Opinion of John Nance Garner
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 03:54:48 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of John Nance Garner		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Opinion of former VP John Nance Garner?
#1
FF		  
#2
HP		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 25

Author Topic: Opinion of John Nance Garner  (Read 171 times)
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,128
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 22, 2024, 08:49:45 AM »
Far from the worst, but still HP.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,668
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2024, 09:03:04 AM »
HP.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,524
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2024, 02:27:57 PM »
Definite HP.

He opposed most of the New Deal and was pretty illoyal towards Roosevelt behind the scenes. Garner was a classical ticket balancer who otherwise didn't fit into the administration he served in.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,566
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2024, 04:53:47 PM »
He wasn't worth a bucket of warm piss.
Logged
YE
Modadmin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,975


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2024, 09:14:03 AM »
HP for his complete lack of loyalties to FDR and the New Deal.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.