Opinion of voter registrations stats?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:12:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  2024 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, GeorgiaModerate, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Opinion of voter registrations stats?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Opinion of voter registrations stats?  (Read 170 times)
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,724


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 23, 2024, 05:32:27 PM »

Some states like Florida are good about publishing voter reg states by county pretty frequently, meaning we have a live dataset to try and analyze. What's nice about this data is unlike a poll which is hypothetical and may be flawed, these are real numbers.

However, there are some things that can muddy the waters when it comes to voter reg stats.

One thing is the lag - many people who are essentially safe D/R voters federally right now are currently registered with the opposite party, and many of these voters are only changing their registrations now. Good example is FL where many of the panhandle counties that have been safe R federally for quite a while have only recently flipped to being R plurality/majority.

Another variable is registered Independents/NPAs. This block isn't necessarily a 50-50 block like many assume - there is a lot of evidence that in many states like NV and NC, the increasing Independent/NPA registration is largely powered by D-leaning voters. This might also mean Ds relatively poor numbers in new regiristrations relative to Rs in Nevada might not actually be so bad.

What do ya'll think?
Logged
Minnesota Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,079


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2024, 05:49:39 PM »

In some states it provides interesting info but overall it's usually flawed data and it's getting worse. Overall the number of people registering some version of "no party preference" is exploding while those registering with the major parties is declining. This is especially true in many blue states that have adopted automatic voter registration in recent years. Then of course there are states such as Minnesota with no party registration.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,689
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2024, 05:50:49 PM »

We should know from early voting how much Ds are winning a Landslide or a 303 map but I still have hopes for FL, that's why Trump isn't up 8 in MI the Early votes from DTW is going for heavily Biden not Trump

We will vote now and it's gonna be an exact duplicate map for Prez 303 Trump isn't winning MI, PA and WI
Logged
An American Tail: Fubart Goes West
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,732
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2024, 07:37:20 PM »

I think that you could probably use something like Florida’s dataset with the right modeling (e.g. try to estimate the number of Dixiecrats).

New voter registration stats might help a bit to see if perhaps there’s a trend towards on candidate or the other, but I wouldn’t rely solely on it.
Logged
2016
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,518


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2024, 08:00:11 PM »

Some states like Florida are good about publishing voter reg states by county pretty frequently, meaning we have a live dataset to try and analyze. What's nice about this data is unlike a poll which is hypothetical and may be flawed, these are real numbers.

However, there are some things that can muddy the waters when it comes to voter reg stats.

One thing is the lag - many people who are essentially safe D/R voters federally right now are currently registered with the opposite party, and many of these voters are only changing their registrations now. Good example is FL where many of the panhandle counties that have been safe R federally for quite a while have only recently flipped to being R plurality/majority.

Another variable is registered Independents/NPAs. This block isn't necessarily a 50-50 block like many assume - there is a lot of evidence that in many states like NV and NC, the increasing Independent/NPA registration is largely powered by D-leaning voters. This might also mean Ds relatively poor numbers in new regiristrations relative to Rs in Nevada might not actually be so bad.

What do ya'll think?
Voter Registration Data is nice.

However what's more important is the Early-In-Person + VBM Data that's going to be available close to an Election and Florida does best in there.
I knew Trump would win Florida in 2020 because of the combined Early-In-Person/VBM Florida published. At the end of Early Voting Democrats had a 100,000 lead over Republicans. I knew this wasn't going to hold through Election Day. Also the Miami-Dade County Data where D's only had a 60,000 Ballot Edge heading into E-Day was enough for me to extrapolate that Trump would be doing much better in 2020 compared to 2016.

I wish every State would run 10-Minute Intervalls on the Early and E-Day Vote like FL does.

These kind of Data Sets does allow you extrapolate and you can have an 80-85 % Degree of Confidence who wins the State.

Finally you can already be sure of that Biden won't do as well with NPA/Independent Voters in FL and Nationally in 2024. He won them by Double Digits in 2020.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 11 queries.