this theory... I'm just laying it out there.

I heard someone on the NewsHour suggest that for Obama to win SC by this margin or bigger, might be worse for him, in the long run than if it were a close win.

WTF? Can't we cut this guy a break?

No... I'm not saying it's preferable.  Settle down - I'll explain the logic behind the theory.

The SUGGESTION  was that if Obama wins SC by a big margin, given the proportion of the primary voters being AA, and he doesn't win a majority of any other group. It makes race a BIG determining factor in his success, something Obama has really been able to avoid.

I'm not saying it's right or appropriate... I'm just reporting.

If Obama wins by this margin or bigger, I'll congratulate him.
Logged
Angel of Death
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,413
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2008, 06:15:12 PM »

OK - I'm not argree or disagreeing with this theory... I'm just laying it out there.

I heard someone on the NewsHour suggest that for Obama to win SC by this margin or bigger, might be worse for him, in the long run than if it were a close win.

I was thinking the same thing. Expect a whole deck of race cards being thrown about by the Clintons while *still* being subtle about it.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,956


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2008, 06:23:04 PM »

If he beats Clinton by 16%, I'd have to think he's at least tie when it comes to the white vote.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2008, 06:29:35 PM »

If he beats Clinton by 16%, I'd have to think he's at least tie when it comes to the white vote.

no...  if we assume that the electorate will be half black, half-white, that would then ifer that Obama could only beat Clinton among blacks by 32% when in reality it will be by about 60%.
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,643
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 22, 2008, 06:33:52 PM »

If he beats Clinton by 16%, I'd have to think he's at least tie when it comes to the white vote.
Not really. Edwards is beating him with the white vote, and is doing almost as well as Clinton.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 22, 2008, 06:39:26 PM »

If he beats Clinton by 16%, I'd have to think he's at least tie when it comes to the white vote.
Not really. Edwards is beating him with the white vote, and is doing almost as well as Clinton.

Not if this poll came to be true. Edwards has led him in the white vote, but only in the Rasmussen poll that had him ahead by only 5 (which was right after NH and has since been superseded by a Rasmussen poll showing him up 13, although I admit not having seen the breakdown of it). No poll has shown Edwards doing comparably to Clinton in the white vote; it looked something like:

Blacks
Obama: 65
Clinton: 15
Edwards: 2

Whites
Clinton: 35
Edwards: 23
Obama: 20
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,546
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 22, 2008, 06:53:05 PM »

I hope Obama beats Edwards among white voters. I know he won't beat Clinton.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,546
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 22, 2008, 06:54:59 PM »

OK - I'm not argree or disagreeing with this theory... I'm just laying it out there.

I heard someone on the NewsHour suggest that for Obama to win SC by this margin or bigger, might be worse for him, in the long run than if it were a close win.

WTF? Can't we cut this guy a break?

No... I'm not saying it's preferable.  Settle down - I'll explain the logic behind the theory.

The SUGGESTION  was that if Obama wins SC by a big margin, given the proportion of the primary voters being AA, and he doesn't win a majority of any other group. It makes race a BIG determining factor in his success, something Obama has really been able to avoid.

I'm not saying it's right or appropriate... I'm just reporting.

If Obama wins by this margin or bigger, I'll congratulate him.

Just to clarify, I wasn't reacting to you Polnut. I was just reacting to these absurd theories being put forth by pundits.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 22, 2008, 07:06:30 PM »

OK - I'm not argree or disagreeing with this theory... I'm just laying it out there.

I heard someone on the NewsHour suggest that for Obama to win SC by this margin or bigger, might be worse for him, in the long run than if it were a close win.

WTF? Can't we cut this guy a break?

No... I'm not saying it's preferable.  Settle down - I'll explain the logic behind the theory.

The SUGGESTION  was that if Obama wins SC by a big margin, given the proportion of the primary voters being AA, and he doesn't win a majority of any other group. It makes race a BIG determining factor in his success, something Obama has really been able to avoid.

I'm not saying it's right or appropriate... I'm just reporting.

If Obama wins by this margin or bigger, I'll congratulate him.

Just to clarify, I wasn't reacting to you Polnut. I was just reacting to these absurd theories being put forth by pundits.

Gotcha Smiley
Logged
Flying Dog
Jtfdem
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,404
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 22, 2008, 07:35:57 PM »

Obama also leads 45-29% among women. Ouch.

He leads 43-27% among men.

Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,546
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 22, 2008, 07:37:55 PM »

Obama also leads 45-29% among women. Ouch.

He leads 43-27% among men.



No gender gap? That is an interesting development.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 22, 2008, 07:38:38 PM »

Obama also leads 45-29% among women. Ouch.

He leads 43-27% among men.



No gender gap? That is an interesting development.

One which also makes me unfortunately wary of believing this poll.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: January 22, 2008, 07:39:56 PM »

Obama also leads 45-29% among women. Ouch.

He leads 43-27% among men.



No gender gap? That is an interesting development.

One which also makes me unfortunately wary of believing this poll.

It's PPP, which has never seemed all that reliable in the past. Still, they do seem to agree with other polling of the race, more or less, though are marginally more favorable to Obama.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,546
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: January 22, 2008, 07:45:48 PM »

Obama also leads 45-29% among women. Ouch.

He leads 43-27% among men.



No gender gap? That is an interesting development.

One which also makes me unfortunately wary of believing this poll.

It's PPP, which has never seemed all that reliable in the past. Still, they do seem to agree with other polling of the race, more or less, though are marginally more favorable to Obama.

Eh... I really wouldn't be that shocked if there wasn't much of a gender gap here. Black women are going to go very strongly for Obama.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: January 22, 2008, 07:49:09 PM »

That's actually a good point.

The black electorate in South Carolina should be much more female than the white electorate.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: January 23, 2008, 04:38:34 AM »

That's actually a good point.

The black electorate in South Carolina should be much more female than the white electorate.

Exactly. Black women always turn out in much higher proportions than black men. So I'd expect that to reduce the gender gap quite a bit.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: January 23, 2008, 07:25:56 AM »

Yep in the SC Dem primary race trumps everything else.
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: January 23, 2008, 07:34:51 AM »

Obama also leads 45-29% among women. Ouch.

He leads 43-27% among men.

That is, in scientific terms, pretty friggin' awesome.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 14 queries.