PA-SEN: NYT/Siena Casey +5
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 09:56:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections
  2024 Senate & House Election Polls (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  PA-SEN: NYT/Siena Casey +5
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: PA-SEN: NYT/Siena Casey +5  (Read 904 times)
Podgy the Bear
mollybecky
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,995


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 13, 2024, 06:10:05 AM »

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/13/us/politics/democrats-senate-battleground-poll.html
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,038


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2024, 08:38:17 AM »

Casey fav: 51/33 (+18)
McCormick fav: 45/25 (+20)

Fetterman fav: 49/41 (+8)
Shapiro approval: 59/24 (+35)

In LV, Casey down to +2, 46-44. I would imagine though that's due to the Hispanic sample, which is very low, and has McCormick winning by by 27% (50-23) lol
Logged
Unbeatable Titan Susan Collins
johnzaharoff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,024


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2024, 09:05:00 AM »

McCormick seems to be running a better campaign than Hovde. Stays at Lean D, but might be closer to Tilt than likely. This seems to be getting closer than WI.

Logged
SnowLabrador
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,117
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2024, 09:17:47 AM »

Biden will drag Casey under the line.
Logged
This user has not been convicted of 34 felonies
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,528
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 13, 2024, 09:18:43 AM »

Casey fav: 51/33 (+18)
McCormick fav: 45/25 (+20)

Fetterman fav: 49/41 (+8)
Shapiro approval: 59/24 (+35)

In LV, Casey down to +2, 46-44. I would imagine though that's due to the Hispanic sample, which is very low, and has McCormick winning by by 27% (50-23) lol

If Dave McCormick has a better favorability than Bob Casey, then I'm the pope.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,038


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 13, 2024, 09:20:22 AM »

Casey fav: 51/33 (+18)
McCormick fav: 45/25 (+20)

Fetterman fav: 49/41 (+8)
Shapiro approval: 59/24 (+35)

In LV, Casey down to +2, 46-44. I would imagine though that's due to the Hispanic sample, which is very low, and has McCormick winning by by 27% (50-23) lol

If Dave McCormick has a better favorability than Bob Casey, then I'm the pope.

Yeah... those #s feel very Emerson-ish. 70% of PA does not have an opinion on McCormick lol
Logged
The Economy is Getting Worse
riverwalk3
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.93, S: -3.83

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 13, 2024, 09:26:08 PM »

McCormick is a stronger candidate than I thought. Casey will likely still win with 51% favorables, but maybe McCormick could have won vs Fetterman.
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,055
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2024, 03:37:21 AM »

McCormick is a stronger candidate than I thought. Casey will likely still win with 51% favorables, but maybe McCormick could have won vs Fetterman.

If he couldn’t beat Oz in the primary, I doubt it.
Logged
MillennialModerate
MillennialMAModerate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,083
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2024, 05:44:30 AM »

Biden will drag Casey under the line.

I thought I was pessimistic lol (although to be fair even a realist is considered “oMg a DoOmEr” on this board)

Anyway - to me it’s a turnout thing. If a lot of independents turn out and Dems don’t stay home - I think you can see a lot of ticket splitting. If Trumps win is via Dems staying home instead of independents crossing over to him - then Casey will get pulled under. Otherwise he should survive
Logged
MRS DONNA SHALALA
cuddlebuns
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 627
South Africa


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 14, 2024, 07:17:21 AM »

Biden will drag Casey under the line.

I thought I was pessimistic lol (although to be fair even a realist is considered “oMg a DoOmEr” on this board)

Anyway - to me it’s a turnout thing. If a lot of independents turn out and Dems don’t stay home - I think you can see a lot of ticket splitting. If Trumps win is via Dems staying home instead of independents crossing over to him - then Casey will get pulled under. Otherwise he should survive

My man, you thought that Bolduc was going to win New Hampshire.

There is 0% chance that Casey loses this race.
Logged
RussFeingoldWasRobbed
Progress96
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,298
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 28, 2024, 05:20:39 AM »

McCormick is running a good campaign but that can only get you so far when you are as out of touch with the common man as he is.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,682
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 29, 2024, 06:17:59 AM »

Safe D -> Safe D
Logged
Ancestral Republican
Crane
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,939
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -8.16, S: 3.22

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 29, 2024, 07:13:04 AM »

Biden will drag Casey under the line.

Seek help.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,682
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 03, 2024, 03:28:00 PM »

McCormick is running a good campaign but that can only get you so far when you are as out of touch with the common man as he is.

No, he isn’t; his campaign has been a mess
Logged
ctherainbow
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 430
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 06, 2024, 12:26:27 PM »

I continue to be shocked by the number of people who think Bob Casey is actually vulnerable.  Worry about the Michigan Senate seat; Casey will be fine.  He’s recently come out with excellent TV ads focusing on his votes to expand semiconductor production in the US and take jobs back from China, has been barnstorming the rural counties to stanch the bleeding there, and he’s a Scranton candidate who has three other statewide PA candidates (from Pittsburgh, the Capitol area, and Philadelphia, pretty much a perfect geographic spread for the Dem coalition here) stumping for him as well.

He may not win by a huge margin, but he’ll win.
Logged
Spectator
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,454
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 06, 2024, 12:54:04 PM »

I continue to be shocked by the number of people who think Bob Casey is actually vulnerable.  Worry about the Michigan Senate seat; Casey will be fine.  He’s recently come out with excellent TV ads focusing on his votes to expand semiconductor production in the US and take jobs back from China, has been barnstorming the rural counties to stanch the bleeding there, and he’s a Scranton candidate who has three other statewide PA candidates (from Pittsburgh, the Capitol area, and Philadelphia, pretty much a perfect geographic spread for the Dem coalition here) stumping for him as well.

He may not win by a huge margin, but he’ll win.

Yeah, I agree that Michigan is the most vulnerable seat after the WV/MT/OH trio. I could’ve been convinced it was Nevada, but for whatever odd reason, Rosen seems to be polling extremely well compared to Biden there. That one is the most puzzling to me.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,329
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: June 06, 2024, 01:10:28 PM »

I continue to be shocked by the number of people who think Bob Casey is actually vulnerable.  Worry about the Michigan Senate seat; Casey will be fine.  He’s recently come out with excellent TV ads focusing on his votes to expand semiconductor production in the US and take jobs back from China, has been barnstorming the rural counties to stanch the bleeding there, and he’s a Scranton candidate who has three other statewide PA candidates (from Pittsburgh, the Capitol area, and Philadelphia, pretty much a perfect geographic spread for the Dem coalition here) stumping for him as well.

He may not win by a huge margin, but he’ll win.

Yeah, I agree that Michigan is the most vulnerable seat after the WV/MT/OH trio. I could’ve been convinced it was Nevada, but for whatever odd reason, Rosen seems to be polling extremely well compared to Biden there. That one is the most puzzling to me.

I think Trump needs to win Michigan by quite a few points to pull Rogers ahead though and I don’t see that.
Logged
Spectator
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,454
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: June 06, 2024, 01:25:34 PM »

I continue to be shocked by the number of people who think Bob Casey is actually vulnerable.  Worry about the Michigan Senate seat; Casey will be fine.  He’s recently come out with excellent TV ads focusing on his votes to expand semiconductor production in the US and take jobs back from China, has been barnstorming the rural counties to stanch the bleeding there, and he’s a Scranton candidate who has three other statewide PA candidates (from Pittsburgh, the Capitol area, and Philadelphia, pretty much a perfect geographic spread for the Dem coalition here) stumping for him as well.

He may not win by a huge margin, but he’ll win.

Yeah, I agree that Michigan is the most vulnerable seat after the WV/MT/OH trio. I could’ve been convinced it was Nevada, but for whatever odd reason, Rosen seems to be polling extremely well compared to Biden there. That one is the most puzzling to me.

I think Trump needs to win Michigan by quite a few points to pull Rogers ahead though and I don’t see that.

Idk. Michigan is the state where the Dem Senate nominee seems to be running the least amount ahead of Biden in polling. The others are all generally pretty substantial.
Logged
DaleCooper
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,405


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: June 06, 2024, 01:29:42 PM »

I continue to be shocked by the number of people who think Bob Casey is actually vulnerable.  Worry about the Michigan Senate seat; Casey will be fine.  He’s recently come out with excellent TV ads focusing on his votes to expand semiconductor production in the US and take jobs back from China, has been barnstorming the rural counties to stanch the bleeding there, and he’s a Scranton candidate who has three other statewide PA candidates (from Pittsburgh, the Capitol area, and Philadelphia, pretty much a perfect geographic spread for the Dem coalition here) stumping for him as well.

He may not win by a huge margin, but he’ll win.

Yeah, I agree that Michigan is the most vulnerable seat after the WV/MT/OH trio. I could’ve been convinced it was Nevada, but for whatever odd reason, Rosen seems to be polling extremely well compared to Biden there. That one is the most puzzling to me.

I think Trump needs to win Michigan by quite a few points to pull Rogers ahead though and I don’t see that.

Idk. Michigan is the state where the Dem Senate nominee seems to be running the least amount ahead of Biden in polling. The others are all generally pretty substantial.

It must be because it's an open seat. I think it's true that outside of a horrible candidate like Rick Santorum, or hopelessly polarized states like Alabama, incumbency is still a huge advantage. Brown and Tester will test this, but if they win or barely lose then clearly incumbency still means the world in these kind of elections.
Logged
Spectator
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,454
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: Today at 09:28:40 AM »

I continue to be shocked by the number of people who think Bob Casey is actually vulnerable.  Worry about the Michigan Senate seat; Casey will be fine.  He’s recently come out with excellent TV ads focusing on his votes to expand semiconductor production in the US and take jobs back from China, has been barnstorming the rural counties to stanch the bleeding there, and he’s a Scranton candidate who has three other statewide PA candidates (from Pittsburgh, the Capitol area, and Philadelphia, pretty much a perfect geographic spread for the Dem coalition here) stumping for him as well.

He may not win by a huge margin, but he’ll win.

Yeah, I agree that Michigan is the most vulnerable seat after the WV/MT/OH trio. I could’ve been convinced it was Nevada, but for whatever odd reason, Rosen seems to be polling extremely well compared to Biden there. That one is the most puzzling to me.

I think Trump needs to win Michigan by quite a few points to pull Rogers ahead though and I don’t see that.

Idk. Michigan is the state where the Dem Senate nominee seems to be running the least amount ahead of Biden in polling. The others are all generally pretty substantial.

It must be because it's an open seat. I think it's true that outside of a horrible candidate like Rick Santorum, or hopelessly polarized states like Alabama, incumbency is still a huge advantage. Brown and Tester will test this, but if they win or barely lose then clearly incumbency still means the world in these kind of elections.

Funny enough, Doug Jones' doomed 2020 campaign is still a good example of the power of incumbency. Even in extremely polarized Alabama, he still outran Biden by 5%. That would be enough for basically all incumbent Democrats aside from Tester and Brown to hold on. And Tester and Brown have shown hints that they might be able to overperform Biden by the double digits needed. It just remains to be seen if that will hold up.

As for the open seats, I think you're correct that that is why Slotkin is only narrowly outperforming Biden. I think most polls only have her doing about 2-3 points better than Biden, which still would probably be enough to survive, but obviously well within the margin of error, and Rogers could be the beneficiary of a polling miss. As for the other open-seat race in Arizona, I think Gallego dramatically outperforming Biden by the 10+ points that most polls seem to show kind of makes sense... He is a hispanic Marine, which is basically the dream profile that most Democratic strategists would create in a simulated incubator. And he's running against Kari Lake who somehow makes Trump look more moderate and reasonable by comparison. I think that divergence makes a lot of sense.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,048
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: Today at 09:32:38 AM »

The margin sounds reasonable.

Question is by how much does Casey have to win to make sure Biden gets over the top as well? 5 pts. seems to be enough imho. I don't believe there will be that much ticket splitting outside states like MT and OH. Many voters polled who support downballot Dems are left-leaning and will almost certainly come home in November. Even with some reservatations over Biden. A vote is a vote, and they count equally. No matter how fired up MAGA is.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,038


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: Today at 09:33:58 AM »

Honestly, Casey being only +2 compared to most other polls we've gotten makes me continue to think that the Siena state polling is underrating Dems chances quite a lot (right now)
Logged
Spectator
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,454
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: Today at 09:37:55 AM »

The margin sounds reasonable.

Question is by how much does Casey have to win to make sure Biden gets over the top as well? 5 pts. seems to be enough imho. I don't believe there will be that much ticket splitting outside states like MT and OH. Many voters polled who support downballot Dems are left-leaning and will almost certainly come home in November. Even with some reservatations over Biden. A vote is a vote, and they count equally. No matter how fired up MAGA is.

Reverse coattails isn't a thing. If that was the case, Obama would have won Missouri in 2012 given the Dem landslides in the governor and Senate races.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,048
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: Today at 09:37:57 AM »

Honestly, Casey being only +2 compared to most other polls we've gotten makes me continue to think that the Siena state polling is underrating Dems chances quite a lot (right now)

What final result do you expect here? I'd say Casey wins 51-46%. So, similar to 2022.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,048
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: Today at 09:40:06 AM »

The margin sounds reasonable.

Question is by how much does Casey have to win to make sure Biden gets over the top as well? 5 pts. seems to be enough imho. I don't believe there will be that much ticket splitting outside states like MT and OH. Many voters polled who support downballot Dems are left-leaning and will almost certainly come home in November. Even with some reservatations over Biden. A vote is a vote, and they count equally. No matter how fired up MAGA is.

Reverse coattails isn't a thing. If that was the case, Obama would have won Missouri in 2012 given the Dem landslides in the governor and Senate races.

Well, that was a different state and a totally different time in politics. In 2020, most downballot Dems even finished slightly behind Biden.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 13 queries.