2000 Election - DUI Charge Against Gore Not Bush
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 07:47:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  2000 Election - DUI Charge Against Gore Not Bush
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2000 Election - DUI Charge Against Gore Not Bush  (Read 1097 times)
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 01, 2008, 03:55:56 PM »

In 2000, in the last week of the campaign, the 1976 DUI charge against George W Bush was revealed to the public.

In this scenario, Al Gore was the one who had the 1976 DUI conviction revealed.  Bush had no DUI charge or conviction in his life.  Gore admits to the 1976 charge and the conviction, in which he paid a $150.00 fine, and his driving privileges were temporarily suspended in Tennessee where the conviction took place.

Question

How does this event, where the DUI conviction is against Gore, not Bush, affect the 2000 election?

Bush/Cheney vs Gore/Lieberman

Please discuss. 

Use a map if you wish.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 01, 2008, 03:57:25 PM »

It does not affect the race.
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 01, 2008, 04:01:49 PM »


I concur with the statement made by Xahar. Florida still goes to Bush and he is elected 43rd President of the United States.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,994
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 01, 2008, 04:11:37 PM »


I concur with the statement made by Xahar. Florida still goes to Bush and he is elected 43rd President of the United States.

in this scenario, it is possible that you wouldnt have to italicize "elected"
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 01, 2008, 04:12:30 PM »


I concur with the statement made by Xahar. Florida still goes to Bush and he is elected 43rd President of the United States.

in this scenario, it is possible that you wouldnt have to italicize "elected"

It is a possiblity Earl.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 01, 2008, 04:51:10 PM »

I believe in this scenario that Bush wins Florida uncontested, and adds on Iowa and New Mexico, which he lost by very, very, narrow margins.

He possibly adds on Wisconsin and Oregon as well.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,937


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 01, 2008, 06:17:05 PM »

Due to the closeness of the election, this change of events probably shifts Florida, Iowa and New Mexico into the Bush column.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,074


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 01, 2008, 08:36:31 PM »

and Wisconsin. He lost that by like 0.4%.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 12 queries.