Estate Tax Reform Bill (Withdrawn)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 10:15:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Estate Tax Reform Bill (Withdrawn)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Estate Tax Reform Bill (Withdrawn)  (Read 3431 times)
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 29, 2007, 08:57:28 AM »
« edited: August 03, 2007, 09:36:59 AM by Sam Spade »

Estate Tax Reform Bill

Effective FY 2008, Clause 3 of the Tax Increase Act is amended as follows:
Each portion of the value of the estate shall be taxed at the following rates, with each rate corresponding to the tax rate on only the portion of the estate that falls in the appointed range:

a) $0-$2,000,000 – 0%
b) $2,000,001-$4,000,000 – 3%
c) $4,000,001-$9,000,000 – 4%
d) $9,000,001-$15,500,000 – 5%
e) $15,500,001-$22,000,000 – 7.5%
f) $22,000,001-$45,000,000 – 10%
g) $45,000,001-$75,000,000 – 12.5%
h) $75,000,001-$100,000,000 – 15%
i) $100,000,001 and above – 17.5%
j) Farmers' non-residential property shall be taxed at 50% the normal tax rate.

(Sponsor: Ebowed)
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2007, 09:04:36 AM »
« Edited: July 30, 2007, 09:19:34 AM by 24 DuPont Chevrolet »

Well since this hit the floor Ebowed was opening himself up to this amendment:

I propose to replace Sections A-J with an amendment to create a flat percentage of 5%
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2007, 01:14:31 PM »

Well since this hit the floor Ebowed was opening himself up to this amendment:

I propose to replace Sections A-J with an amendment to create a flat percentage of 8%

That is not a specific enough amendment - You need to go back to the original bill and tell me at what "price range" the 8% starts at.
Logged
Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2007, 01:49:27 PM »

Here is the current section 3:

    * 3. An estate tax is established. Each portion of the value of the estate shall be taxed at the following rates, with each rate corresponding to the tax rate on only the portion of the estate that falls in the appointed range:

a) $0-$5,000,000 – 0%
b) $5,000,001-$10,000,000 – 3%
c) $10,000,001-$17,500,000 – 4%
d) $17,500,001-$25,000,000 – 5%
e) $25,000,001-$50,000,000 – 7.5%
f) $50,000,001-$100,000,000 – 10%
g) $100,000,001 and above – 12.5%
h) Farmers' non-residential property shall be taxed at 50% the normal tax rate
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 29, 2007, 02:14:07 PM »

Well since this hit the floor Ebowed was opening himself up to this amendment:

I propose to replace Sections A-J with an amendment to create a flat percentage of 8%

That is not a specific enough amendment - You need to go back to the original bill and tell me at what "price range" the 8% starts at.

$0+, it's a flat tax
Logged
The Man From G.O.P.
TJN2024
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2007, 08:40:26 AM »

Well since this hit the floor Ebowed was opening himself up to this amendment:

I propose to replace Sections A-J with an amendment to create a flat percentage of 8%


You want to put an estate tax of 8% on everyone?
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2007, 08:57:08 AM »

Well since this hit the floor Ebowed was opening himself up to this amendment:

I propose to replace Sections A-J with an amendment to create a flat percentage of 8%


You want to put an estate tax of 8% on everyone?
Certainly better than unfair percentages on different groups.  I think totally eliminating it would not be a great idea.  Possibly dropping the percentage though might be better.
Logged
The Man From G.O.P.
TJN2024
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 30, 2007, 09:04:09 AM »

Well since this hit the floor Ebowed was opening himself up to this amendment:

I propose to replace Sections A-J with an amendment to create a flat percentage of 8%


You want to put an estate tax of 8% on everyone?
Certainly better than unfair percentages on different groups.  I think totally eliminating it would not be a great idea.  Possibly dropping the percentage though might be better.

If there are better ideas why don't you propose them instead of suggesting to the Senate another 8% off the top is ok to you.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2007, 09:19:20 AM »

Well since this hit the floor Ebowed was opening himself up to this amendment:

I propose to replace Sections A-J with an amendment to create a flat percentage of 8%


You want to put an estate tax of 8% on everyone?
Certainly better than unfair percentages on different groups.  I think totally eliminating it would not be a great idea.  Possibly dropping the percentage though might be better.

If there are better ideas why don't you propose them instead of suggesting to the Senate another 8% off the top is ok to you.

8% seemed reasonable to myself, anything less would have a hard time getting through the senate.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 30, 2007, 02:12:00 PM »
« Edited: July 30, 2007, 02:14:02 PM by Sam Spade »

I wish to amend the entirety of the bill to read as follows:

Effective FY 2008, Clause 3 of the Tax Increase Act is amended as follows:
Each portion of the value of the estate shall be taxed at the following rates, with each rate corresponding to the tax rate on only the portion of the estate that falls in the appointed range:

a) $0-$5,000,000 – 0%
b) $5,000,001-$10,000,000 – 1%
c) $10,000,001-$17,500,000 – 3%
d) $17,500,001-$25,000,000 – 6%
e) $25,000,001-$50,000,000 – 10%
f) $50,000,001-$100,000,000 – 15%
g) $100,000,001 and above – 25%
h) Farmers' non-residential property shall be taxed at 50% the normal tax rate above $10,000,000.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 30, 2007, 02:44:18 PM »

I withdraw my amendment for now, but I ask what the effect would be of eliminating estate taxes.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 31, 2007, 02:11:14 AM »

Senator Sam Spade's proposal seems the most reasonable.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 31, 2007, 02:57:17 AM »

I withdraw my amendment for now, but I ask what the effect would be of eliminating estate taxes.

Large loss of revenue.  Tax break for Paris Hilton.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 31, 2007, 09:49:11 AM »

I withdraw my amendment for now, but I ask what the effect would be of eliminating estate taxes.

I want to say that the amount taken in each year by estate taxes is 20-30 billion, but I don't have any stats for that.
Logged
The Man From G.O.P.
TJN2024
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 31, 2007, 11:12:23 AM »

I believe the proposal Sam currently has sounds very good.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 01, 2007, 02:00:02 PM »

We are voting on the following amendment:

I wish to amend the entirety of the bill to read as follows:

Effective FY 2008, Clause 3 of the Tax Increase Act is amended as follows:
Each portion of the value of the estate shall be taxed at the following rates, with each rate corresponding to the tax rate on only the portion of the estate that falls in the appointed range:

a) $0-$5,000,000 – 0%
b) $5,000,001-$10,000,000 – 1%
c) $10,000,001-$17,500,000 – 3%
d) $17,500,001-$25,000,000 – 6%
e) $25,000,001-$50,000,000 – 10%
f) $50,000,001-$100,000,000 – 15%
g) $100,000,001 and above – 25%
h) Farmers' non-residential property shall be taxed at 50% the normal tax rate above $10,000,000.

Please vote Aye, Nay or Abstain.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 01, 2007, 03:57:29 PM »

Nay
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 01, 2007, 04:31:42 PM »

Aye
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 01, 2007, 05:05:51 PM »

Aye
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,724
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 01, 2007, 06:06:42 PM »

Nay
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 01, 2007, 07:38:51 PM »

Aye
Logged
Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: August 01, 2007, 11:54:05 PM »

Aye
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,994
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: August 02, 2007, 04:28:19 AM »

Nay
Logged
Јas
Jas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,705
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: August 02, 2007, 08:20:47 AM »

Current Tally on Sam's Amendment
Aye: 4 (DWTL; Phil; PBrunsel; Brandon)
Nay: 3 (Ebowed; Al; Earl)
Absent: 1 (Lewis)
Yet to Vote: 2 (Rob; Sam)
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: August 02, 2007, 08:38:23 PM »

Nay.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.05 seconds with 11 queries.